As an accomplished chess player, Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications equipment giant is planning to do a smart move again. The likely acquisition of Nokia seems to be part of a structured strategy that they have been implemented since 2003 when they started to diversify toward other units business. Therefore, this essay will analyse from the resource-based view the different strategic moves that this company has implemented in order to strengthen its handsets business unit and the implications that would entail the acquisition of Nokia, if it was to materialize.
The core business of Huawei during its first 18 years of existence was offering network technologies and solutions, also providing equipment to build and operate them. This technology-development focus, allowed them to develop and amass a set of resources and capabilities that have been deployed in its aim of diversifying its core business. Although resources such as, technical skills, R&D expertise and technology have been clearly an important foundation for strategizing, this essay will place emphasis in other key resources and capabilities that Huawei was able to leverage in order to first, entry in the handset devises market and second, to gain gradually presence on it.
The first key resource was “the relational capital”. In 2013, Huawei already had important contracts and join-venture agreements with some of the most important mobile operators worldwide. Impelled for this context, Huawei´s first strategy to enter handsets market was producing initially “white label” versions for its network-operator customers. Huawei’s managers understood their own limitation as to lack of brand-awareness in final consumer, thus, they focused on maximizing other resources such as its own image, prestige and bargaining power among network operators through producing their private labels.
However, Huawei strategy of focusing initially in the B2B segment was just the first element of a structured strategy that will end up in its current focus on positioning its own brand. Once Huawei amassed enough resources, such as branding awareness and expertise in the handset industry while also developed marketing capabilities they felt that it was the right moment to concentrate efforts in its own brand (Huawei’s own brand sales moved from 20% in 2011 to 85% in 2012). Although that move implied heavy investing in branding strategy, its massive financial resources could readily afford it. Huawei understood that in long term, the development of its own brand would be more profitable, allowing the creation of switching costs as well as shielding its share market.
Also, thanks to the capability of influencing the handsets Industry, Huawei was able to leverage its position as a newcomer. As a strong player in the telecommunication industry, Huawei was able to understand as few, the direction that would take the mobile devices industry. Initially, focusing in cheap and “basic features” phones they took advantage of the fast development of new generations of networking technologies, and later on, focusing its strengths on producing smartphones devices. As a result, Huawei is now the third-largest manufacturer of smartphones by volume behind Samsung and Apple, manufacturing devices with similar specifications than them but cheaper.
During the brief 10 years of existence of its handset business unit, Huawei´s strategic decisions have relied on the deployment of existing resources and at the same time the development of the future firm resource base. However, with the likely acquisition of Nokia seems to be that Huawei’s ambitious goes further. Huawei’s approach to strategy is now also concerned with leveraging external and transferable resources. Through this acquisition, Huawei would seek to leverage a large resource from its competitor to broaden the firm´s strategic opportunities. Among many others, the most craved Nokia’s resources could be its brand awareness, its portfolio of products and its technical expertise.
While Nokia seems to have failed in its approach to conquer the smartphones segment, they still keep a dominant position in “feature” phones category worldwide, having strong brand positioning in some massive markets such as India. Although smartphones “boom” has been overwhelming, features phones category continues with the majority share of global handsets market (51%). One acquisition like this would allow Huawei to extract the Nokia’s capability of spreading throughout several markets where the Chinese firm is weak, and also, to expand its portfolio of products covering all possible categories.
In addition, Nokia’s technical expertise and the Huawei’s innovation dynamic could finalize with interesting synergies due to the combination of their resources and capabilities. For example, the ability of establish a cost–advantage of Huawei, could be leveraged by Nokia developing superior technology processes, accessing to low-wage labour and so on. Similarly, some of the attributes of Nokia devices such as reliability and battery durability could be transferred to Huawei´s smartphones and vice-versa. Even more, this new pool of resources, could be leveraged in the current effort of Huawei to diversification through the development of new products, such as wearable devices which could challenge against Google glasses or Apple watches.
Finally, the acquisition of Nokia could be also a smart move to sort out the main constraining factors of the Industry. Just as it is expressed for Huawei’s CEO in the article, the shortage of components and slowing manufacturing have affected the potential growth for them in this segment. The acquisition of this pool of resources would allow Huawei to be placed in a different position over its rivals, achieving new economies of scale and being able to ensure component supply over time. It is important to remark that regardless its current “down turn”, Nokia is still the second mobile manufacturer, just behind Samsung.
In conclusion, Huawei has been able to maximize rents over time, through strategizing around the most critically important resources and existing capabilities, but also through “filling its resource gap” which has allowed them to build up the foundation for subsequent strategic moves. However, the Huawei’s strategic mindset is not that simple, perhaps the statement of Penrose in “the growth of the firm” summarizes what Huawei is currently pursuing with Nokia acquisition: “Available resources limit expansion, but unused resources stimulate and largely determine the direction of expansion”.
