Reply Women Should Be Homemakers
A very good morning to the speaker of the house, wise adjudicators, timekeepers, fellow ministers of the government, members of the opposition, and fellow parliamentarians of this august house. I am 2nd speaker of the government side, and will be presenting my team’s reply speech.
Our motion for today is ‘This house believes that it is better for women to be homemakers than to pursue a career". We as the government strongly support this motion and have given you solid reasons to support our stand. Now ladies and gentlemen, we shall tell you why the opposition’s points are weak and should not be accepted, whereas our stand’s points are strong and reliable.
Now I will show you, members of the house, why we, the government’s argument is stronger. Our first point is it is better for women to be homemakers than to pursue a career as women are genetically primed to take care of children. Members of the floor, in 1979, a mere seven percent of stay-at-home mothers all around the world increased to 27 percent in 2009! “If the young child develops best at home, then it is the greater loss for him and ultimately society, if he is sent elsewhere.” Said Raymond & Dorothy Moore, the author of “Better Late Than Early”. It is imperative for children to have a stable secure home life and working mothers cannot create that stability. If you decide to have children, you should understand that they come before a career, why would you be stunned over someone raising her children property? Has the world become so jaded that we expect the children to raise themselves?
Our second point is there is gender discrimination in the workplace. According to a research made by Collegetimes, only 40% of employers provide at least some replacement pay during periods of maternity leave. Despite the fact that the arrival of a child means extra bills and expenses, many employers don’t provide women with any benefits if they to leave work temporarily to have a child. Women earned less than men in 99%
Our motion for today is ‘This house believes that it is better for women to be homemakers than to pursue a career". We as the government strongly support this motion and have given you solid reasons to support our stand. Now ladies and gentlemen, we shall tell you why the opposition’s points are weak and should not be accepted, whereas our stand’s points are strong and reliable.
Now I will show you, members of the house, why we, the government’s argument is stronger. Our first point is it is better for women to be homemakers than to pursue a career as women are genetically primed to take care of children. Members of the floor, in 1979, a mere seven percent of stay-at-home mothers all around the world increased to 27 percent in 2009! “If the young child develops best at home, then it is the greater loss for him and ultimately society, if he is sent elsewhere.” Said Raymond & Dorothy Moore, the author of “Better Late Than Early”. It is imperative for children to have a stable secure home life and working mothers cannot create that stability. If you decide to have children, you should understand that they come before a career, why would you be stunned over someone raising her children property? Has the world become so jaded that we expect the children to raise themselves?
Our second point is there is gender discrimination in the workplace. According to a research made by Collegetimes, only 40% of employers provide at least some replacement pay during periods of maternity leave. Despite the fact that the arrival of a child means extra bills and expenses, many employers don’t provide women with any benefits if they to leave work temporarily to have a child. Women earned less than men in 99%