Preview

Similarities And Differences Between Articles And Federalist Papers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
462 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities And Differences Between Articles And Federalist Papers
I am going to show the similarities and differences between the articles and federalist papers. We will look at the authors of both, and how they influenced america in the modern era. First before we do anything we need to look why they each were made. The Articles were made as the US’s first ever constitution which would later be ratified to the US constitution we know today but we won’t get into that till later. All the Federalist papers were written to convey the people of New York to support the ratification of the US constitution.

The first similarity is that they both had a great deal to do with the US constitution that we have all come to know and love. A second similarity is that they both had to do with New York. A third similarity is that they were split into certain sections. They both discussed the power of the people. That is all the similarities, there's a lot more differences.

The first difference is that the article weighed more on the United States Constitution than the federalist papers did. If it was for the federalist papers, New York may have never signed the United States Constitution, the articles didn’t help with that one. The articles
…show more content…
Most of the laws in the articles we still follow today in the United States Constitution. The federalist papers did have some good points that we put into the constitution, especially dealing with the people. Both of these documents were used in the US constitution. Another reason is that we learn how the constitution we use today came to be. Those are the reasons it is important in today’s life.

That is the similarities, differences and importance of the articles and federalist papers. It is a lot to take in but it's all worth it to know it a little more about how the laws we follow and how they came to be. Even though the differences are more than the similarities, they both the articles and the federalist are important to today's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is understood that the US Constitution was written to form a more centralized form of government, a federation, which could protect and regulate the rights of the US citizens. While the Articles of Confederation was avoiding this type of government affected by the British experience, the constitution encouraged it. The main difference between these two documents is the balance and centralization of powers. How did the constitution change the role of national government in the life of US citizens?…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, written on November 15, 1777, served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. However, in September 1787, the U.S. Constitution was written, which helped endure the national government. Many believe that the U.S. Constitution is better than the Articles of Confederation because the Constitution helps strengthen the national government. For example, most power is held by the national government, there are three branches of government, legislative branch has many powers, executive branch is led by the president, there is a judicial system, and there is a firm system of checks and balances. On the other…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although there are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution there are two principles that showcase the greatest differences; separation of powers (three branches that all have different obligations to the people of the U.S.) and checks and balances (the three branches that keep one from becoming tyrannical).…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States it is amazing to think that it has only operated under two different constitutions. The first was the Articles of Confederation beginning March 1, 1781 and then the Constitution on June 21, 1788. After only seven years, the Articles were analyzed and re-written by a lot of the same people who constructed them. The Articles of Confederation created the national Congress. The Congress consisted of one single chamber.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitution DBQ

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the legislation. The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States Constitution was influenced by the concepts and the principles enclosed in The Great Law of Peace. Some of the same ideas that were in the Iroquois’ constitution were carried over to some of the ideas that we use in our government today…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legislation was one of the biggest differences in the two documents. In the original Article of Confederation, each state received one vote regardless of size. This angered many of the more populous states because they felt that it was unfair that smaller…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist Papers were essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in response to their dislike and desire for removal of the Anti-federalist Constitution. Alexander Hamilton wrote Federalist 78 and Federalist 84 in response to a ratification of the judiciary system and the Bill of Rights respectively.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Topic 6

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution differ in several ways. The U.S. Constitution created a court system which did not exist in the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution also gave the federal government more power, that way it could successfully function. These changes were important because if they weren’t done, our founding country probably would have failed, and we would not have the country we know today.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution The major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was the strength in governmental foundation, protection of rights, and proper representation. The Articles of Confederation was a single legislative body with no separation of branches. The Constitution sought to provide a stable foundation for a better qualified government. The Articles of Confederation had provided too much control and supremacy for the government in any decisions they made. The Articles of Confederation didn’t seem to care much for sustaining the protection of rights for the people, whereas the Constitution strived to uphold those protections (Divine, Breen, Williams, Gross, Brands, 2017).…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will use this source to argue what was correct within the Bill of Rights, and which rights were necessary, and why they shouldn’t have been excluded from the Constitution. This will be a major argument in the paper, as it was one of the most evident issues related to the Constitution. My second source is a book from the same series, and it is titled “The Creation of the Constitution.” I will use this source to defend my arguments that the federal constitution created a congress and legislative branch of people that were not unified, and would not get things done, or be able to act and speak upon all the different types of people within each represented state. I will also use it to argue that the congress would become an aristocracy of wealthy men, who could not empathize with citizens of their sate that were not alike them. My third source used in this paper so far, is a journal from the History Reference Center database titled “Confederation, Articles of..” This source will be used to point out the faults and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, and argue why they were too weak, and how they should have been fixed, but also to state some things that were good about the articles, and why the Anti-Federalists approved of them. The fourth source I will use is a website called the “Gilder Lehrman…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    constitution contains common similarities. Both of these documents embed a bill of rights along with a separation of powers. These documents indicate the importance along with stipulations for checks and balances. These documents outline federalism that has been embodied as a concept within each document, Furthermore the United States constitution clause known as supremacy clause is a necessary proper clause. The supremacy clause distinguishes the federal constitution from its state counterpart.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays