Augustine believes that you should follow the rules he provides, in order to interpret the Scriptures correctly. This is because he claims divine inspiration by receiving suggestions in thought from God himself (3). Since St. Augustine believes he is divinely inspired, this gives some explanation as to why he believes there is a difference between discovering and teaching. He mentions these two terms because he sees them as a form of treatment to the Scriptures (7). He spends the first three books explaining what discovery is. Discovery is a way in which we understand the things in the Scripture. He states early on what he will use to help us understand better what discovery really is, but then goes on for the next two books giving examples, to further our understanding. The main example he uses is about “signs” and “things”. He describes signs as a symbol, which represents something bigger. Then tells us that with every sign, that a thing is paired with it, which is also the “something bigger” part. I think he is trying to explain how a parable works. I say this because a parable is a story in human terms, which would be the sign. Then each sign, symbolizes a heavenly “thing”, which we otherwise could not understand, without it being told in human terms
Augustine believes that you should follow the rules he provides, in order to interpret the Scriptures correctly. This is because he claims divine inspiration by receiving suggestions in thought from God himself (3). Since St. Augustine believes he is divinely inspired, this gives some explanation as to why he believes there is a difference between discovering and teaching. He mentions these two terms because he sees them as a form of treatment to the Scriptures (7). He spends the first three books explaining what discovery is. Discovery is a way in which we understand the things in the Scripture. He states early on what he will use to help us understand better what discovery really is, but then goes on for the next two books giving examples, to further our understanding. The main example he uses is about “signs” and “things”. He describes signs as a symbol, which represents something bigger. Then tells us that with every sign, that a thing is paired with it, which is also the “something bigger” part. I think he is trying to explain how a parable works. I say this because a parable is a story in human terms, which would be the sign. Then each sign, symbolizes a heavenly “thing”, which we otherwise could not understand, without it being told in human terms