Preview

Pavlo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pavlo
Summary Gun Control San Diego
In the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Gun control proponents have argued and some federal courts have ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to individual citizens of the United States but only to members of militias, which, they assert, are now the state National Guard units. In 2002, a federal appeals court panel ruled that "the people" only "have the right to bear arms in the service of the state.” Gun rights proponents have argued and some federal courts have ruled that the Second Amendment recognizes "an individual right to keep and bear arms." In 2001, a federal appeals court panel ruled that the Second Amendment "protects the right of individuals, including those not then actually a member of any militia or engaged in active military service or training, to privately possess and bear their own firearms..” James Madison was the primary author of the Bill of Rights, is known as the "Father of the Constitution" for his central role in its formation, and was one of three authors of the Federalist Papers, a group of essays published in newspapers and books to explain and lobby for ratification of the Constitution.

Summary “The Texas Gun Owner”
In Federalist Paper 46, James Madison addressed the concern that a standing federal army might conduct a coup to take over the nation. He argued that this was implausible because, based on the country's population at the time, a federal standing army couldn't field more than 25,000-30,000 men. He then wrote: To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. Besides the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    S. V Cruikshank Case

    • 3244 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights was an elaborate document for its time. This document was the beginning of a revolutionary country, one that was formed from brave men and women who gave their lives so that we the people of the United States may live in a free nation today. The framers of the United States Constitution were all very intelligent men and knew what it would take to create and keep a strong free society. That is why the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution gives the people of the United States the right to bear arms. In this paper I am going to discuss and validate the American people’s right to maintain firearms for their own personal protection.…

    • 3244 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution describes defensive standards and protection towards the country as a whole. The 2nd Amendment states that the security of a free state must include a regulated militia and the right to bear arms for bearing arms (The Constitution of - U.S. 2). Individuals are allowed to own weapons for self defense purposes and when enlisting into a military branch, but do not necessarily have the right to construct an offensive attack on someone who has done no such harm to them. A secure nation can only be slightly guaranteed with strong soldiers and defensive weapons such as knifes, guns, bombs, etc. Although there are many rules that limit the people to what they are allowed to do and not do, security of the state(s) and people is drafted through the constitution itself. The amendments are a safeguard from the government; moreover, they are kept from gaining too much power and having the ability to strip freedoms from the people. Instead, foundation is provided for the government to keep things running…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Kasich Pros And Cons

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (source 4). The second amendment is most important because it allows the people to intervene if the government is performing tyranny. If we the people were deprived of this right that means that we would be giving up our freedom to fight against…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Steve Rusiecki (A local police officer in his area). In this process, Richard talks about the Second Amendment, which is a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed; and the reasons for the second amendment. The Founding Fathers included this in our Bill of Rights because they feared that the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the historical aspects of the government of United States, there has been one addition to the political aspect that is considered as one of the most controversial and debated; the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment was established on December 15, 1791 with nine other to the United States’ Constitution. It was proposed by James Madison soon after the Constitution was ratified in sought of more power to the state militias. (Brooks). This Amendment also served an important factor between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. It was a form of compromise between the two groups as to who should have more power. The Amendment states, “ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment was drafted as a part of the Bill of Rights in 1789, and yet issues on its interpretation are still prevalent today. The amendment is so controversial that our jurisprudence related to the subject varies on all ends of the spectrum. We treat it as though all interpretations are ambiguous, even though simple reasoning proves otherwise. The Second Amendment in our Bill of Rights guarantees that “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had to decide whether or not to allow all citizens the right to bear arms or if there should be requirements. They came to the conclusions that, “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment has been interpreted in many different ways in the past however, the Framers intention was to have the members of the militia ready at a minutes notice to go and protect the freedom and liberty of the country. However, just like today, there was controversy over what the Second Amendment was suppose to mean to the country. James Madison argued in the Federalist paper 28 that everyone should have the right to bear arms when he wrote, “ Little more can reasonably be aimed at with the respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed and equipped ; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most highly debated amendments of the United States Constitution is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has been disputed for hundreds of years on exactly of its exact true meaning. The United States Constitution wrote the Second Amendment as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Arguments

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    on assault rifles is unconstitutional. Joseph Sobran, an American journalist and writer analyzes the amendment: "The Second Amendment, whatever else it means, clearly forbids the federal government to ‘infringe’ that right” (par. 8). The federal government has taken away that right by limiting assault rifles. First, nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government granted to right to limit an individual’s right to own firearms. On the contrary, the Second Amendment expressly grants this right to all citizens, making all gun control laws unconstitutional. James Madison said in No. 45 of The Federalist Papers, "The powers of the federal government were to be ‘few and defined.’ The supposed federal power to regulate guns is anything but ‘defined’;…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns Should Not Be Banned

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Embodied in the Second Amendment to the Constitution is the truth that self-governing individuals should bear the responsibility for defending themselves. The Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Many heated controversies in regard to the Second Amendment have been generated among legal scholars. The most vigorous debate among all is the correct meaning of the phrase. Some argue that the right of bearing arms only applies collectively to those in the militia. However, Pratt indicates that many scholars ignore the foundational principles in the Amendment, including the law of self-government and the right of self-defense. His argument is supported by a quote from one founding father, "a primary law of nature, which . . . (is] the immediate gift of the Creator." Pratt indicates that, self-defense is a God-given right that is unalienable and incapable of being surrendered or transferred.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Laws In America

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As such, our brilliant insightful forefathers - being distrustful of government - realistically understood the perpetual danger on how easily a government (politicians) can turn a country from a democracy into a tyrannical totalitarian dictatorship. Moreover in their purpose, they further recognized the other reality that a country's standing military can completely be overwhelmed or defeated necessitating a last resort national defense entity made of commoners (re: citizen gun owners always armed with effective weaponry) to amass into "Minuteman" citizenry militias to defend their country fighting off a sinister invading foreign enemy. Consequently with this two-fold safeguard in mind, and as the pivotal and foremost defense of our freedom and preservation of democracy. our Constitution's Second Amendment was created.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays