Similarities Between Karl Marx And Ivan Turgenev

Every individual have their own perception in life and it’s their nature that distinguish them from rest of the people. Every people claims to be a good human being who thinks for the welfare of civilization of community as a whole but its their nature and behavior towards people which shows the real picture of a person rather than just believing on how one pictures himself to be in front of others. As per the author the two great European writers of the nineteenth century, Ivan Turgenev and Karl Marx, have completely different perception of human life, despite having same circumstances, situations, and preferences in life. Turgenev viewed human as one individual with character, feeling, strengths and weakness whereas Marx judged people according to class one belongs to rather than their personal nature and they way people react in certain situation. This kind of distinct nature
He doesn’t seem to be interested in other side of life where he can show love and freedom towards life. He’s writing doesn’t have any emotional connection and doesn’t show any kind of bonding to any of the relation. He himself was unqualified towards family relationship as his two daughters committed suicide as a result of his interference in their lives. Many writers for being far from the reality where as Turgenev’s “Mumu” was praised for the feel and understanding of other side of life and giving story imaginative, speculative, moralistic, protestant context which have made it for realistic criticize Marx’s “Manifesto”. He also knew the value of generalization and believed that human are able for improvement. Turgenev style of writing resembles social reformers like their language, their concerns, their style, and the categories in which they think. He views every person, as a single individual with there own personal character rather than a member of a particular class who act in a predetermined