Strategy as Simple Rules.
Subject: Business Strategy.
Word Count: 1497
Contents:
Introduction 3
Summery 4
Critique 5
Conclusion 7
References 7
Plagiarism test 8
Strategy As Simple Rules.
Introduction:
In this report I’m going to critique the article that talk about strategy as a simple rules. Talk about what is good for companies that author mentioned about in article, and what is bad. How they should set their strategic approach, and why they should, or not use strategy as simple rules. Now day’s business is so complex that companies has no choice as to simplify their strategies. Some companies already found the way of simplifying, or so you can call making it hard but easier for complex business, by just doing new approach: hard-and-fast rules, straightforward that define direction without confining it. However some companies such as Consider Enron and AES in energy, Ispat International in steel, CEMEX in cement, and Vodafone and Global Grossing in telecommunications have excelled without the advantages of superior resources or strategic positions. “Bureaucracy and the segmentation of the hierarchy structure in the matrix of formal positions in the triangular diagram, organizational procedures centralized at the top of the hierarchy of specialized units of employees basic skills decisions on policies and procedures to trace the chain of command, characteristic of Western capitalist democracies normally and naturally raised people follow this model = that society and the organization must be organized around a formal, objective,
References: Naima K. 2012. Transcript of Traditional strategies of Organization. Traditional Strategies of Organizing. Prezi.com. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. Donald N. S. 2013. Strategy as Simple Rules. Harvard Business Review.