Julian Arias – Mba. MGSM . Sydney , Australia.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Technological: In the past three decades, a major shift in technology has prevailed in the mobile handset industry. Through innovation and technological advances, the market shifted from analog transmissions (1G), to digital mobile communications in 1992 (also known as 2G), and ultimately to the Wideband Data Communications network (3G). With rapid changes in this dynamic marketplace only the most well-funded and well-managed companies have managed to emerge from generation to generation, whilst others have been unsuccessful.…
- 1566 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Blagdon, Jeff. "Huawei backs out of US network equipment market, citing ‘geopolitical reasons’." www.theverge.com.N.p. Web. 13 Nov 2013. .…
- 1579 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
* Whether Huawei can replicate its low-end telecom networking success in its high-end technology products and services.…
- 1124 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this case study will discuss the strengths, weakness, opportunity’s and threats of the Vertu Nokia mobile phone. How well the company did and what the company will do to be completive in today’s changing world of mobile phones.…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
External market size and growth has been a root cause of Blackberry’s revenue problems. Blackberry’s global market share declined to 5% in 2012 from 20% in 2009 (Palenchar, 2013). Blackberry lost four million subscribers in the last quarter, bringing total subscribers to 72 million (Connors, 2013). This happened primarily because Blackberry is falling to woo customers with its products. For example, Blackberry introduced the new Z10 smartphone, but instead of selling satisfying numbers of the new Z10 smartphones, Blackberry sold 3.7 million of its old cellphone inventories. The cost of producing the Z10 is not covered with the revenue Blackberry is producing. Another factor is the lack of innovation at Blackberry (Hessman, 2013). Blackberry is losing revenue because it cannot keep pace with innovators and competitors such as Apple, Google, and Samsung. From the start, Blackberry had trouble adjusting to market (Hessman, 2013). When Apple introduced the iPhone in 2007, Blackberry knew that Apple’s new phone is innovating, but Blackberry failed to change itself to adjust to the market accordingly. Blackberry was not willing to take risk and today it faces the same problem. Since there is no innovation at Blackberry, customers…
- 730 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Over the past 30 years, the mobile industry has grown massively and took lots of interesting turns in terms of companies leading such industry and companies sharing larger portions to serve customers throughout changes and development for their products to keep up with customer’s demand. In this course project, I will study the changes that both Samsung and Nokia have gone through in the past 9 years; the study will focus on two main elements:…
- 2598 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
The following report details cell phone industry analysis, which deals with cell phone manufacturers as well as cell phone services. This analysis includes the dominant economic characteristics, Six Forces of Competition (Porter’s Five Forces of Competition), driving forces of the cell phone industry, strategic mapping of company strengths, the ease entry and exit into the cell phone industry, and the overall industry outlook.…
- 3525 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Being ranked No. 1 of “most influential Chinese business leaders” by Fortune China in three consecutive years from 2011 to 2013, Zhengfei Ren, the founder, controlling shareholder and CEO of Huawei is almost regarded as hero of the company.1 He has been the man who is influencing and inspiring the whole company since it was founded in 1987. Now, Huawei is a global leading company in ICT (information and communication technology) solution with revenue in 2012 more than 35 billion dollars.2 The magic rise of Huawei is largely attributed to the family based strongman culture with strong executive force from the top and ability to make long-term planning, but, as far as I can see, will hardly ensure future success.…
- 1693 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Huawei is a leading telecom solutions provider. Through continuous customer-oriented innovation, Huawei has established end-to-end advantages in telecom network infrastructure, application & software, devices and professional services. The vision of Huawei is to enrich people's lives through communication and the mission of the company is to focus on customers’ market challenges and needs by providing excellent communications network solutions and services in order to consistently create maximum value for customers.…
- 602 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
HUAWEI GLOBALISATION CASE STUDY (Sourced from: Donglin Wu and Fang Zhao, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol.3 No.1. March 2007, Pp.183 – 196). 1. The Profile of Huawei Huawei Technologies P/L was founded in 1988.…
- 1521 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It talks about business strategy of one of the leading cell phone organization in the country and how it is changing its business strategy to adapt to the changing environment.…
- 284 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to mobi Thinking, in 2011, there were only five firms that control the current market. Since start-up costs for a mobile phone manufacturer are extremely high, the threat of new entrants is low. A large amount of money must be invested into the development of new technology. Also, it is difficult to enter the market with existing firms already operating on cost and different strategies…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
of Huawei in such a short period of time? Here I would apply two different…
- 2835 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
subsequent changes that Nokia is making to its strategy. The competitiveness of Germany is also discussed…
- 370 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Deregulation, globalization, and introduction of new technologies such as the 4G networks and VoIP have forced the telecommunications companies to reconsider their strategy, their technological base and their product portfolio. In that context, companies have tried to develop and gain access to desired capabilities and resources and expanded across national boundaries to sustain their competitive advantages.…
- 3221 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays