Preview

Race As Social Construction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3245 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Race As Social Construction
State: laws enacted to control intimate relations
Culture: way of life, traditions, shared practices
Race: group of people; socially constructed
Ethnicity: group of people who share cultures and practices
What is Race?
Race as a biological construction
“biological race”: view of race that are hereditary. Terms like Black, White, and Asian. Ancestors determine membership in genetically defined racial group
Race as social construction
“race” is a vast group of people loosely bounded by historically contingent, socially significant elements of morphology and/or ancestry. Ongoing, contradictory, self-reinforcing process subject to macro forces of social and political struggle and micro effects of daily decisions
The GROUPING OF PEOPLE
…show more content…
Miscegenation first appeared during presidential election of 1864; before miscegenation the term used to refer to 2 diff races marrying was amalgamation
Refers to “mixture of two or more races”
Promotes notion that interracial marriage is unnatural
1878 – marriage of black and white voided in VA; first miscegenation until 1967, that notion stood as taken-for-granted basis of American laws and policy in 1864, various states, not just in South, prohibited interracial marriages miscegenation applied not only to whites and blacks, but also Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, American, Indians, native Hawaiians, and south Asians did not apply to Mexican Americans – Mexicans are considered white when it comes to interracial marriages e.g.: Kirby case
Joe Kirby Case
March 21, 1921: Kirby seeks annulment from wife of 7 yrs, MayallenKirby wants annulment based Arizona’s legal prohibition of marriages between “persons of Caucasian blood, or their descendants” and “negroes, Mongolians, or Indians and their descendants”
Miscegenation laws technically applied to all races alike but they only applied to prohibition of whites marrying other groups
Pressure of “equal application” led other states to pass laws that only applied to
…show more content…
By removing any explicit language of race in favor of national origin as basis for exclusin and at saem time introducing homosexuality and adultery EXPLICLTY in determining eligibility for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mildred Jeter, an African-American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, went to Washington, D.C, to get married and avoid Virginia’s interracial marriage ban. When they returned to Virginia not long after, the Lovings were arrested under the charges of violating Virginia’s interracial marriage ban.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law, but as we read carefully about it, it states that it gives “preferential treatment on basis of sex,…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A&E Networks Television, 10 Nov. 2016. Web. 05 Apr. 2017. Wang, Wendy. " Interracial Marriage: Who Is 'marrying Out'?"…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia Essay

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In June of 1958, Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving married in the District of Columbia. They were residents of Virginia but due to Virginia’s laws they weren’t able to marry within their state. The state of Virginia prevented marriages based on racial classification. After the couple married they returned to their home state in Caroline County where they were then charged for violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages. The Loving’s went to court and was sentenced to a year in jail. However, the judge suspended the trial for twenty-five years on the condition that the Loving’s wouldn’t return to Virginia for those twenty-five years.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statutes were clearly drawn upon race-based distinctions because the legality of certain behavior turned on the races of the people engaging in it. Equal Protection requires that classifications based on race be subject to intense scrutiny for this reason. The Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits classifications drawn by any statute that constitutes subjective and hateful discrimination. The fact that Virginia would focus on bans of interracial marriages involving whites is proof that the miscegenation statutes exist for no other purpose other than the independent goals of those based on racial discrimination. This case was essential in providing a firm foundation, that it is not possible, for a state law to be valid, which makes the criminality of an act depend upon the race of the actor.…

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Race is essentially a “social construct” and has little relations to biological distinctions among humans. Race was a multicolored pyramid created to put whites on top and blacks on the bottom. It was a device created by Anglo Saxons who felt empowered and race was a tool they molded in order to stay in power.…

    • 2679 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving V. Virginia Case

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Leaving State to evade law. – If any white person and colored person shall go out of this State, for the purpose of being married, and with the intention of…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Government

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case is also significant because it is about how the United States defined marriage. Before 1967, a legal marriage could not be contracted in states with anti-miscegenation laws if the partners were of different races.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Cases

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A interracial couple in Virginia were planning to get married. When they signed the papers for the marriage to happen, the state saw that they were different races. The state canceled the marriage and sent the two lovers to jail as it went against as it is a "...felony for a white person to intermarry with a black person or a black person to intermarry with a white person." The couples appealed their arrest to the Supreme Court of Virginia. The court ruled with the state, stating that it preserved "racial integrity". Years after the couples were released from prison, the judgement of the Supreme Court of Virginia was proved wrong later by Justice Potter Stewart, a experienced politician, argued that it doesn't go with the equal rights protection in the constitution. Quickly, the law was removed from…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loving vs. Virgina

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Having no other choice, the couple moved back to the District of Columbia in Washington D. C. to be together. They soon initiated a suit in 1963 challenging the constitutionality of the anti-miscegenation law. The two believed that the…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interracial Marriages

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The law forbidding interracial marriage was terminated in 1967, and in the midst of rapid racial change, one fact is unmistakable: A growing number of Americans are showing that we all can get along by forming relationships and families that cross all color lines. In the past couple decades, the number of interracial marriages has increased dramatically. Interracial dating and marrying is described as the dating or marrying of two people of different races, and it is becoming much more common to do so. Thirty years ago, only one in every 100 children born in the United States was of mixed race. Today, the number is one in 19. In some states, such as California and Washington, the number is closer to one in 10 (Melting Pot).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, she believes that interracial marriages still face difficult times in society; especially when one of the partners is an undocumented individual (Schueths, 2015). Schueths (2015) declares that even though 50 years have passed since the prohibition of interracial marriages was considered unconstitutional, interracial marriages still experience discrimination. According to Schueths (2015), before 1967, most of the 50 states did not allow Black individuals to marry White individuals; neither Chinese to marry White individuals. According to Solsberry (1994), a couple was arrested on 1958 in Virginia because they were married; the male individual was White, and the female was African American. This type of arrests existed against interracial marriages 50 years ago. However, after the Supreme Court outlaw the prohibition of interracial marriages in 1967, now individuals can get married with whoever they desire. Solsberry (1994) explains that even though it is not against the law for interracial couples to get married, these couples still experience disapproval from society and from their family…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalizing Gay Marriage

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marriage in the US is a secular and dynamic institution that has gone under several major transformations. Interracial marriage was illegal in many US states until a 1967 Supreme Court decision. Coverture, where a woman's legal rights and economic identity were subsumed by her husband upon marriage, was commonplace in 19th century America. No-fault divorce has changed the institution of marriage since its introduction in California on Jan. 1, 1970. Nancy Cott, PhD, testified in Perry v. Schwarzenegger that "[c]ivil law has always been supreme in defining and regulating marriage” and that religious leaders are accustomed to performing marriages only because the state has given them that authority.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interracial marriages has been fully legalized in all U.S. states since the 1967 Supreme Court decision that deemed anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional in Virginia and 15 other…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Love Has No Color

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Partners amongst interracial relationships have been experienced and full of content ever since the 1600s. From laws of abolishment to the percentage of young America whom take part in an interracial romance, this particular group of individuals who believe in miscegenation didn’t let anything nor anyone interfere with their right to love. The battle has ended but still raises eyebrows to some individuals who just can’t accept the fact of anyone marrying outside of their race till this very day. Even though it may seem wrong to some, their judgment can’t ever out-beat the amount of courage and pride a couple may share, the Loving vs. Virginia case is definitely the perfect example of a such couple.…

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays