is an intriguing question because the results lead to some surprising conclusions. Either anything can become pious because the gods wish it so or there is piety that exists independent of the gods. Socrates is really asking if morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God. Both sides to this dilemma seem to undermine the omnipotence of God. This type of argument only seems to work for theists because I could deny the existence of God altogether. However, philosophers like E.O. Wilson suggest that morals do not come from God but are the result of biological processes like evolution and natural selection.
is an intriguing question because the results lead to some surprising conclusions. Either anything can become pious because the gods wish it so or there is piety that exists independent of the gods. Socrates is really asking if morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God. Both sides to this dilemma seem to undermine the omnipotence of God. This type of argument only seems to work for theists because I could deny the existence of God altogether. However, philosophers like E.O. Wilson suggest that morals do not come from God but are the result of biological processes like evolution and natural selection.