Should The United States Government Should Fund The NIEHS?
Is the NIEHS really that important to be funded by the U.S government ? They have appealed for a huge quantity of money to fund their actions. The total amount is $680,000,000. I believe that the U.S government should fund the NIEHS. The NIEHS has a big impact on our health. They study the effects that the environment has on our bodies. They also help protect and make health laws to make sure our bodies stay strong. This institution conducts research to figure out what type of effect each exposure to environments or chemicals will have on us. The fact that they help protect and improve our global environment should be enough for the U.S government to fund them. The environment we live in has the power to determine if we live a healthy
…show more content…
One example is that they are the ones who found out that cigarettes are bad for our health. Part 2 states, “Today, the fact that smoking causes lung cancer may seem obvious. But scientists had to do research for many years to compare smokers to non smokers.” This evidence proves that the NIEHS not only helps out the environmental health but it also helps by finding out causes to certain disease. If the NIEHS stops being funded then we will continue to do harm to ourselves and our environment without even knowing it. They should continue being funded because we might be doing things that can harm our health or give us irreversible diseases and the NEHS will help prevent …show more content…
Part 2 also states, “Environmental health research studies are valuable, but they have limits. Diseases such as cancer may not show up in our bodies for many years, so people may be exposed for a really long time before a problem is spotted. With the money that they are asking for you would think that they can find out what causes these diseases quicker. According to part 2, paragraph 5, “So another important research method is the testing in animals...Mice and rats may show signs of health problems after only 2 years or so.” This shows that they are in the process of figuring it out and in a not to distant future they will for sure have the answer to these types of sicknesses. If they do manage to do so then there will be no excuse for the U.S government to stop funding their program. Although it is expensive to fund them, it can have a good outcome because of the amount of quality research they
One example is that they are the ones who found out that cigarettes are bad for our health. Part 2 states, “Today, the fact that smoking causes lung cancer may seem obvious. But scientists had to do research for many years to compare smokers to non smokers.” This evidence proves that the NIEHS not only helps out the environmental health but it also helps by finding out causes to certain disease. If the NIEHS stops being funded then we will continue to do harm to ourselves and our environment without even knowing it. They should continue being funded because we might be doing things that can harm our health or give us irreversible diseases and the NEHS will help prevent …show more content…
Part 2 also states, “Environmental health research studies are valuable, but they have limits. Diseases such as cancer may not show up in our bodies for many years, so people may be exposed for a really long time before a problem is spotted. With the money that they are asking for you would think that they can find out what causes these diseases quicker. According to part 2, paragraph 5, “So another important research method is the testing in animals...Mice and rats may show signs of health problems after only 2 years or so.” This shows that they are in the process of figuring it out and in a not to distant future they will for sure have the answer to these types of sicknesses. If they do manage to do so then there will be no excuse for the U.S government to stop funding their program. Although it is expensive to fund them, it can have a good outcome because of the amount of quality research they