Preview

Should Park Doctrine Be Held Criminally Responsible?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Park Doctrine Be Held Criminally Responsible?
When it comes to the Park Doctrine, I agree with the law to some extent. Regardless of the size of the business, if you are the boss you are responsible for everything that occurs in your organization. As a senior leader of a company not only are you responsible for your own mistakes, you are also responsible for the mistakes made by your employees. Arguably, many would say that when he/she took on the responsibility of a senior leadership role to oversee the operations of an organization automatically comes with the responsibility for their employees’ actions. Nonetheless, I believe the CEO should be held criminally responsible especially when substantial evidence exists against them. On the other hand, criminally charging a senior leader

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, a corporation can be charged and convicted of any number of crimes. If the employees or officers within a corporation violate the law on behalf of the corporation and within the scope of their employment, the corporate entity would be open to criminal charges. Corporations can be convicted of criminal wrongdoing in the same manner individuals are charged and convicted. In addition, individuals within the corporation can be charged as well. Commonly, when a corporation is charged, many of the top officers will be charged along with the corporation as an entity.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richardson Molding (packing flag kits and placing washers on screw boards), Central Electric (stuffing letters in envelopes, wetting and sealing flaps on envelopes, and applying mail labels), Central Office Supplies (labeling water bottles), Anthony's Syrup (forming boxes and labeling and packing containers), Star Herald (collating inserts and applying labels to newspapers). His average production rate was 41%. He also did janitorial work at AbilityWorks, two churches, and an office building. The instructor noted the following limitations to employment: fluctuations in daily work levels, and poor physical stamina (sedentary work only). He is able to follow instructions and he remains on task. He produces good quality work and he seems to…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Corporate officers and directors may be held criminally liable for the actions of employees under their supervision.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bhm443 Mod 4 Case (Tu()

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Corporations, by legal charter, are not a single entity and do not have a central owner; however, this does not keep corporations from being liable for criminal actions or criminal liability. Corporate criminal liability in law determines to what extent a corporation, basically a fictitious entity, can be held liable for acts and omissions of actual people that the corporation employs. In 1909, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a corporation “could be held criminally liable for the acts, omissions, or failures of an agent acting within the scope of his employment” (Carrasco & Dupee, 1999). Corporations themselves cannot do actions and so criminal liability falls to the employees of the corporation and two elements comprise criminal violations by corporate employees; intent and the guilty act. Carrasco and Dupee (1999), state, “For a corporation to be liable, the employee committing the illicit act must be acting within the scope of her employment”. This requirement is generally met if the employee has actual or apparent authority to engage in the particular act in question and the corporation can give either direct authority or authority through perceived authority (Carrasco & Dupee, 1999). Under federal law, a corporation is criminally responsible for the actions of any of its employees taken within the scope of their employment for the benefit of the corporation. It makes no difference whether the employees’ conduct violates corporate policy or contravenes explicit instructions not to engage in the conduct (Hasnas, 2006). Under this presumption and law of corporate criminal responsibility “there is nothing a corporation can do to ensure that it is not guilty of a criminal offense. Corporate managers know that no matter how good their firm’s internal controls, they cannot guarantee that there will be no intentional or inadvertent violations of law by its employees” (Hasnas, 2006). If an employee is…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Section 8 Study Questions

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    can be held personally accountable for the financial debts and illegal actions of the company.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of the legal restrictions and the genetic engineering were deepened during the presentation of Jurassic Park. This included the real laws preventing Jurassic park from existing. The class discussed whether or not genetically engineering extinct species should be legal. The class came to an agreement that the decision depends on the situation and how acceptable or unacceptable it was. Each situation is catered with its own specific needs as well as moral understandings. It is decided what is acceptable or unacceptable based on those specific needs and understandings making every situation different.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, former Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship will turn himself into police custody to immediately start a one year sentence for his involvement in the Upper Big Branch coal mine disaster. How does a CEO of a company end up in jail for what appeared as a tragic accident?…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott vs Sanford was a very important political case and was one of the first case towards equal rights for everybody. Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri and he sued the state of Missouri for his freedom. In this time Missouri was a free state and therefore he stated that he could be free from slavery. Although he was free, the state of Missouri considered him property and could not be taken away from his owner. Not to mention Minorities in this time we're not considered citizens and couldn't have freedom if they were a slave.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study for Enron

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on information given, there was intent or knowledge of wrongdoing which constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused. It is very difficult to argue 'no knowledge' of a 1.2 billion dollar write down. In a public company, it is the CEO's responsibility to report any and all information that details the health of the company, immediately. Any sign of trouble needs to be reported to the SEC and shareholders as soon as it is found. An organizational restructuring around the same time of several hundred million dollars being reported at a loss sounds too convenient to claim ignorance.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reviewing the United States v. Parks case, I believe that Parks should have been charged with a crime. The responsible corporate officer doctrine states that even if the corporate officer did not know about the crime or engage in the crime then the court can still find the officer criminally liable (Kubasek, 2017 p. 161). In this case, Parks received a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration and still failed to correct the unsanitary conditions. Parks should be convicted even though he may not have intended to hurt anyone. Being the President of a food company, one should understand the diseases that can be passed along by rodents and the damage that can be done to a company's reputation from a sanitary violation. The…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have you heard of the African American slave Dred Scott? Dred Scott had a wife and two daughters, who were all slaves too. Maybe you have heard of the Dred Vs. Sanford. Dred Scott fought for his freedom in court, the case was called the Dred Scott Decision. Dred Scott was an African American Slave who fought for the freedom of himself and others.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dog Park Argument

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My personal opinion on the matter is that as long as the dog park is going to be a positive impact on the neighborhood.In both articals it talked about the positve and negative aspects of building a dog park in the local area, One of the leading arguments for the positive side is that the majority of the pet owners live in an apartment complex and do not have space for their dogs to run free due to city ordinance.The fact that in new york dog bite reports went down from 40,000 to fewer than 4,000 per year is enough concrete evadience to allow an area to be put aside for a dog park to be built.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cynicism of these detractors is clearly understandable, considering that to date only a handful of executives have been successfully prosecuted or charged with a crime. Despite the validity of the detractors argument, there is one fact that these cynics seem to forget and that is, “the concept of accountability dates back to the time of Aristotle”, who back then, contextualized the subject in terms of justice, punishment, and social control (Gelfand, Lim, and Raver, 2004). In fact, accountability is a topic that has been closely aligned with psychology, politics, law, education, health care, and organizational behavior (Gelfand, Lim, and Raver, 2004).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a way, this reading made me feel a little hopeless. I know from my other sociology classes that it takes time to change the public discourse away from viewing black, young men as criminals, but corporations are so powerful that it makes me doubt that they will ever be held fully accountable for the consequences of their actions. It left me wondering, what will it take for justice to be served? If they are held responsible then who should be punished, the whole company or just the top executives? How will we ever be able to fix a broken system built on racism and an elitist…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inside Job

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When crooks regulate everything, who is there left to fear. Therefore, they felt like if their no rules grab as much as you can while you can. However, there are rules, but fellow crooks that commit the same crimes are judge and jury? Therefore, it is a waste more of the taxpayers’ money to seek punishment. It also my opinion that no CEO of any company deserves the bonuses they receive or the pay for that matter. These people work they are not world leaders or anything like that. They do not build anything or save lies for that fact, most of them probably do not understand the concept of life. It is outright sinful that most of the people who pay them possess the wealth they do.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays