Preview

Paleo Diet Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Paleo Diet Pros And Cons
How the proponents of the paleo diet have always won the debate over the critics because the critics' facts are not solid, are not scientific and are baseless:

If you're unacquainted with this popular eating plan, the paleo diet (also known as the "Caveman Diet") prescribes a pattern of eating that mirrors the way your forefathers ate back in the day.

"Although in theory, this may seem like a sensible eating plan, particularly, when removing salt and sugar, it has removed several recommended foods like milk and grain. The foods offer nutritional value, such as calcium, vitamin D, magnesium and phosphorus in milk and B vitamins, fibers and antioxidants in feed," says Joy Dubost, an authorized nutritionist and a spokesperson for the Academy
…show more content…
Critics of the paleo diet also argue that proponents of the paleo diet resist progress. The critics argue that the adoption of agriculture was the greatest milestone humanity has achieved. In their argument, critics stress that the domestication of plants and crops allowed humanity to have profusion of food and helped human civilizations from going extinct.

Proponents of the paleo diet waste no time rebuffing the previous critics' argument as baseless. In their counterargument, proponents of the paleo diet contend that practitioners of the paleo diet do not resist progress. On the contrary, practitioners of the paleo diet go often to the supermarket and buy black berries, cultivated avocados, domesticated apples, kale and herbs. Most paleo diet practitioners don't own orchards nor do they own parcels of land to cultivate their own fruits. They can't find avocados to consume in the wilderness. In their disagreement of the critics' accusation about resisting progress, proponents of the paleo diet contend that it is totally baseless to label a group of people who go to the same supermarket with the rest of society as progress fighters just because they don't buy any grains, processed oils, and processed juices from the
…show more content…
Not only humans were not genetically adapted to consume such processed food 100,000 year ago, but humans 200 years ago were also not adapted to consume such processed food. There was not enough time for genetic adaptation. And this mismatch between our stone-age genes and our newly adopted lifestyle is the root cause of all modern diseases including obesity. Therefore, the adoption of a paleo diet meal plan is the only way to fix this mismatch. Thus for the proponents of the paleo diet the question "is the paleo diet healthy?" is irrelevant... For proponents and practitioners, paleo diet is the only means to fix the mismatch between our stone-age genes and our newly adopted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss an article published in Time.com (2007, March) by Lindsey Tanner, explaining a recent research study which found that the Atkins diet beat three other diets for weight loss over a one year period. The actual research study appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) on March 21, 2007. Though the findings revealed greater weight loss for the Atkins participants, this paper will discuss the reasons why the study may be flawed, and its results not appropriate for making inferences regarding the public at large.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Agriculture isn’t a progress in history as it has created more problems for humanity compared to what it has served.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jared Diamond writes about the consequences of agriculture on the human race. He suggests that the earliest farming societies did not have an easier more productive lifestyle than hunter-gatherer societies, contrary to popular belief. For example, the Kalahari Bushmen spend a mere average of 12 to 19 hours a week to getting food, and on average sleep a lot, work less hard, and have more free time than people in hunter-gatherer societies. Another consequence agriculture had on humans is their diets. Hunter-gatherers eat many various wild plants and animals; therefore, they have better nutrition than farmers who generally only eat the limited variety of crops they produce. For example, the Kalahari Bushmen’s daily intake was 2,140 calories and 93 grams of protein, whereas farmers gave up good nutritional crops for cheap calories found in their starchy crops.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eng 121 Week 1 Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The introduction to processed foods took the world by storm, with quicker food preparation, less time spent cleaning, drive-thru access and the introduction to new recipes. Long before processed foods such as the Twinkie, Honey bun, Spam, frozen dinners, milk, etc; people consumed more wholesome foods naturally loaded with nutrients the human body needed to sustain itself. Processed foods did not exist until the early 19th Century and have since become highly advertised and subsidized by the government. Whole foods on the other hand receive little advertisement and no government subsidies, leading people away from choosing a healthier lifestyle. I believe that processed foods may perhaps taste, look and smell better than their natural whole food counterpart does, yet can you really afford to risk your health for the sake of being happy you had the ability to choose your meal?…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author of this essay proved many useful points in regards to the Western Diet. In order for people to change their nutrition many things have to change as well, but is it too late? Almost every food we buy and put in our mouths is full extra additives and hormones. How whole is our food really? Comparing Americans diet to other countries proves that a healthy lifestyle with better nutrition is possible. Are the people that benefit from the consequences like doctors who treat patients with heart disease, high blood pressure or diabetes or pharmaceutical companies willing to give up everything that bring in revenue? I think we know what the…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Pollan believes that people should have knowledge of foods from the ancient past. This valuable wisdom has been collected over thousands of years and can be used to improve present day diets. He states, “Modern Americans have lost the solution to the omnivore’s dilemma and today the problem is bigger than it has ever been. But it’s not an unsolvable problem. We need to recover the skills and knowledge people used to have” (104). Michael Pollan explains how learning about the history of food will result in food choices (such as eating locally-grown foods) which are safe and healthy.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critique Paper

