Summary Of Nick Bostrom's Simulation Theory

Murder is wrong, but the simulation theory might not agree with that. Nick Bostrom published a paper proposing the simulation theory; a world that exist inside a computer. Assuming Bostrom’s theory is true, then not only do we exist in an augmented virtual reality, but that we could get away with killing another human being. I will first explain the simulation theory, then state the fact that we cannot be held responsible for murder, and then finally conclude with an objection expressing that murder is still morally wrong, simulated world or no. The simulation has three components that could possibly be true. (1) First, the human race will cease to exist. With our extinction, the idea of a “posthuman” race will vanish. (2) If we managed to reach our “posthuman” stage, it’s not likely they’ll create a simulated reality that mimics their ancestors. Finally, (3) we are actually living in a simulated reality. All of which are probable, but atleast one has to be true. To briefly explain, I will focus more on the (3) third component; that we are basically living in a simulated reality. That would include the physical aspects, such as a our planet or a human body, to more intangible things like emotions or personal thoughts. The third component is vital to the concept of free will, mainly because it cannot exist.
Being morally responsible would be like being held accountable for our actions. Having free will would also be like have another option available always. It is widely understood and agreed on that murdering people is a morally wrong decision, considering that no one would usually want to have their life ended. If anyone would commit murder, they will be presented the alternative options before the murder took place, and if they do choose to kill someone, then they will be held accountable for