Preview

The Social Exchange Theory in Interpersonal Relationships

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Social Exchange Theory in Interpersonal Relationships
Interpersonal communication is a form of communication that takes place between two people who have an established relationship. There are many different levels of interpersonal communication and theories of interpersonal communication. One of the theories that is used to explain changes in social behavior is the social exchange theory. The social exchange theory proposes that social behavior is the result of an exchange process between two people. The basic concept of the exchange theory is that it emphasizes the cost between the interactions of people and their social environment. Exchange theory attempts to explain human behavior under the content of a balanced-equal ratio within the distribution of giving and receiving. "At the heart of exchange is the notion of profits. Profits can consist of benefits (or rewards) with less costs (or punishments). Rewards may be material (economic) or symbolic (such as attention, advice, or status). They are generally things defined as something that either has value or bring satisfaction and gratification to the individual." (Canda, Chatterjee, & Robbins, 1998, p. 337). Some rewards can be granted based on either a person's acquirements or attributes. For example, a college student can achieve good grades due to their ability to possess excellent study habits and writing skills (acquirements), or the student can possibly receive good grades based primarily on their qualities such as race, gender, or economical status (attributes.). People receiving merits depending on their attributes may have the tendency to show an uneven or non-reciprocal exchange.

An exchange may include exchange of services, love, information, money and symbols of approval. The purpose of this exchange is to maximize benefits of one person and minimize costs of one person. People that give to others try to get from them, and people that get from others are under pressure to give to them. According to this theory, people weigh the potential benefits and



References: lau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley & Sons. Knapp, M. L., Vangelisti, A. L. (2005). Interpersonal Communication and HumanRelationships. (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson. Molm, L. D. (1991). Affect and Social Exchange: Satisfaction in Power-DependenceRelations. American Sociological Review. (Vol. 56, No. 4). Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (1998). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical perspective for social work. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Rusbult, C. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. (Vol. 25).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6 Assignment 3

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exchange operates within cultural norms, and social credit is preferable to social indebtedness. The language of Social Exchange theory betrays its assumption that we are all in it for ourselves. The basic formula for predicting the behavior for any properly socialized individual in any situation is: Behavior (Profits) = Rewards of interaction - Costs of Interaction.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Exchange Theory explores interactions between two parties by examining the costs and benefits to each. The theory proposed by Homans in 1958 is not exclusively applied to relationships as it also explores all social systems and considers the power balance within those systems. The key point of the theory is that it assumes the two parties are both giving and receiving items of value from each other. Under this theory, relationships are only likely to continue if both parties feel they are coming out of the exchange with more than they are giving up–that is, if there is a positive amount of benefit for both parties involved.…

    • 2618 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ashkanasy, N. M. & O 'Connor, C. 1997. Value congruence in leader-member exchange. Journal of Social Psychology. 137, p. 647-662.…

    • 8781 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    *Social Exchange theory: We weigh the pros and cons of rewards and consequences of our actions…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social exchange theory is a social psychological and sociological perspective that explains social change and stability as a process of negotiated exchanges between parties. Social exchange theory posts that all human relationships are formed by the use of a subjective cost-benefit analysis and the comparison of alternatives. Both sociology and psychology try to explain why human beings do what they do, and act in the manner in which they do. Social Exchange theory attempts to explain how we interact with one another and what we get from that interaction. According to Bielkiewicz (McEwen &Wills2014) theories known as exchange theories have their basis in philosophical perspective called utilitarianism. Three basic assumptions about individuals and exchange relations are added from economic theories. Some of the assumptions of social exchange theories as outlined by Turner (2013) are…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental concept of the theory of social exchange is cost and rewards. This means that cost and reward comparisons drive human decisions and behavior. Costs are the negative consequences of a decision, such as time, money and energy. Rewards are the positive results of social exchanges. Therefore, the generally accepted idea is that people will subtract the costs from the rewards in order to calculate value. For example, a person asks an acquaintance to help them move, but they only slightly know each other. The acquaintenance will assess their relationship history, the state of their relationship and the potential benefits. If the acquaintenance doesn’t feel close to the person and doesn’t plan on pursuing a social relationship, they may decline. However, if the person promises certain favors, such as helping out the acquaintance with a difficult problem, they may…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    French, J.P.R. & Raven, B. (2000). The Bases of Social Power. Studies in Social Power, 28(11), 73-88.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many worldviews that are contained within this article. One of those views is the exchange theory, which is people make judgments upon rewards they will receive in exchange for the price they must pay. Basically, people perform abnormal acts or behaviors because they see the end conclusion of their actions or…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Tale of Two Coaches

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    French, J. R., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Complexity of Management

    • 3410 Words
    • 14 Pages

    8. French, J. R.P., Jr. and Raven, B. (1959) The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (ed). Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, 150-67.…

    • 3410 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social exchange theory is a social psychological and sociological perspective that explains social change and stability as a process of negotiated exchanges between parties. Most exchanges are done with an expectation of reciprocity. Reciprocity is the expectation that people will respond to each other in similar ways. You repay a kind gesture with a kind gesture, a tit-for-tat kind of thing. Social exchange theorist argue that the choices we make are Guided by subjective evaluative processes. When the benefits of an action are high and the costs are low, the action will be valued. Social exchange there's also say that humans are fundamentally concerned with self-interest, we make rational decisions based on weighing cost and rewards of the…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Long before George Homans penned his articles and books on social exchange, “…attention should be called to Albert Chavannes who wrote on the subject of exchange in 1884” (Knox, 1963, p. 341). Chavannes edited a magazine called The Sociologist and he wrote a section specifically for the editor in which he spoke of “…social laws, declaring: It is the mission of Sociology to demonstrate that man obeys in his conduct as fixed and unchangeable laws as the winds or rain…”(Knox, 1963, p. 342). One of these laws which he spoke of was “The Law of Exchange where he states boldly that profitable exchange is the foundation upon which men have built society” (Knox, 1963, p. 342).…

    • 3340 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Social Exchange Theory

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The social exchange theory refers to relationships and interactions that are based on estimates of rewards and punishments. This theory is extremely important in society because many people have a cost versus benefit mindset. Whether or not the reward of a decision is worth the cost is a common thought or question in society. This idea is commonly found in studies of economics around the world. The social exchange theory explains many people’s behaviors and mindset when it comes to everyday choices. To understand this theory it is important to discuss the theorists who developed it, criticism and differing opinions, and connect it to observations in common situations.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psch

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The social exchange theory from Thibaut and Kelley (1959) assumes that relationship behaviour is based on individuals attempting to maximize their rewards and minimize their costs. This makes the decision on whether a relationship should be formed. Rewards could be being cared for or companionship whilst costs could be financial investment or effort. A comparison level, a standard which all present relationships are judged is formed. It is a product of our experiences in other relationships and also expectations of alternative relationships. If the profit of a new relationship exceeds the present relationship then it will be seen as attractive. Four stages are proposed in the development of a relationship: sampling (considering rewards and costs and comparing them to other relationships), bargaining (experimenting with these rewards and costs), commitment (starting to predict rewards and costs) and institutionalization (setting up rules).…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China EU Trade Relations

    • 25165 Words
    • 102 Pages

    The aim of this thesis is to analyze China-EU trade relations with focus on the period after 1975,…

    • 25165 Words
    • 102 Pages
    Good Essays