Contrasting two very different schools in different cities in the same region, the book argues that white racial identity formation must be understood by reference to processes of, "(1) association with people of color; (2) 'us-them' boundary making processes; (3) the …show more content…
ways class, gender and other identities interplay and influence one another; (4) the multi-racial self; and (5) the meanings derived from the structural-institutional context" (p. 180).
Perry draws extensively on young white students' voices, at times juxtaposing these with the language and self-descriptions of peers of color and of mixed heritage. The author intentionally makes room for long quotations from students, so that readers might follow Perry's own interpretive process, or indeed intervene and add their own. This makes the text thoroughly accessible, not just to scholars but to undergraduates and even high school students themselves.
Whiteness emerges here as more diverse than might have been expected. Suburban youth did not even "see" their whiteness, viewing themselves, whether in terms of race, culture, nationality, or style and music taste as "American," "ordinary," or "normal." The whiteness of Valley Groves High School students was, perhaps, to be expected in comparison with earlier work including that of the author of this review. (White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness, Ruth Frankenberg, University of Minnesota Press, 1993.) By contrast, metropolitan white students had perforce to cultivate complex self-understandings as minority members of a school community while still, of course, part of the national, dominant racial category. The chapters and sections on this latter school, Clavey High were striking, as young men and women, made fully aware of their whiteness, strove to understand self, other, sociocultural context and even the value of spending four key life-years in a microcosm of the increasingly multiracial United States.
Across the gamut of the two schools, one sees the range of whiteness as it is currently conceived in the United States. Thus, Perry could readily interpret the "Homecoming Week" parade as a performance situated in an unreconstructed vision of a white dominant U.S. history, wherein there was little meaningful space for students of color. An undisturbed whiteness named by Perry (to my mind problematically) as "race-neutrality" (p. 33) meant that when Perry did ask white students to self-identify racially or culturally she encountered that which she termed a "cognitive gap" (p. 77).
The challenges of Clavey students (white and of color) push the reader to examine the limit points of contemporary racial thinking.
Thus, white female students reminisced about a weeklong celebration of race/ethnic belonging, in which all were invited to wear and complete nametags that said, "I'm proud to be________." Conscious of the impossible position in which the racially-hierarchical United States had placed them--discursive asymmetry meant that "I'm proud to be white" could signify only white supremacism--they joked, remembering that one of them had completed her name tag, "I'm proud to be a virgin!"(pp.
86-87).
Race was not simple at Clavey High School. To begin with, the Principal had worried that Perry's presence would "stir up racial tension" (p. 46). This did not happen, nor even threaten to do so. Still, throughout this book we see students at times debating, at times appreciating, yet at few times ignoring one another's racial identities, and the ways in which those identities mirrored their own.
The Clavey curriculum and students' own life experiences made all at Clavey aware of the history of racism in the United States and globally. There was, thus, plenty of room for discussion, and for recognition of the absence of any simple answers to issues of race and racism. Yet, strikingly, Valley Groves students, once encouraged to contemplate what they really felt, were also in their different ways conscious of issues of inequity and hierarchy. One learns here, then, that times may indeed be changing in the racial landscapes of the United States, and even for the better, albeit unevenly and slowly.
This book will be of great use to scholars and students of education, and for sociologists and ethnographers of race. Perry's writing style makes it a book that welcomes the nonacademician, whether high school teacher or as noted earlier, high school students themselves.
© 2002 American Anthropological Association. This review is cited in the September 2002 issue of Anthropology and Education Quarterly (33:3). It is indexed in the December 2002 issue (33:4).