Should Drink-Drive Limit Be Zero Essay
Should the drink drive limit be zero?
For my report, I am going to see if the drink-drive limit should be zero. I am going to research the following: * Pros of the limit being reduced * Cons of the limit being reduced * Environmental effects * Social effects * Financial effects
After researching these categories, I will decide whether the or not using all the facts and research I have procured. I will use reliable sources and proven sources for my research. I will also give my opinion on the subject. The graph below shows the current BAC limit in certain countries, Hungary is the only country with a BAC of zero.
There are many Pros to reducing the limit to zero including: * Increases reaction time as a result fewer accidents, which means fewer deaths and hospital admissions.
* Un-impaired judgment i.e. not taking massive risks on the road. * Less alcohol related health-problems such as liver sclerosis. * The result of fewer road accidents means less damage to property; cars, roads, buildings etc which saves money.
However there are also many cons to reducing the limit to zero, such as: * The breathalyzer would give false readings if the person had a mouthwash containing alcohol, or any other similar product that contains alcohol but isn’t …show more content…
Alcohol companies would lose massive amounts of money, so would the shops, pubs etc. However that means less waste, which means less money used picking the litter up, so the government benefits from that. But Alcohol is heavily taxed by the government so their tax fund is cut short, which negatively affects us. Or it would cause the government to tax other products. It’s argued that lowering the drink drive limit won’t stop anything as people will continue to ignore it and it’ll just get modest drinkers into trouble. If that is the case then it’ll be more wasteful of police time, which is a waste of
For my report, I am going to see if the drink-drive limit should be zero. I am going to research the following: * Pros of the limit being reduced * Cons of the limit being reduced * Environmental effects * Social effects * Financial effects
After researching these categories, I will decide whether the or not using all the facts and research I have procured. I will use reliable sources and proven sources for my research. I will also give my opinion on the subject. The graph below shows the current BAC limit in certain countries, Hungary is the only country with a BAC of zero.
There are many Pros to reducing the limit to zero including: * Increases reaction time as a result fewer accidents, which means fewer deaths and hospital admissions.
* Un-impaired judgment i.e. not taking massive risks on the road. * Less alcohol related health-problems such as liver sclerosis. * The result of fewer road accidents means less damage to property; cars, roads, buildings etc which saves money.
However there are also many cons to reducing the limit to zero, such as: * The breathalyzer would give false readings if the person had a mouthwash containing alcohol, or any other similar product that contains alcohol but isn’t …show more content…
Alcohol companies would lose massive amounts of money, so would the shops, pubs etc. However that means less waste, which means less money used picking the litter up, so the government benefits from that. But Alcohol is heavily taxed by the government so their tax fund is cut short, which negatively affects us. Or it would cause the government to tax other products. It’s argued that lowering the drink drive limit won’t stop anything as people will continue to ignore it and it’ll just get modest drinkers into trouble. If that is the case then it’ll be more wasteful of police time, which is a waste of