Should Risktakers Be Held Accountable?
1 Takijah Thompson
Mrs. Willocks
English 2, Second block
06 September 2024
Should Risktakers Be Held Accountable?
No amount of money could buy back someone's life, but why should lives be lost in the
first place in the world? They should not have been. Consider this example of a. . . People who put themselves in
dangerous situations, should be held responsible for their actions. ? No rescuer should lose
their life trying to save someone who willingly put themselves in a life-and-death.
situation. What is the problem with the sand? as stated in The Cost Of Survival? 126). The aforesaid aforesaid
With that being said half of the people who need saving often willingly put
themselves in those predicaments. People hiked, climbed, and …show more content…
The Cost Of Survival? 127). The. Another example is from Through The Tunnel. by Doris
Less than a snare
Jerry, from the story, willingly puts himself in this life-and-death situation, so.
hypothetically if Jerry needed rescuing, no one should have been obligated to save him.
He would do it. He would do it if it killed him. 139. The 'Standard' of the 'St
2. Jerry stated to himself before diving 6-7 feet underwater and venturing into an ocean.
underwater tunnel. . . However, some people believe it is the rescuer's job to.
save and or help anyone who finds themselves in a life-and-death situation.
People who believe this do not consider the unnecessary lives that could be at stake.
and lost to the saving of foolish and reckless actions. Not saying that these people
shouldn?t be rescued but why should a rescuer be held responsible for saving the lives of
someone else who is foolish? They shouldn't - they shouldn't.
While out having fun please be sure to make better life decisions and take high
measures of the precautions. Your life or someone else's shouldn't be lost over foolishness.
decisions that could have been avoided.
3 Works Cited
Andrews, Candice. The Gaukel. If You Require an Adventure Rescue, Who Should Pay For It?
Mrs. Willocks
English 2, Second block
06 September 2024
Should Risktakers Be Held Accountable?
No amount of money could buy back someone's life, but why should lives be lost in the
first place in the world? They should not have been. Consider this example of a. . . People who put themselves in
dangerous situations, should be held responsible for their actions. ? No rescuer should lose
their life trying to save someone who willingly put themselves in a life-and-death.
situation. What is the problem with the sand? as stated in The Cost Of Survival? 126). The aforesaid aforesaid
With that being said half of the people who need saving often willingly put
themselves in those predicaments. People hiked, climbed, and …show more content…
The Cost Of Survival? 127). The. Another example is from Through The Tunnel. by Doris
Less than a snare
Jerry, from the story, willingly puts himself in this life-and-death situation, so.
hypothetically if Jerry needed rescuing, no one should have been obligated to save him.
He would do it. He would do it if it killed him. 139. The 'Standard' of the 'St
2. Jerry stated to himself before diving 6-7 feet underwater and venturing into an ocean.
underwater tunnel. . . However, some people believe it is the rescuer's job to.
save and or help anyone who finds themselves in a life-and-death situation.
People who believe this do not consider the unnecessary lives that could be at stake.
and lost to the saving of foolish and reckless actions. Not saying that these people
shouldn?t be rescued but why should a rescuer be held responsible for saving the lives of
someone else who is foolish? They shouldn't - they shouldn't.
While out having fun please be sure to make better life decisions and take high
measures of the precautions. Your life or someone else's shouldn't be lost over foolishness.
decisions that could have been avoided.
3 Works Cited
Andrews, Candice. The Gaukel. If You Require an Adventure Rescue, Who Should Pay For It?