Preview

Political Differences Between The Patricians And The Plebeian Class

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1014 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Differences Between The Patricians And The Plebeian Class
ROMAN CIVILIZATION
Three Ways the Economic & Political Differences
Between the Patricians & the Plebeian Class
Ultimately Led to a Plebeian Revolt

Introduction:
The Patricians and Plebeian Classes together made up the Roman Republic. To know surprise, they were not entirely treated the same. They did not share equal rights, although both had some rights, unlike slaves. They differed economically and politically. And ultimately, this all led to what would become a plebeian revolt within Rome.

Body: In Ancient Rome, the patricians were “the rich landowners that typically had a house in the city and a villa in the country run by slaves (Rymer, 2014).” They were the aristocrats, republicans, and the upper class ruling class. On the other
…show more content…
It is known that the plebeians and the patricians united in their fight/war to rid of the kings. But there were a number of wars that took place. For the patricians, in times of war, they were protected by the city walls, living a lavish lifestyle. For them, there was no harm, no foul. This was not the case for the plebeians. They already were generally not as wealthy as the patricians. So when they went to war for their country, they were fighting for the good of everyone, not just the patricians. As noted earlier, many of the patricians were farmers, builders, etc. Therefore, most, if not, all of the commoners lived in the countryside. While in war, they abandoned their homes to fight. This left devastating consequences. According to Morey, “when they (the plebeians) were serving in the army, their little farms were neglected, or ravaged by the enemy, their families were driven away, and their property was destroyed. In this way, while serving their country, they were deprived of their houses and fields, and of the means of subsistence, and so were reduced to a condition of poverty and great distress (Morey, …show more content…
Between the mentioned issues such as not being able to sit in the Senate, not being able to hold office, between the plebeians being upset about their land being destroyed in war while the patricians land was protected, and the plebeians being constantly in debt to the patricians was enough to start an uprising. These issues are just scratching the surface though. After the spoils of war, the ruling patricians unfairly and unequally divided and distributed the public land as well as some other things. Needless to say, all in all, a plebeian revolt was bound to occur. The moral of the story, treat people the way you want to be treated. And that is with kindness, love, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Consequences in the Roman Empire were also shown between the patricians and the plebeians. During the fifth century B.C.E, relations between the classes became so strained that the plebeians threatened to succeed from Rome and establish a rival settlement. This eventually led to the establishment of tribunes which altered the Roman government.…

    • 3642 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APWH Rome and China Notes

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages

    c This caused the Patricians to benefit greatly, but the plebeians did not. This caused a larger gap between the rich and poor.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patricians are the type of people that were descendents from the most ancient noble families. The patricians live in large estates, and own lands This also either marry or do business with people from their own class. Along with the plebeians and patricians there was also an emperor, equestrians, the senate, free slaves and slaves. The emperor ruled over the people of Rome and equestrians were affluent landowners, and also people who chose business over politics. Freed slaves are slaves that have been freed by either their master or were bought out of slavery, and slaves are the ones who still work for their masters or sometimes they are generally prisoners of…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Rome Paid A C?

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many protests against the government, and threats for the Plebians to leave. That would make it so that they have no one to rule. However, they did have the twelve tables which are laws written down on tablets. That made it so everybody had to follow the laws. Both Patrician and Plebeian had rules to follow.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, as reported by Priscus, a Roman ambassador(449 CE), who was interviewing a former citizen of Rome: “the condition of Roman subjects during a time of peace [was] worse than war.”(Doc. E) The Roman people were in bad shape because of an unfair law, “taxes [were] very severe, and unprincipled men inflict[ed] injuries on others.”(Doc. E) The dire situation convinced the Roman citizens more and more that they should protest. And when the people did fight back, internal problems surfaced in Rome. However, not only were there harsh taxes causing turmoil, the Roman government was corrupt as well. “The climax of misery is to have to pay in order to obtain justice.”(Doc. E) The rich were bribing the lawmakers so they could get out of facing the law, and the poor didn’t have enough money to get out of punishment as well! Therefore, a great hatred between the rich and the poor was established. Rome may have been able to withstand battles on the outside, but if faced harsh battles within. The patricians believed that they could get away with whatever they wanted to, all they had to do was pay. Murder, theft, abuse and bribery were now tolerated in a place that would not have allowed them to be before. To sum up, Rome’s destruction was induced by legal injustice inside the…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The patricians were the upper and ruling class of the old Roman Empire. Only specific…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why were plebeians so important to Rome? As I said in my written Assignment, plebeians were the lower class, and had little individual power. They included everyone who was not a patrician, senatorial or equestrian class, and were sometimes just called plebs. They were working citizens of Ancient Rome such as: farmers, bakers, builders or craftsmen who worked hard to support their families. The plebeians could not hold any meaningful office, but sit in the senate.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Empire grew larger, so did the Patricians’ estates, or Latifundia, leading to mass unemployment and sensitive areas in society. For instance, when the Romans conquered new lands, “The abundance of slaves led to growth of the latifundia, the great estates that… came to dominate agriculture and ruin the free coloni (farmers) who drifted to the cities, to add to the unemployment there” ( Muller Doc 3). This shows that, the wealthy…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decline Roman Empire

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    government became very weak and unstable. For one, due to the bad leadership the empire had, the people began to become bandits, and crime broke out more in cities and streets. As more fights broke out, the government became weaker and weaker, causing an internal decay to begin to spread throughout the empire. This decay eventually grew and reached a point where it was unable to be fixed, causing the empire to crumble. Patricians were the higher class citizens in the empire, and they often took more roles in the government than the plebeians, which were the regular class citizens. Not having as big of a role in the government led for more issues to arise. Military factors also caused for this internal decay to spread and led to the fall of Rome as well.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For an exchange to take place there has to be five conditions that are met. The first one is that they must be at least two parties. In this case it would be the company Netflix and the customers. Second each party must have something that would be of value to the other party. Netflix has the DVDs that customers want to watch and the customers have money to pay for them. They also have DVDs that need to be returned to Netflix after watching them. Each party has to be capable of communication and delivery. Netflix has 34 strategically placed warehouses it uses to ship out the DVDs. They also have live operators to help out if there are any questions. The customers receive a paid packaging from Netflix to return the DVDs to the company. Each party has to be free to accept or reject the exchange offer. The customers can call the operators if they feel they haven’t received good service. The customers also have a choice of which subscription plan they would like to choose. Finally each party believes it’s desirable to deal with the other party. Netflix has a lot of options for their customers making them easy to work with.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Table of content Chapter 1 1.1 Introduction ………………………………………… page 5 Chapter 2 2.1.0 Trends of Industry …………… ……………………. 2.1.1 Increasing in the demand for petrochemical product ……page 6 2.1.2 Lesser price elasticity ………………………………………page 6 2.1.3 Oversupply ………………………………………………….page 6, 7 2.1.4 Lean and Mean ……………………………………………..…

    • 9659 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays