Pro-choice Arguments

Arguments in support of my thesis
1)Making abortion illegal doesn't stop abortion, it just makes it less safe. The number of women getting abortions doesn't change, the thing that changes is that women die from having unsafe abortions. 78,000 women die every year from having unsafe abortions.
2) Religious ideaology is no foundation for any laws. We do not have laws prohibiting the eating of pork nor do we have laws against pre-martial sex. Laws should be based off of logical reasoning from the point of general and secular beliefs, not the beliefs of one specific religion or group. Our country was founded under these principles of freedom from religious fundamentalism.
3)Most people who are against abortion will never become pregnant and have absolutley no first hand experience in the burdens of pregnancy. The majority of pro-life supporters are men.(according to gallup-poll) These pro-life people can't fully understand what it would be like to be forced to carry an unwanted child or to be forced to become a single parent.
4)Women who are raped or victims of incest should not be forced to carry out a pregnancy. This goes with my third argument, in that the pro-life men don't consider what a rape victim might feel. Imagine going through the horrible experience of a rape and then being forced to keep the child because a group of more oppressive men won't let the woman have her freedom.
5)Women shouldn't allow themselves to be told what to do by men anymore. Pro-life laws are just another lingering effect of the sexist days where men can madate everything a woman is allowed to do.
6) Many "pro-life" choices are far worse for the child than abortion. Babies born addicted to drugs, such as cocaine or pain killers. Babies born in poverty. Babies who are born with a terminal illness.
Questions I need to address:
1)Adoption is the "better alternative". Many orphans grow up with mental instability (according to ehow.com) Further, many of the pro-life supporters never apply for adoption.
2)The women should take responsibility for their actions. Once again hypocritical because the pro-life party is advocating that people should never be allowed to make mistakes. This argument also ignores all the women who had pregnancy forced upon them.
3)It's not up to the government to determine when life begins. This is hypocritical because these same people are arguing that it is up to the government to determine a woman's right to abortion.
4) The one-time choice of abortion robs someone else of a lifetime of choices and prevents him from ever exercising his rights. But is it the child's choice to be born addicted to drugs or born in poverty. Or what about a child who is born with a terminal illness? They're going to die painfully anyway so there wasn't really a choice to begin with.
Related logical fallacies