Preview

Similarities Between Julius Caesar And Brutus

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
344 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Julius Caesar And Brutus
How well do the two speeches combine the story? Well there was so much conspiracy and emotions all wrapped up into one as the two speeches were going on. Like Brutus was all about logic and the reality of the problem. Mark on the other hand wasn't. How did these two speeches compare to each other? Keep reading and find out.

Mark's speech after Julius death was all based on his emotions since he was a very good friend of Julius. He would talk about the emotions he was feeling because he did It for the appeal of the people. He used the tradgedy to get what he wanted from the other people. He milked the whole situation just so he could get what he wanted.For example Antony used Lepidus to seek revenge on the conspirators. He just used all he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Both Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln were very influential people of their time. They were both in power of a nation. To this day each man is still considered a respected leader by people around the world.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and JFK are similar in many ways. Julius Caesar was a Noble Military Leader of Rome, and John F. Kennedy was the 35TH President of The United States. Both Were Looked Up to and both, The People were very affected By both Assassinations.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Protagonists keep the plot of a story going, they are the ones we cling to and hope to see win in the end or die trying. In the outstanding play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, many characters play a very important role while many others are there simply to die. But the question still remains. Who exactly is the main character? Julius Caesar or noble Brutus? Both show the great acts of a protagonist, along with being the main eye throughout the story which would prove them to be the best choice for the role. They both flow through the story like hot butter, but not all butter lands on toast.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony speech was more effective because he reminded the plebeians that Julius Caesar was not ambitious due to that fact he rejected the crown three times. Brutus tells the plebeians the reasoning behind why he were to kill Caesar - that if he were not to kill Caesar, then everyone would die as slaves. Then he said “But, as he was ambitious, I slew him. “(III,ii, 28). In other words, Brutus says the reasoning behind why he killed Caesar was due to the fact that Caesar was ambitious. However, when Mark Antony…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    To what extent were the motives of Marcus Brutus and Cassius Longius conspiring against Julius Caesar political rather than personal?…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar were two great leaders in history. They became very powerful throughout their political reign. Although very different men, they were similar in many ways and certainly linked together upon their death.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli once stated,“He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.” This seems simple, but some don’t understand, including most in the play Julius Caesar. Mark Antony, one of the few who understands how to command, is a loyal friend who is gifted with the ability to use rhetorics, and is able to appeal to people’s hearts. While Brutus uses force and facts, Antony is able to lift others up while conspiring against them. It is a skill that comes into play later in the tragedy when Caesar is killed Antony takes it into his own hands to get even with the conspirators. By being able to command respect Antony is able to turn the throng of citizens against Cassius, Brutus, and the others. This is why Mark Antony…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are two of history greatest leaders, to compare them in their similarity and differences in my opinion would a simple task to do. In comparing them, they both were assassinated in office, killed at the theatre, was great leaders, had power, authority, and was in the military. These two great leaders died at the young age of 56, and impacted history with change, which ultimately got them assassinated. President Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States of American and he believed in equality for all people, and Caesar was Robin Hood, who stole from the rich and gave to the poor. They had many enemies, they fought wars on the battlefield as well in their political arena.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are two men who made history through their leadership expeditions. When comparing the two one thing that comes to mind is their assassination. Besides their similarity between the two assassinations, there are some differences. However, the major similarity between the two is the that they were both murdered. In fact, they were both carried out by people who disagreed with their power and authority as well as how they used it.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Brutus Like Caesar

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Does Marcus Brutus like Caesar? What does Brutus think of Caesar’s rise to power? .…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Brutus had the better speech. Brutus is saying he had to kill Caesar in order to make a free and prosperous country. He included that he was a close friend to Caesar and he was sad to see him go, but he had to for the best. In Brutus’s speech he said he loved Caesar, but not enough to let Rome…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The overlook of Brutus’s and Antony’s speeches are not similar at all in my eyes. Brutus’s speech was trying to show the citizens that there was no harm in killing Julius Caesar, which there was. Brutus partially manipulates the citizens by saying how much he really loved Caesar, but loved the city of Rome even more. The citizens were moved by his speech because of how protected they felt by his words. Brutus talks good of Caesar, saying how there are tears for his love, joy for his fortune, honor for his bravery, but then death for his ambition. He shows the crowd how it was for the better of them. On the other hand, Antony’s speech rowled up the citizens more than they were passionate about Brutus’s speech. Antony put more of an emotion in his speech to the people. He showed how incredible of a man Caesar was and even showed proof of his will. Obviously the crowd easily changed their opinions about the whole situation and Antony knew just what to say and do. Antony was calm about the whole speech even when the crowd was begging for him to read Caesar’s will. Antony blamed Caesar's murder…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays