Caves were a very sacred place to Paleolithic man.
This can be seen by the frequency of cave paintings on inaccessible places of the walls, fossilized foot prints of families, even alters carved out of formations in the floor. The cave was alluring to man for the basic element of shelter from: the elements, predatory animals, and most natural disasters. Paleolithic man stumbling upon a cave would be an amazing find. While they didn't have the resources or technology to build a fully enclosed rock shelter they could just find them. In the article "Sacred Places" Witcombe said "the cave has been identified as the womb of Mother Earth." This adds another attractive feature to the cave since man respected and almost certainly viewed the earth as sacred. These caves are very important to anthropologists today, where else would they be able to find intact paintings and artifacts from twenty thousand
B.C.? Cave paintings are an important artifact left by Paleolithic man. The paintings show what was respected or important. For instance there are many depictions of large animals like deer, horse, and bulls. The bull was and still is a symbol of strength, fertility, and power. Since man had these inclinations towards the bull it would only make sense that it is one of the most depicted subjects in cave paintings rather than say an animal with a much smaller physical prowess as say a squirrel. These paintings must have been of great importance; otherwise they would not be in rather inaccessible places; as good deals of them are. Some are a quarter mile deep in caves; others are twenty feet off of the floor. This demonstrates the fact that much effort and care went into them. If they were about something pedestrian or mundane they would be in a very accessible place and most likely not be around today. The most famous and best cave paintings can be found in Lascaux France. The entire cave is covered of paintings in this style. They are in remarkably pristine condition considering their date from twenty thousand B.C. Many of these paintings show a bull or a similarly large animal being shot and impaled with an arrow. Were they painting these works in hopes that they themselves would achieve the feat depicted? A modern tribe of the pygmies did this as described in the "Pygmy Hunt" by Frobenius, "I saw that what had been drawn on the ground was an antelope, some four feet long: and the arrow was stuck in its neck. .... The hunters caught up with us that afternoon with a beautiful buck. It had been shot with an arrow through the neck." After that the pygmies went back to their drawing of the antelope and erased it appalled the arrow out of the ground. If this practice is being observed within the last hundred years I think it's fair to infer that these paintings had similar purposes. Shaman are the wise men, medicine men, and witchdoctors of their tribes. The shaman for a tribe would be chosen either by succession of bloodline, being called to it, or going on a vision quest and they would speak with nature, see visions, go into trance, and hopefully survive. Being able to have visions and induce trances is very important for a shaman. During this time the shaman is in a trance his spirit can freely leave his body. There are numerous ways in which a trance be induced such as meditating, drumming, singing, dancing, and taking hallucinogenic substances, these means have become sacred to the tribes. The drum is perhaps the oldest musical instrument. Shaman almost always have drums to help induce a trance. Their drums had special paintings on them that would help them during their trance. Many had the paintings divided into three sections the bottom representing the underworld, the middle being the earth, and the top being the heavens. During the shamans trip at night he would travel to the underworld and battle evil spirits, after that he would fly to the heavens and speak with the gods before returning to the earth. The shaman can communicate with nature as well as the gods for the betterment of his tribe. While performing his shamanic duties, which also include historian and doctor, he is dressed wild and extravagantly compared to the usual attire of his tribe. One might say that they seem a little crazy compared to the rest of their tribe, but they are living in a different world with different rules; in the "Shamanism" document Halifax said "In short, he knows the road that leads to heaven and Hell." The Venus of willendorf is one of the oldest depictions of a woman known to mankind. The figurine is eleven and one quarter centimeters long and dates from twenty thousand B.C. It is carved out of limestone; features greatly exaggerated breasts, stomach, thighs, sevens bands apparently braided hair, no face, head looking downward, no feet, and small arms perched atop its breasts. It resembles a very pregnant woman. I think it is a symbol of mother earth and fertility. If it was modeled or loosely bases on a real person the sculptor would have given it a face, which seems like a small detail in comparison to the seven bands of braided hair on its head. Furthermore the question of if people physically looked like this arise. The answer is no, man lived in a hunter gather society where it would be extremely hard for one to obtain such a girth since agriculture had yet to be developed. Even more convincing in the "Venus of Willendorf" article by Witcombe said "Significantly, none of the few Paleolithic male figures in sculpture or in engraved images is shown corpulent." So why would they sculptor make a figurine like this? In Paleolithic age people weren't fat, but they would have liked to have been. For, if that was the case it would mean that food is plentiful. So if one was making a sculptor of mother earth it would only make sense at that time to make it appear to have such an appearance so to signify the fertility her and the land. If this is the case it would also help explain the extreme proliferation of the figures. The figures can be found from France to Siberia, which at the time period demonstrates an exchange of ideas and the belief in the mother goddess or mother earth. Man hasn't physically changed in about two hundred thousand years. Twenty thousand years ago man lived in complex societies and was hardly the cartoonish caveman as portrayed in today's society. These societies contained all the above attributes, and have eventually evolved into today's society. There can't be a skyscraper before a house. In most people's eyes their achievements are overshadowed by the some would say primitive lack of technology, without our technology wouldn't we be the same?