Preview

Research Paper On Cesare Beccaria

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research Paper On Cesare Beccaria
Cesare Beccaria
Makenzie Strange

Cesare Beccaria is referred to as "the father of classical criminal theory." (New World Encyclopedia , 2015 ) His writing has made a significant impact on things as great as the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Beccaria has even argued against the death penalty, and in some cases, has convinced some nations to alter the law of the fatal punishment. With his determination and assistance of his colleagues , he was able to write, and publish, one of the most referred pieces in political history.

On March 15th, 1738, a well-known philosopher was born in the city of Milan, Italy. Thus, his journey to success had begun. Beccaria received a Jesuit education and studied the Baron de Montesquieu which directed his attention towards economics. By 1758 he had received his degree. In 1762, he was untied with his friends, Alessandro & Pietro Verri. These three men formed a private society called the "Academy of Fists." Henry Paolucci stated, "The group was dedicated to waging relentless war against economic disorder, bureaucratic petty tyranny, religious narrow-mindedness, and intellectual pedantry." (Constitution.org , 2015) Beccaria made his first publication in this year, with the help of the
…show more content…
He argued that punishment is justified only to defend the social contract, and that the type of punishment chosen should serve the greatest public good. He expresses his disapproval of the death penalty by arguing that: " first the state does not possess the right to take lives; and second, that capital punishment is neither a useful nor necessary form of punishment." ( New World Encyclopedia, 2015 ) Beccaria saw the death penalty as a form of revenge. He saw punishment as wag to prevent crime from reoccurring. He argued against the severity of punishment, believing that it is certainty, not severity, that has the preventive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cesare Beccaria Theory

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, the boys fail to effectively govern themselves based on Cesare Beccaria’s idea that a successful government must have an equal and fair justice system. Beccaria was a famous philosopher who lived through the 18th century and believed that it is vital for governments to establish a fair justice system in order to enforce the laws (“Cesare Beccaria”). He deduced that bad law enforcement promotes immorality in society and many innocent people may face punishments that they don’t deserve (“Cesare Beccaria”). Furthermore, Beccaria suggested that a reformed justice system would also match the level of punishment to the severity of the crime in order to maintain a balance (“Cesare Beccaria”). This theory states that an effective government requires an equitable and equal justice system, because without this component, anarchy is bound to overcome…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beccaria’s arguments (Bessler, 2009). Bradford questioned the necessity of capital punishment and argued for the elimination of it for all offenses except high treason and murder until more…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beccaria’s argument pertaining to crime comprised of a number of ideas. Due to criminal laws placing restrictions on individual freedoms, he believed they should be restricted in scope (Smith, 2016, p. 35). He also argued that the guiding principle in the administration of justice should be the presumption of innocence (Smith, 2016, p. 35). Beccaria also believed the complete criminal law code should be written and should define all offenses and punishments in advance, also that punishment should be based on retributive reasoning. Another component of his argument included the severity of the punishment should be limited and should not go beyond what is necessary for crime prevention and deterrence (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014, p. 37).…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which is related to that of Cesare Beccaria, they have the same dispute that murder intended and carried out by the state was the worst kind. Camus states, that he does not base his argument on sympathy for the convicted but on reasonable grounds and on proven statistics. Camus also disputes that capital punishment is an easy alternative for the government where improvement and change may be possible.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical theories of punishment were based on the concept that applying fearful consequences to criminals would discourage any potential offenders. During the late 1700’s, a criminologist by the name of Cesar Beccaria argued the fact that the death penalty served no purpose as a form of punishment, let alone as a deterrence to criminals. He advocated to reform the criminal justice system through penology, concerning specifically with punishment and deterrence (Beccaria, 2009). In the following essay, Beccaria’s theory of punishment will be thoroughly…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Era Punishment

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cesare Beccaria was the author of On Crimes and Punishments. His essay was about condemning torture and the capital punishment and reformation. His essay would later be used as a guide for constructing the Bill of Rights and the U.S Constitution. He had a social contract view of society in which everyone agreed that the Lawmaker was the sovereign power who alone represented the will of all the people. He believed an effective punishment should be swift, certain, impartial, universal, and proportionate to the crime. Deterrence depends upon learning on associating cause and effect. The sooner the punishment follows on the crime, the stronger the association in the mind of the criminal. When judges stray from the punishment set…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cesare Beccaria made many contributions to the enlightenment, some even affect our lives today. He is well remembered for his famous and influential criminology essay “On Crimes And Punishments” that was published in 1764, this book explains the idea of criminal justice. Because of this book Beccaria is was and still is considered the greatest thinker of the enlightenment. In his book was where the idea of torture and the death penalty first originated. The three main ideas Cesare put in his book were free will, rational manner, and manipulability. Cesare knew his ideas that were in his book may cause controversy among the people during the enlightenment, so he published it anonymously because he feared that the government would lash out at…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment elaborated on the controversy of whether or not certain punishments were barbarous. One man, named Caesare Beccaria yearned to abolish malevolent punishments. “Is the death penalty really useful and necessary for the security and good order of society? Are torture and torments just, and do they attain the end for which laws are instituted” (Beccaria). Beccaria essentially sought for just indictments of respective crimes, as opposed to death and torture. In modern society in the US, the eighth amendment protects the citizens from undergoing cruel and unusual punishments as a way to indict someone for committing a crime. However, in certain places, cruel and unusual punishments still exist. Many terrorist groups will perform beheadings or lynch people, as a way of punishment. In the Philippines, “... a Malaysian kidnap victim was beheaded by Abu Sayyaf militants in the southern Philippines on Tuesday after a large ransom demand was not paid, two military officials said.” ( ). Due to the failure of the Philippine government to make payment to the militants, they responded by punishing a man, which they kidnapped, by means of execution. The Enlightenment was able to essentially revoke the cruel and harsh punishments imparted upon people, however, only to a certain extent, as in certain parts of the world, hellish punishments still…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Upon arriving in Paris, it was clear that Beccaria did not fit in with the other enlightened intellectuals. They thought of his as “childish imbecile without backbone and unable of living away from his mother (Paoucci, pg xv). Beccaria left Paris without finishing his trip. After Paris he distanced himself from his friends also leaving “academy of fists” and went to Austria where he was not well known and worked quietly for the Austrian government. Away from the support of his friends, he never wrote anything else that was worthy of publication. Beccaria died in 1794. After his death his legend in France and England grew. Many people at that time thought that Beccaria was silenced by the suppression of a tyrannical government. They did not care to know or admit that he brought the silence upon himself. Beccaria is still remembered today as a father of classical criminal theory, and as a literally champion of the cause of humanity. His treatise, “On Crimes and punishments” had a large and lasting impact on the American Constitution, the Bill of Rights and our criminal justice system. So while he only wrote one worthy, published essay, his influence is still felt…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences plant a generalization on crime that fails to account for the context in which the crime is committed. If there are not interpretation and adjudical of a crime in its entirety, mandatory minimum sentences have imposed harsher punishment to individuals who do not deserve it. Nevertheless, mandatory minimum sentences ultimately go on to satisfy Beccaria’s views on punishment because it allows the punishment to be certain and…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays