However, Mr. is only used in one connotation. Like Frye expresses, unless looked at from the “big picture” prospective, it is neglected. This is just one example of our language that reflects the subordination of women. Marilyn Frye relates oppression to a birdcage. You cannot see oppression just by looking at one bar in the cage; you have to look at the whole picture. Only by taking a couple steps back can you see that oppression is in our homes and in our everyday lives. My conception of racism is informed by the work of Marilyn Frye in her piece entitled “Oppression”[2]. Frye describes oppression as a systematic social structure the purpose of which is the subjugation of various groups of people in relation to a dominant group. She says: “The experience of oppressed people is that the living of one’s life is confined and shaped by forces and barriers which are not accidental or occasional and hence avoidable, but are systematically related to each other in such a way as to catch one between and among them and restrict or penalize motion in any direction” (pg 4). Frye uses the very instructive analogy of a birdcage to describe
However, Mr. is only used in one connotation. Like Frye expresses, unless looked at from the “big picture” prospective, it is neglected. This is just one example of our language that reflects the subordination of women. Marilyn Frye relates oppression to a birdcage. You cannot see oppression just by looking at one bar in the cage; you have to look at the whole picture. Only by taking a couple steps back can you see that oppression is in our homes and in our everyday lives. My conception of racism is informed by the work of Marilyn Frye in her piece entitled “Oppression”[2]. Frye describes oppression as a systematic social structure the purpose of which is the subjugation of various groups of people in relation to a dominant group. She says: “The experience of oppressed people is that the living of one’s life is confined and shaped by forces and barriers which are not accidental or occasional and hence avoidable, but are systematically related to each other in such a way as to catch one between and among them and restrict or penalize motion in any direction” (pg 4). Frye uses the very instructive analogy of a birdcage to describe