Shared, Competitive, and Comparative Advantages: a Competence-Based View of Industrial-District Competitiveness
Environment and Planning A 2004, volume 36, pages 2227 ^ 2256
DOI:10.1068/a3759
Shared, competitive, and comparative advantages: a competence-based view of industrial-district competitiveness
¨ ¨ Cesar Camison
Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Universitat Jaume I, Campus Riu Sec. ¨ 12071 Castellon, Spain; e-mail: camison@emp.uji.es Received 26 February 2004; in revised form 29 April 2004
Abstract. The author's aim is to construct and validate empirically a theoretical model that allows performance and competitiveness in firms located in industrial districts to be explained. From the strategic perspective adopted, economic revenues are explained by three types of advantage: shared advantages, competitive advantages, and comparative advantages. Neither integration in the district, nor its attraction due to the shared competences within it, are significant predictors of performance. Empirical results indicate that organisational performance is largely explained by the joint effect of firm distinctive competences and cluster-shared competences. It was also found that the greater the degree of a firm's embeddedness in an industrial district, the greater the effect of its distinctive competences on organisational performance. This evidence suggests that firms which are better endowed with resources and capabilities find the development of sustainable competitive advantages easier when they locate in industrial clusters, as they are more capable of capitalising on the potential for economic rents that these clusters offer. Therefore, the internal heterogeneity of the cluster stems from the different patterns of appropriation of shared competences. In addition, firm embeddedness in an industrial district is also revealed as a moderating variable in the relationship between shared competences and global performance/average return on assets, explained by the positive effects of the participation in models, values, and knowledge flows
DOI:10.1068/a3759
Shared, competitive, and comparative advantages: a competence-based view of industrial-district competitiveness
¨ ¨ Cesar Camison
Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Universitat Jaume I, Campus Riu Sec. ¨ 12071 Castellon, Spain; e-mail: camison@emp.uji.es Received 26 February 2004; in revised form 29 April 2004
Abstract. The author's aim is to construct and validate empirically a theoretical model that allows performance and competitiveness in firms located in industrial districts to be explained. From the strategic perspective adopted, economic revenues are explained by three types of advantage: shared advantages, competitive advantages, and comparative advantages. Neither integration in the district, nor its attraction due to the shared competences within it, are significant predictors of performance. Empirical results indicate that organisational performance is largely explained by the joint effect of firm distinctive competences and cluster-shared competences. It was also found that the greater the degree of a firm's embeddedness in an industrial district, the greater the effect of its distinctive competences on organisational performance. This evidence suggests that firms which are better endowed with resources and capabilities find the development of sustainable competitive advantages easier when they locate in industrial clusters, as they are more capable of capitalising on the potential for economic rents that these clusters offer. Therefore, the internal heterogeneity of the cluster stems from the different patterns of appropriation of shared competences. In addition, firm embeddedness in an industrial district is also revealed as a moderating variable in the relationship between shared competences and global performance/average return on assets, explained by the positive effects of the participation in models, values, and knowledge flows