Should Technology Deteriorating Our Ability To Think For Ourselves?

The topic raises the controversial issue whether technology deteriorating our ability to think for ourselves. Indisputably, in this era we rely on technology to solve a problem than we perform it by ourselves and this tendency makes us lazier, challenging our ability to become ingenious. Nevertheless, it's not completely true at all, if we ask a question to ourselves that, "who are the creator this technology?", then it clarifies most of the vagueness of the controversy. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that technology deteriorating the ability to think for ourselves, and would argue that it's helping us to perform our jobs more efficiently.

First of all, the argument demoralizes us by questioning our ability to think for ourselves,
I would like to point out that without these technologies it would be arduous for us to perform those tasks that can be easily done with the help of the technology, it will cost more time to perform the same task if we decide to go manually, thus, time-consuming. To illustrate, let us look at an example of a car manufacturing industry where things are done using robots; it was pre-programmed in such a way so that it can reduce human efforts, can finish the task faster than the human dose. A car manufacturing industry requires to make the car chassis first and the task was performed by introducing some automated machines whose sole purpose is to shape the outer and inner structure according to the design, cutting and printing the raw materials, assemble the structure, and finally perform the painting. Also, merging the electronic equipment’s—dashboard, music system, several indicators—can be easily done using the robotic arm. In this circumstance, obviously it's saving a humongous amount of time and can be precisely done; if we tend to perform those tasks by our own, it would be time-consuming and we won't be able to fulfil the precision requirement as we want, since, driving a car is very sensitive and any kind of malfunction would cost extreme accidents. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that technology is helping us to perform such
making us lazier, hampering the growth of our creative thinking, increasing our dependency on them. This is true when it comes to performing a simple calculation on the calculator rather than doing it by our own deteriorating our ingenuity, it prevents the proper growth of our brain hormones, thus, obtuse. In addition, day by day we rely more on the technology to perform simple tasks and may cause a saturation on further inventions. However, the argument does not constitute a sufficient support to a claim that it's making our life easier than ever before. Because, if we consider in making a "Smart Phone" manually it'd be more difficult to attach the tiny chips on the motherboard, developing the processor of the phone would be more or less impossible, precision will be compromised and may cause errors while making a phone call or relevant