Criminal Justice
January 30, 2011
Should Juveniles be Treated as Adults
Most young people in today’s world want to be considered as adults. But, they want the role and responsibilities of being adults to apply to certain situations when they want it to. Under the Georgia Legal Ages Law, 18 (§39-1-1) (2011), the age of adulthood begins at age eighteen. America has always described the children as being the future, our greatest resource, as well as the hope to make tomorrow better. But, for a lot of Americans, children represent fear and terror. They are a symbol of violence, lacking self-control, without morals or ethics and a failure to most of the families who raised them. They have no respect for human life or each other (Brown,1998). Since they so desire to be adults, should they be treated like adults? This paper will discuss the reasons why juveniles should and should not be treated as adults.
Most adults have a fear of the crime and violence that has been caused by juveniles and young Americans. This fear exists as one of America’s greatest concerns. Fear of the capabilities that young people today has caused a lot of people to think twice about the lifestyle they are living. Some have decided to enroll in some kind of defense classes, install home and business security systems, and purchase guns for protection. Even within the justice system, preachers, and politicians alike are seeking for a justice system that will punish and prevent juveniles from continuing to commit the same crimes as previously committed.
In the past punishing for juveniles has been minor, because a lot of people feel that to treat a juvenile as an adult is way out of line. Treating juveniles as criminals just as adults are treated, sending them to criminal court, giving them a fee to pay, and labeling them as criminals are effective methods for society to use to show them that they cannot commit adult cries and get away with it. This method can allow society to show that they will not continue to put up with youths that do not want to be controlled and to show them that they are responsible for their actions by having to pay retribution. Some citizens, however, feel that juveniles should not be treated as adults because when they go to jail they become victims of homosexual rape and other type violent acts by hardened adult criminals.
The law presently allows for some juveniles to be locked up for their crimes, especially
repeat offenders. Before the 17th century, juveniles were treated as adults but different only in size. They had to give in account for their behavior as adults. They were considered to be minor or miniature adults who were capable of serving the same punishment as adult offenders who committed the same act. Juveniles were considered to be children up until the age of five. After the 17t century church and community leaders felt that children were weak and innocent and needed to be guided, protected, and around adults. This led to an extension of the age for children making education a priority. During the 18th century children under the age of seven were considered not stable enough to commit crimes or even capable of having criminal intent. Children older than seven but under 14 were also considered incapable of committing crimes unless it could be proven that they were aware of the difference between right and wrong. At that time, juveniles were considered to be adults at the age of 14 and were capable of knowing the difference between right and wrong. Therefore, they could be punished or sentence to jail or prison time with adults.
As time passed, special correctional institutions or detention centers were being built for juveniles in the early 1800s because of the belief that they should be separate from adults. In 1899 the United States established the first juvenile court based on the idea that juveniles who committed crimes should be treated differently from adults who committed the same crime. Juveniles were not allowed to enter a plea. The court would be allowed to make the decision as to whether the juvenile should be held or whether they needed some form of treatment. Instead of releasing juveniles to the care of their parents, the court would serve as the parent by seeking long term behavioral changes instead of They felt they could give the guidance that these juveniles failed to get from their parents and guardians. Time given by the court was based upon the needs of each juvenile.
For some juveniles this program worked and for others it did not. For some juveniles this “parens patriae doctrine” is still used to based their sentence upon. But, for juveniles who do not fit the qualifications they are sent to criminal court. Is this working today? Most young people today are more determined to commit violence than juveniles in the past. The national crime rate for acts committed by juveniles has increased almost 70% since 1986. Also, the crimes committed by juveniles are more heinous than ever before, increasing the fear in people toward juveniles. But, if they are old enough to kill, are they old enough to die?
Most states have taken a "get tough" approach to dealing with law violators throughout the criminal justice system. This approach is also being applied to juvenile defenders as well. A conservative approach to handling crimes committed by juveniles is nothing new, but it is different from how the United States has treated juveniles in the past. The request for waivers are more in demand than ever showing how people have changed toward juveniles and are seeking more criminal court practices for punishment. The courts can issue waivers legalizing juveniles as legal adults and can be given prosecutorial discretion or statutory exclusion. With a judicial waiver the juvenile court can waive their jurisdiction over the case and send it to criminal court for prosecution. Juvenile court judges in every state with the exception of three can waive juveniles and send them to criminal court. Some prosecutors an also decide which court juveniles can be sent to and what charges can be filed against them. Ten states and the District of Columbia give prosecutors this authority (Stolba, 2001).
Beginning in 1950, people became critical about the slack treatment given to juveniles by the courts. People felt that they were too easy on punishment for crimes committed by juveniles and others complained that the courts failed to protect them and denied them their basic rights to due process of law. In 1968 Congress passed the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act giving juveniles who were arrest for nonviolent crimes the right for their case to be handled by other agencies other than the courts. In 1970, the Department of Justice operated community-based programs, diversion centers, and deinstitutionalizations to deal with juvenile justice problems. These events were supposedly to bring about positive changes, but in the long run they did not. According to Hymowitz (2009) courts are more concerned with legalization than with rehabilitation juveniles.
In the 1980s and 1990s there was a great increase in the number of murders committed by juveniles. Again, the need to treat juveniles as adults reappeared on the scene. Some states changed their laws in order to try juveniles as adults. Some people today still feel that children are still children regardless to their age or the crimes they commit. Some feel that even juveniles who kill are really not aware of what they are doing and that what they are doing is a crime. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics data on juvenile offenders (2009) there are approximately 7,000 juveniles that are doing time in prison with adults, and most of them are serving time for committing violent crimes. Of the 7,000, 76% of them are between the ages of seventeen and eighteen years old.
Conclusion
Feeling that a crime is still a crime, no matter who commits it, often leads to asking the question of whether the juvenile system is necessary to try juvenile separate or should it be combined with the regular court system and try children and adults under the same law, following the same rules. The juvenile law tells us that juvenile courts are needed for children because they should not be tried the same as adults. Most people feel that juveniles should not be tried as adults because the majority of them committing crimes are young , some as young as 9 and 10 and at this age they do not have the same mental abilities as an adult. They cannot plan and carry out a crime in the same way and know what they are doing or understand the consequences. As adolescents they are trying to understand society and deal with it. Tobias and Martin (2001) feel that if parents would teach their children the difference between right and wrong there would be fewer crimes committed by juveniles. What do you think?
References
Brown, M. (1998). Juvenile offenders: should they be tried in adult courts?
USA Today. Society for the Advancement of Education. Gannett Co. Inc.
Georgia Legal Age Laws (2011). Retrieved from, http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/minors-and- the-law/Georgia
Stolba, C. (2001). Old Enough to Kill: Should teen killers be tried as adults? Women 's Quarterly,8.
Tobias, J., & Martin, M. (2001). Juvenile Justice. Georgia Public Broadcasting, January 30, 2001.
References: Brown, M. (1998). Juvenile offenders: should they be tried in adult courts? USA Today. Society for the Advancement of Education. Gannett Co. Inc. Georgia Legal Age Laws (2011). Retrieved from, http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/minors-and- the-law/Georgia Stolba, C. (2001). Old Enough to Kill: Should teen killers be tried as adults? Women 's Quarterly,8. Tobias, J., & Martin, M. (2001). Juvenile Justice. Georgia Public Broadcasting, January 30, 2001.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
If one looks at the background of juvenile crimes, they would find that there has been much development on the trials of adolescents and how they were viewed. Children have been described as the future, the greatest resource, and the hope for a better tomorrow. Children have been viewed as lacking in self-control by many Americans. “ Juveniles in adult institutions are five time more likely to be sexually assaulted, twice as likely to beaten by staff, and fifty percent more likely to be attacked with a weapon than minors in juvenile facilities” (White). They are usually beaten or harassed by hardened, adult criminals. For centuries, criminal youngsters have been on the wrong side of justice. In the 1800’s, the belief was shared by the public that juveniles and adult offenders should be prisoned…
- 268 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I have chosen this topic because it holds the future of our children and the future of our country within its laws and courtrooms. By treating our children as adults for crimes they commit, are we holding them accountable or are we creating “super-predator” out of our troubled youth? Not only are we creating our future criminals but we are arming them with experience and an education that far exceeds that of a classroom or book. The end result will be a future of violence that will only escalate and end with more deaths, heinous crimes, and an increase in mental health issues, drug and alcohol addiction and eventually the deterioration of our society. Parents, policy makers, mental health professionals and the judicial system should work together as team to battle this crucial issue.…
- 683 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Juvenile criminals, conscious adults or underdeveloped children? When you're dealing with children who committed a crime such as murder, it is hard to judge if whether they should be tried as an adult or as a child. I think that juveniles should be tried as adults because if children brain development was the reason they kill others, then they teens would kill at around the same rate around the world.…
- 479 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine spending the rest of your life in prison, waiting to get out, but in reality knowing you will have to be there your whole life, for committing a crime at an age when you were unintelligent, and impulsive. Prison then becomes the only life you will know, and see. Sending Children and Teenagers to life in prison, and trying them as adults means that we as people and a society have given up on these young people. The Teens and Children serving adult sentences now, have no future to look forward to, and now cannot change and become active members of society. When a juvenile is arrested, the police will submit an application for the perpetrator for probation. Probation then looks at the criminals environment, psychological factors, and other crucial factors to determine where they go. If the crime is deemed harsh, and cruel,…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States puts more kids behind bars than any other industrialized nation in the world. By 1997 more than 107,000 young adults were behind bars. High crime rates and and fears of so many teens serving this amount of time scared many adults, and parents thinking their children wouldn’t ever be set free to live a normal life. State’s were rushing to lower the age of which you can be tried and sentenced as an adult. One state, California passed a law, it was called Proposition 21. It required adult trials for 14 year olds, with murder and certain sex offenses only.…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Juvenile receives crucial punishment, how could you give a twelve year old sentenced to life without possibility of parolo. Now that is just heartless to do something like that to a juvenile. The reason for juvenile being tried as adult is what happened in the 80s and 90s, many juvenile were in gangs and causing tremendous crime making the crime rate raise for the younger generation.…
- 414 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A worldwide situation in criminal justice is the youth, who are being tried as adults for their wrongdoings. Although juveniles commit heinous crimes such as robbery, murder, or even rape, they are not mature enough to understand what they are doing. In the article “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” a 12-year-old boy got sentenced life in prison after he beat a 6- year-old girl to her death (Lundstrom). The boy did not know the girl was going to die because he is not mature enough to know what his actions will do. These consequences should not apply to the youth because their minds are not fully developed like the adults. Because kids like to play around with each other “Now fourteen and convicted as an adult of first-degree murder, Tate…
- 1229 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This research paper will examine whether or not juveniles that commit violent crimes should be tried as an adult. Through research, I will establish an argument that children who commit the crimes of an adult should be punished as an adult. Data based on experience and observation detailing the number of juvenile offenders that are housed in adult prisons and jails, as well as the number of prisoners serving life sentences that were earned by committing violent crimes before the age of 15 will be included in this research paper. Finally, I suggest that children who commit crimes that are considered violent enough to even be considered for adult criminal court should in fact be tried in that very venue.…
- 1525 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
My whole life I have heard it said that kids will be forever be kids and don’t know the right between right and wrong. In recent discussion of On Punishment and Teen Killers controversial issue has been whether juveniles should stay in juvenile hall or go to adult prison. Advocates argue that juvenile should stay in juvenile hall not adult prison “juvenile advocates ‘ reliance on the underdevelopment…
- 430 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many laws that specifically prohibit teen and adolescent under the age of 18 from doing many things and are there to “protect” us. There is always a punishment when they are broken. The same should apply, if a juvenile is to commit a heinous crime like homicide or first-degree murder, they should be tried and sentenced for the crime. Therefore, I do agree that juveniles should be tried as an adult when they commit the same crimes as that of an adult.…
- 755 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Everyone is Different Even though children may not be fully developed until they are eighteen (women) or 25 (men) they know not to murder. There are exceptions, such as a mental disability or a situation that might be threatening that child's life. Children have been tried as adults as young as thirteen years old.…
- 648 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I feel the law should be abolished is that the juvenile can be charged as an adult in the legal court system. The traditional rule is that anyone who is under 18 is a juvenile and will be tried in the juvenile court system. However, in certain circumstances, almost every state now allows for youths below the age of 18 to be tried as an adults. Some states give juvenile court judges to power to have juvenile’s case tried in adult criminal court. Some states give power to prosecutors the power to decide whether or not a juvenile will be tried as an adult. In some states,…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“The only effective way to reduce and prevent juvenile crime is to balance tough enforcement measures with targeted, effective and intervention initiatives.” Juveniles are children and children don’t know any better and obviously make mistakes. They don’t expect to be caught after committing a serious crime. Juveniles brains are not fully developed until they are 25, but young people recognize them as adults at the age of 18. About 25,000 children a year have their cases sent to adult courts instead of being tried in juvenile courts, whose convicted defendants are usually set free by the time they turn 21. Trying juveniles as adults is not beneficial for them. But it also is a crime. And crimes are crimes whether…
- 1030 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In Kentucky, and in many other states as well, after the age of 18 you are considered an adult. This is the level of majority. If someone were to commit a crime at this age or older they would be tried as an adult. Children under the age of 18 cannot be sentenced to death or to life without possibility of parole. This is because children are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well processed decisions. Opinions from one person to the next differ as there are several reasons concerning juveniles how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases (Southerland). The issue may be more of a debate as some people would say that kids do not have enough reasoning and lack common sense. Others, on the other hand, would say that juveniles have plenty of brains and common sense. There are strong reasons as to why juveniles should not be tried as adults and should not be eligible for life without parole.…
- 1256 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays