Attribution Theory – explains someone behavior by crediting the situation or person’s disposition
Fundamental Attribution Error – observers under estimate the situation or overestimate the person’s disposition
Defensive Attribution - More responsibility will be attributed to the harm-doer as the outcome becomes more severe, and as personal or situational similarity to the victim increases.
Attitudes – Feelings often influence by beliefs
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon – Something begins small and escalates from there
Role – a position
Cognitive Dissonance – If you believe you will achieve
Conformity – to go towards what others are doing
Informative vs. Normative social influence - conformity that occurs because of the desire to be correct versus conformity that occurs because of the desire to be liked and accepted
Social Facilitation - The tendency for people to do better on simple tasks when in the presence of other people.
Social Loafing - the phenomenon of people exerting less effort to achieve a goal when they work in a group than when they work alone.
Deindividuation - is a concept in social psychology that is generally thought of as the losing of self-awareness in groups, although this is a matter of contention
Diffusion of Responsibility - a sociopsychological phenomenon whereby a person is less likely to take responsibility for action or inaction when others are present.
Group Polarization - the tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of its members.
Groupthink - that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
Self-fulfilling prophecy - a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself, due to positive feedback between belief and behavior.
Stereotype - a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing.
Prejudice - preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
Discrimination - is action that denies social participation or human rights to categories of people based on prejudice.
Racism - the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
Ingroup bias - a pattern of favoring members of one's in-group over out-group members. This can be expressed in evaluation of others, in allocation of resources, and in many other ways.
Scapegoat theory – The theory the in jackpot seven otk scapegoat is good because you get four of them as opposed to hippo carnival
Social Trap - a term used by psychologists to describe a situation in which a group of people act to obtain short-term individual gains, which in the long run leads to a loss for the group as a whole. Examples of social traps include overfishing, energy "brownout" and "blackout" power outages during periods of extreme temperatures, the overgrazing of cattle on the Sahelian Desert, and the destruction of the rainforest by logging interests and agriculture.
Self-serving bias - any cognitive or perceptual process that is distorted by the need to maintain and enhance self-esteem.
Bystander Effect - a social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases in which individuals do not offer any means of help to a victim when other people are present.
Social exchange theory - a social psychological and sociological perspective that explains social change and stability as a process of negotiated exchanges between parties.
GRIT - non-cognitive trait based on an individual's passion for a particular long-term goal or endstate, coupled with a powerful motivation to achieve their respective objective.
Superordinate goals - are where two or more people or groups must be involved to achieve a specific goal.
Altruism - the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others.
Aggression - hostile or violent behavior or attitudes toward another; readiness to attack or confront.
Frustration-aggression principle - theory says that aggression is the result of blocking, or frustrating, a person's efforts to attain a goal.
Mere exposure effect - a psychological phenomenon by which people tend to develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them.
Equity - this is a situation in which people receive in proportion to what they give to the relationship.
Self-disclosure - a process of communication through which one person reveals himself or herself to another.
Just-world phenomenon - is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, to the end of all noble actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished.
Reciprocity norm & social responsibility norm – People will help people who help them and People will help those dependent on them
Truth wins – The true thing wins
Majority wins – The majority has the advantage
First shift rule - In this method first of all, the participants are divided according to what they want. And if one of the members of either of the groups changes his mind the decision is made according to that.
Conflict – Differences between 2 people or beliefs
Fundamental Attribution Error - Lee Cobb said that if the boy screamed out loud, “I’ll kill ya” he must have really meant he was gonna kill his father, and so this was good evidence that he did it. However, Henry Fonda later insulted Lee Cobb by calling him a sadist. Cobb got mad and said: “I’m gonna kill ya.” But he didn’t really mean it. Thus, when Cobb said it, it was just the situation that elicited this expression, but when the boy said it, it was an indication of his murderous rage.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The intent of this paper is to discuss the dynamics of a group of coworkers and peers form the perspective of social psychology. The group will be analyzed in relation to the formation of norms, roles, hierarchy, potential groupthink, and any communication patterns as observed.…
- 1273 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: In Labeling Theory, a state in which a person feels the stress and anxiety of being labeled, and thus feels the need to right the wrongs and restore balance. (p.117)…
- 1176 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
* Group thinking – we are all members of groups (social classes, religions etc.) and all of these groups, intentionally or not, exert pressure on our views.…
- 280 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…
- 4273 Words
- 18 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There is PSY 301 Week 5 Final Paper Social Psychology Bringing It All Together in this pack…
- 632 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
* Blaming: You hold other people responsible for your pain, or take the other tack and blame yourself for every problem or reversal.…
- 567 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The psychological term for this is groupthink, which is a subconscious occurence in the human mind. To propagate this idea, there is also the social pressure that is put on the individuals. Because of this, people would be too afraid to even question the grey area. With the apprehension lying on everyone’s mind, people began to think like each other as a means of survival. Consequently, it became hard for one voice to speak out and counter what the majority is saying, thereby solidifying his control.…
- 1514 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The process of groupthink is when one feels that membership in a particular group is important, the individual may allow the group to pressure them into pushing one’s own values aside and rationalize or…
- 1594 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
explains why people behave differently than normal when they are amongst a group of people.…
- 273 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
2. They also argue that there is a diffusion of blame – i.e. when several people are at fault for not intervening, each individual feels they were not to blame for the neglect.…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This activity explores the issue of social influence—how the behavior of other people affects your behavior.…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
the situation. Social influence on our mind is the factor which plays critical role in our life.…
- 636 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
15. Actor-observer bias: the tendency to attribute other people's behavior to internal causes while attributing our own behavior to external causes…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In social psychology there are many researchers who investigated and challenged different theories within including well respected psychologists including; Sheriff(1935); Jenness(1932); Asch(1951); Crutchfield(1955) and Mann(1969). The aim of the study was; guessing how many sweeties were in the jar in a competition fashion and testing if the participants conformed to their guesses. The hypothesis was ' people would conform under group pressures of the pre-set guesses. The null hypothesis was that people would not conform under group pressures unless due to extraneous variables. The experiment was a field experiment using the techniques of independent groups design. The experiment was dressed as a competition based on the following three conditions; high pre-set; control pre-set and low pre-set guesses. The group used random selection in three math classes with the senior pupils of three different levels (higher, intermediate one and intermediate two). The IV (independent variable) that was used was the pre-set guesses and the DV (dependent variable) was the level of conformity performed by the participants. The conclusion of the results showed that 31.25% of the high pre-set guesses conformed (in the reign of 40+), 23.33% of the low pre-set guesses conformed (in the reign of -30) and 43.48% of the control pre-set guesses conformed (within the reign of 25-45). The breakdown of the analysis for instance the mean of all conditions and overall, the range of all conditions and control(appendix 13). After the group completed the experiment thought was put into how testing conformity could be continued. The ideas from the experiment could lead to testing the intelligence levels of people who conform and test is this level of intelligence has an effect on the level of conformity.…
- 2355 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays