Sociological Perspective On Death Penalty

Austin Spackman
Sociology 1010
Theoretical Perspectives Paper

The Death Penalty
Throughout history, and in every culture that has ever inhabited the earth, there has always been some sort of capital punishment, or the death penalty. It may not have been an official ceremony or ritual, but it has always been present in some sort or another. Even in modern times, humans practice the death penalty. America has held 1226 executions since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. (Facts about the Death Penalty) Because capital punishment still exists, there are several different opinions of why it is beneficial to society, as well as it is bad. This paper will discuss the death penalty from the three
Sociological Perspectives: Functionalism, Conflict Theorem, and Symbolic
Interactionism.

Functionalism
The first sociological perspective mentioned is Functionalism. A functionalism sociologist looks for how different ideas or subjects of society function together and the role each of them play. A functionalist looks at the death penalty in many ways and has several different reasons for using the death penalty. One reason a functionalist may think the death penalty is necessary for society is to rid society of extreme criminals. By sustaining the death penalty,

society is able to take the most extreme of criminals out of society so they are no longer a threat.
Another role of the death penalty is to free prison space. Currently the 50 largest jail systems house a third of all jail inmates. Nineteen of these operate at or above their rated capacities
. (Montaldo, Charles) Throughout the nation, prisons are over crowded and there aren’t enough resources to house and incarcerate inmates. The death penalty gives a way to eliminate the most extreme of criminals, therefore creating more space and freeing resources.
Some people may say the death penalty acts as a deterrent for criminals.
They believe criminals fear the death penalty; consequently they will hesitate and think before committing a crime. However, a recent survey suggests 88% of many former and present presidents of the Country’s top academic criminological societies deny this claim and say the death penalty is no deterrent to criminals.
(Facts about the Death Penalty)
Other people believe the death penalty saves taxpayer’s money. The death penalty does save money by not needing to feed, clothe, guard, and shelter these inmates. However, The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases. Carrying out one death sentence costs 2­5 times more than keeping that same criminal in prison for the rest of his life.

Conflict Theory
A conflict theorist looks at society and how different aspects conflict with

one another, instead of how they function, as with functionalism. A conflict theorist studies the death penalty by finding what conflicts it creates and how it causes inequality.
One conflict that arises is that of race and social class.
Statistics show that people of color and lower social class appear on death row more than whites.
People of color have accounted for a disproportionate 43 % of total executions since 1976 and 55 % of those currently awaiting execution.
(Race and the Death Penalty)

Symbolic Interactionism
The third sociological perspective deals with how different aspects of society are symbolic of something and what those symbols might mean. A symbolic interactionist views the death penalty in many different ways. Many symbolic interactionists believe the death penalty is a way to fulfill the ancient principle of an “Eye for an Eye”. Another belief is that the death penalty brings peace to the victim’s family by helping them know that the person that wronged them has met received their justice and no one else will be hurt by them.
One conflict that arises when examining the death penalty from the viewpoint of a symbolic interactionist is the whether or not humans have the right to kill another human. Some people believe there is no crime on earth worthy of the punishment of death, especially when another human is administering
that punishment. Picking a Viewpoint Although each Sociological Perspective makes sense in some way or

another, it seems that the Functionalism Perspective best explains the subject of capital punishment. It suggests some very good reasons as to why the death penalty is beneficial to society and how it can be used to make society better.

Conclusion
In conclusion, capital punishment is good for society because it gets rid of extreme criminals who have no chance of parole and therefore have no chance of becoming better people. It also frees prison space and resources, making room for other criminals and felons. Finally, although some may not believe so, the death penalty may act as a deterrent to criminals, making them think of the consequences before they commit a crime.

Works Cited
Facts about the Death Penalty
. Washington, D.C.: Death Penalty Information
Center, 10 Sept. 2010. PDF.
Montaldo, Charles. "U.S. Prisons ­ How Crowded Are U.S. Prisons?"
Crime and
Punishment Home Page
. Web. 30 Nov. 2010.
<http://crime.about.com/od/prison/a/bjs040720.htm>.
"Race and the Death Penalty."
American Civil Liberties Union
. Web. 30 Nov.
2010. <http://www.aclu.org/capital­punishment/race­and­death­penalty>.