However, there has been an uproar concerning this so called “duty” the Sports Illustrated magazine has. A study done by the Department of Sociology at the University of Louisville found that out of the 716 Regular Sports Illustrated magazines, not the Women’s edition had published only 35 female athletes between 2000 and 2011. That’s 4.9% and that’s is absolutely crazy to think. To add to that, of all the women featured on the front cover of Sports Illustrated Women’s Edition, majority of them are models. Why would models need to be placed on the front cover of a Sports Illustrated Magazine! They have nothing to do with the world of sports. It depicts females and it continues to show the underrepresentation of how females are supposed to look. If one thinks of a model, they think of someone with little body fat percentage and someone who may starve themselves for a …show more content…
Mass media is one of the most influential agents in society that glorifies the masculinity and muscular image of sports (Jones, Murrell, & Jackson, 1999). Media may not purposefully marginalize or trivialize women’s sports, but there are many evidences documenting that media favored and emphasized men’s sports and masculinity (Cooky, Messner & Hextrum, 2013). If female sports had received any significant media coverage, the representation was often flooded with sexism, racism, homophobia, and ageism (Pye & Stroud, 2011; Fisher, Withycombe, & Prewitt, 2010). It’s unfortunate that as a leading publication with quality journalism, Sports Illustrated hasn’t improved its record and its support on female athletes. They have the opportunity to change the history of women in sports but rather continue to choose models and male athletes as the basis of their