Pro Death Penalty

The death penalty has been in place in the United States since its foundation, however in the last few decades it has become increasingly controversial. In recent years, many people have begun to question whether it is an effective method of punishment, or if the death penalty should remain. In a perfect world capital punishment, would be an acceptable punishment, however in our society there are many outside factors that have influenced and challenged the efficacy and efficiency of the death penalty. From execution methods to wrongful convictions, there are numerous issues that plague capital punishment. Opponents of the death penalty claim that life in prison should be the alternative punishment for crimes such as murder. While many murderers
Capital punishment is a well-known form of punishment in America, therefore if one is to kill, then it should be assumed that they also likely know of the inherent risks of doing so. There would be no need for a death penalty if people did no kill others. To seek retribution or revenge for those who have been killed is a logical form of punishment. Killing a murderer not only sends a message to future potential murderers, but it may bring some peace to the family of the decedent. If the family of decedent wishes for the death penalty, then it is only fair to attempt to sentence the murderer in that fashion. By knowing that is the families wish, the jury and judge and assume that is also likely the same position the victim would have held. Thus, the murderer will not only be punished fairly, but also in a means in which the victim likely would have agreed with. When victims of crimes are alive, they have a say in the punishment process and pressing charges, however if the victim is dead they have lost all say in how the offender is punished. If the victim has family, it is essential to include them in the debate of what is a fair punishment, without their knowledge of the victim the form of punishment administered may not reflect the ideals of the deceased victim. If the murderer is left in prison for life the
Capital punishment has been a part of American society since before the constitution, however in todays’ climate it has become a much more contentious topic. All things being equal and fair, the death penalty is a suitable punishment for a select number of crimes. It is a very complex issue, and context on the crime is essential. If the murder was a crime of passion versus a premeditated killing, changes the entire reason for killing and will also change the outcome in trial. Even in the twenty-first century, America is plagued by racial issues and divide. These issues become extremely apparent when confronting the death penalty. Based upon the disproportionate targeting of African Americans for the death penalty, and slow speed in which it can be carried out, the death penalty is currently not and adequate form of punishment. If inmates can be incarcerated without definitive proof, and executed upon falsities, or held nearly indefinitely until it is finally carried out, then it is not an effective form of punishment. Killing a murderer or traitor, if proven guilty, is acceptable; but in America it is never that