Power Sharing in India

1
Articles
Student Conflict Resolution, Power “Sharing” in Schools, and Citizenship Education
KATHY BICKMORE
University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
ABSTRACT
One goal of elementary education is to help children develop the skills, knowledge, and values associated with citizenship. However, there is little consensus about what these goals really mean: various schools, and various programs within any school, may promote different notions of “good citizenship.” Peer conflict mediation, like service learning, creates active roles for young people to help them develop capacities for democratic citizenship (such as critical reasoning and shared decision making). This study examines the notions of citizenship embodied in the contrasting ways one peer mediation model was implemented in six different elementary schools in the same urban school district. This program was designed to foster leadership among diverse young people, to develop students’ capacities to be responsible citizens by giving them tangible responsibility, specifically the power to initiate and carry out peer conflict management activities. In practice, as the programs developed, some schools did not share power with any of their student mediators, and other schools shared power only with the kinds of children already seen as “good” students. All of the programs emphasized the development of nonviolent community norms—a necessary but not sufficient condition for democracy. A few programs began to engage students in critical reasoning and/or in taking the initiative in influencing the management of problems at their schools, thus broadening the space for democratic learning. These case studies help to clarify what our visions of citizenship
(education) may look and sound like in actual practice so that we can deliberate about the choices thus highlighted. What does it mean to teach children to be “good citizens”? Through informal socialization, including the hidden curriculum of

References: or contact the director, Carole Close, CCR, c/o Martin Luther King HS, 1651 East 71st Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44103 USA ([e-mail]).31 mixed and mainly working-class populations, in the same urban district. Enrolment information is from building profiles (CPS, 1997); achievement results are from the accountability report (CPS, 1998), based on a district average pass rate (for grade 4) of 17 percent in spring 1998. Avery, P. 1994. The future of political participation in civic education. In The Future of the social studies, ed Battistoni, R. 1997. Service learning and democratic citizenship. Theory Into Practice 36 (3): 150–56. Bergsgaard, M. 1997. Gender issues in the implementation and evaluation of a violenceprevention curriculum. Canadian Journal of Education 22 (1): 33–45. Bettman, E., and P. Moore. 1994. Conflict resolution programs and social justice. Education and Urban Society 27 (1): 11–21. Bickmore, K., with J. Looney, and P. Goldthwait. 1984. Alternatives to violence: A manual for teaching peacemaking to youth and adults (ERIC ED #250 254) Bickmore, K. 1996. Women in the world, women in the classroom: gender equity in the social studies ———. 1997. Preparation for pluralism: curricular and extra-curricular practice with conflict resolution ———. 1999a. Elementary curriculum about conflict resolution: Can children handle global politics? Theory and Research in Social Education 27 (1): 45–69. ———. 1999b. Teaching conflict and conflict resolution: Extra-curricular considerations. In How children understand war and peace, ed Bottery, M. 1992. Education, dissent, and the internationalisation of schooling. Westminster Studies in Education 15 [AUTHOR: Issue number please.]: 69–78. Brantlinger, E. 1994. The social class embeddedness of middle school students’ thinking about teachers **Bryson, M. 1993. Peacemaking in our schools: Peer mediation programs. Green Teacher 34 (June/September): 13–14. Burns, L. 1998. Make sure it’s service learning, not just community service. Education Digest 64 (2): 38–41 **Cameron, J., and A. Dupuis. 1991. The introduction of school mediation to New Zealand. Carruthers, W., B. Carruthers, N. Day-Vines, D. Bostick, and D. Watson. 1996. Conflict resolution as curriculum: a definition, description, and process for integration in core Conrad, D., and D. Hedin. 1977. Learning and earning citizenship through participation. In Building rationales for citizenship education, ed Constitutional Rights Foundation. 1993. Service learning in the social studies. Chicago, IL: author. **Davis, G. 1994. Don’t fight, mediate. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice 3 (2): 85–94. Day-Vines, N., B. Day-Hairston, W. Carruthers, J. Wall, and H. Lupton-Smith. 1996. Conflict resolution: The value of diversity in the recruitment, selection, and training of peer **Deutsch, M. 1993. Educating for a peaceful world. American Psychologist 48 (5): 510–17.33 **Glass, R **Greenberg, B. 1995. Identifying and resolving conflict in multicultural settings. NASSP Bulletin 79 (567): 51–61. Hahn, C. 1996. Empirical research on issues-centered social studies. In Handbook on issuescentered social studies, eds. R. Evans and D. Saxe, Bulletin #93, 25–41. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies. **Harris, I. 1996. From world peace to peace in the “hood”: peace education in a postmodern world Hedin, D., and D. Conrad. 1992. Service: a pathway to knowledge. Journal of Cooperative Education 27 (2): 73–84. Hepburn, M. 1983. Can schools, teachers, and administrators make a difference? In Democratic education in schools and classrooms, ed ———. 1997. Service learning in civic education: a concept with long, sturdy roots. Theory Into Practice 36 (3): 136–42. Hess, D. 1997. Violence prevention and service learning. Social Education 61 (5): 279–81. Houser, N. 1996. Negotiating dissonance and safety for the common good: social education in the elementary classroom **Howard, R., and R. Kenny. 1992. Education for democracy: promoting citizenship and critical reasoning through school governance **Ingersoll, R. 1996. Teachers’ decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education 69 (2): 159–76. Johnson, D., and R. Johnson. 1996. Conflict resolution and peer mediation programs in elementary and secondary schools: A review of the research Kahne, J., and J. Westheimer. 1996. In the service of what? The politics of service learning. Phi Delta Kappan (April).34 Kamii, C. 1991. Toward autonomy: the importance of critical thinking and choice making. School Psychology Review 20 (3): 382–88. **Keith, K. 1971. The silent majority: the problem of apathy and the student council. **Koch, M. 1988. Mediated dispute resolution—resolving disputes: students can do it better. **Koskinen, J., R. Shadden, and S. Steffan. 1972, Toward a democratic student government. In Youth as a minority: An anatomy of student rights, ed Larson, M. 1991. Intergroup relations and school discipline. Equity Coalition 2 (1): 13–18. Lawton, M. 1994. Violence-prevention curricula: What works best? Education Week (November 9): 1, 10–11. Leal, R. 1994. Conflicting views of discipline in San Antonio schools. Education and Urban Society 27 (1): 35–44.