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Kristen Weinacker’s essay “Safer? Tastier? More nutritious? The Dubious Merits of Organic Foods”, she makes a claim of fact that organic foods may not be more nutritional than conventionally grown foods. Weinacker does an exceptional job supporting her claim effectively with evidence by using the opinions of several experts, as well as the appeal to our physiological needs. She warrants that by mentioning the use of slick marketing techniques by organic food companies and our belief that organic farmers “bring us back to nature”, we tend to forgive statistical data and start to lean on our common sense. Throughout the essay Weinacker reiterates that most, if not all, of the research data available does not contain the statistical proof necessary to successfully warrant the claim.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To the average consumer, eating has now developed into well beyond an agricultural act, declares Wendell Berry. Apparent in the audience of his lectures on the decline of farming, American citizens are unable to recognize the existence of food beyond the food industry—the world of fake, processed food. Ask any individual from where their food comes and they will answer, “the grocery store.” Stirring Berry to anger, he exclaims that food begins with life, plant and animal; if food begins in the laboratory, the results more accurately categorize as experiments rather than food. Michael Pollan strongly supports this claim by stating, “what reductive science can manage to perceive well enough to isolate and study is subject to change, and that we have a tendency to assume that what we can see is all there is to see” (p. 11). What this means is that food plastered with health claims can only assure the consumer their soon-to-be purchase has been on…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What we eat and how we eat are imPortant both nutritionally and culturally. This selection suggests that how we get what we eat-through gathering and hunting versus agriculture, for example-has draThis seemspretty obvious.We all matic consequences. imagine what a struggle it must have been before the We developmentof agricu-lture. think of our ancestors spending their days searching for roots and berries to eat,or out at the crack of dawn, hunting wi.ld animals. isn't In fact, this was not quite the case.Nevertheless, it really better simply to go to the refrigerator, open the door, and reach for a container of milk to pour into a bowl of flaked grain for your regular morning meal? What could be simpler and more nutritious? There are many things that we seldom question; the truth seer$ so evident and the answers obvious. One such sacred cow is the tremendous prosPerity brought about by the agricultural revolution. This selectionis a thought-provoking introduction to the .onnection between culture and agriculture.The tran',ition from food foraging to farming (what archaeoloqists call the Neolithic revolution) may have been the rforst mistake h human history or its most imPortant event. You be the judge. But for better or worse, this tultural evolution has occurred, and the world will neverbe the samea8ain. As you rcad this selection, askyoutself the follouing questions: What is the fundamental differencebetween the progressivistview and the revisionist interpretation? How did the developmentof agriculture affect people'shealth? What three reasonsexplain the changesbrought about by the developmentof agriculture? How did the development of agriculture affect socialequaliry including genderequality? Thefollotoing terms iliscussedin this selectionate includeil in the Glossary at the back of the book: agr icult uraI dmelopment ciztilization of dofiestication plantsandqnimals hunter-gatherers Neolithic…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Paleo diet is considered a hunter-gatherer diet. The main idea is to live like a human in the Paleolithic era and help our bodies as well. It is believed that the change from a diet rich in wild fruits and vegetables to one heavy in cereal grains has increased problems like obesity, diabetes and heart disease ( ). Second, Paleolithic humans were healthy and strong. Although there was infectious disease and danger, they usually had the same lifespan as humans now( ). By switching to a diet that the body is genetically comfortable with, people will be quicker to adapt to certain changes and gain energy. Lastly, overtime the Paleolithic diet changed to one including more agriculture. Once this occurred, Paleolithic humans gradually became shorter, spindlier and more prone to sickness ( ). Considering what the human body has evolved to look like now, it is not as fit and robust as it could be. Finally, to have the assets that were available in the Paleolithic era, people need to shift their diets to include what they did years…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We must all now be familiar with the Atkins Diet. Of all of the 'trend' diets that move through our popular culture, none has caused as much interest or controversy. Put forward by the late Dr. Robert Atkins in the 70's, the diet that has caused a storm is continuing to acquire both dedicated followers and severe opponents both within and without the medical community.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pollan explains that scientific theories of nutritionism focus on individual nutrients rather than foods as a whole (Pollan, 434). He further goes on to refute this claim mentioning that these scientific theories contradict with one another. Pollan explains “the scientists who blame our health problems on deficiencies of [micronutrients] are not the same scientists who see a sugar soaked diet leading to metabolic syndrome and from there to diabetes, heart disease…”(Pollan, 435). On one hand there are scientists who blame health problems on a lack of nutrients, and on the other hand there are scientists who blame those health problems on a sugar soaked diet. By stating these theories, Pollan tries to get his point across that they all have the same thing in common; these theories are mere explanations to western diseases. In Pollan’s view, “scientists can argue all they want about the mechanisms behind this phenomenon, but whichever it is, the solution would appear to remain very much the same: Stop eating a Western diet” (Pollan, 435). In other words, no matter what reason scientists have for the causes of western…

    • 743 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How important is the food that the averages person puts into their bodies every day? Eating is a way of making peace, passing the time, sharing friendships, and having a communion. The narrator of Food Inc points out that, “The way we eat has changed more in the last 50 years than in the previous 10,000” (2008). How has it changed? Americans have gone from eating hunter-gatherer style organic greens and fruits, to severely processed sugars, carbohydrates, and high protein meats. Most Americans eat something similar to a “chicken and pasta” diet nowadays. This may not be bad, but is this “new” food really better for us than what people ate 50 and 100 years ago? Organic foods are substances that are produced using ways that do not involve modern unneeded synthetic pesticides and chemical fertilizers. Organic foods are also not processed using irradiation, industrial solvents, or chemical food additives (dictionary). Convenience food, or tertiary processed food, is commercially prepared food designed for ease of buying and consuming. Products designated as “convenience or processed foods” are often prepared so they can be sold as hot, ready-to-serve plates; as room-temperature, long lasting shelf life products; or as refrigerated or frozen products that require minimal preparation (usually just microwaving). There are studies that show that the food people consume on a daily basis…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It’s been said that humans are what they eat. The relationship humans have with food is unappreciated. Food is the fuel that keeps humans going, gives them the energy needed to be creative and productive; it is the building block of society, after all, it wasn’t until the Neolithic Era, when humans figured out a way to domesticate plants and animals, that any form of organized society formed. Even during the previous hunter-gatherer foraging era, humans were very connected to the food they ate; understanding where it came and having an idea of how it came to be was crucial to knowing what was vital to survive. In this time, food sources like grains, fruits, and vegetables were naturally abundant, whole. Humans could choose between many different types of nutritious food because there were thousands of varieties of species. Unfortunately, as populations grew and more civilized societies formed, various farming techniques were created, and a vast majority of these species became extinct to make way for the harvesting of a select few (Pringle). In the industrial era, societies around the world, especially western ones, emphasized the importance of technological advancements. With this pursuit of technology, nature became something to control rather than live with; an attempt at making life simpler, better. Breaching the gap between nature and technology is optimization. It is this obsession with optimization that most accurately characterizes contemporary America. Undoubtedly, it comes with great costs. As it turns out, optimization is a business, and a profitable one. Thus, the costs and effects of optimization are often hidden from the public by industrial leaders in an effort to maintain profits. They control the businesses they run and protect themselves by dumping millions of dollars into politics. Today, it seems that the gap between nature and technology has been breached with the propagation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The aliens that now fill…

    • 4564 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Blood Type Diet

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    this modern fare is beneficial to us, some of it can be very detrimental to our…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics