Sun Tzu is the author of “Art of War”, one of the most influential and sought-after books about strategies in battles. However, the Art of War now applied in other fields like politics, business, sports and many more. Sun Tzu is a military general and philosopher who led several battles into a success with the use of deception, manipulation and unpredictable tactics. Sun Tzu was believed to have lived in the period of warring states. He worked under the leadership of Wu, a small semi-barbaric state. Wu, a neighboring kingdom, once conquered Chu and won. After some time, Nang Wa, the prime minister of Wu, decided to kill some of the royal descendants of the Chu kingdom in fear of being a victim of their revenge. Years passed by and Wu decided to conquer the Chu with Sun Tzu now on their side. Nang Wa led the troops of Wu. The Chu’s plan was to simultaneously attack the Wu soldiers from the front and the back. However, there were some conflicts between Nang Wa and his other leaders which led their plan to fail and making Sun Tzu in an advantage point. Sun Tzu’s strategy on the other hand was to retreat but advancing at the same time. He lured the troops of Chu into a deceit trap right from the start by losing. The Chu lost battles one after the other. Sun Tzu also faked defeat until the Chu advanced very deep into Wu land where the best Wu fighters are. The first few soldiers were the old and sick while they placed the hungry and strong soldiers at the end where the opponent lost most of its energy. One of his principles that is applicable in this battle is “Know your enemy and yourself and you will never be in Peril.”
Sun Tzu’s principle were also helpful in the Vietnam War. Ho Chi Minh, the leader of Vietnam at that time, is similar to Sun Tzu. They both believed that it is better to outthink the opponent rather than outfighting them. Besides this, Ho Chin Minh were also appealed to Sun Tzu’s principle such as the one mentioned above “to learn to understand both the enemy and yourself, to seek out his weaknesses and your own strengths, and act accordingly.” One application of this that is shown in the film is how the Vietnamese use their knowledge of the battlefield (it is their own country) to surprisingly attack the Americans like the use of surprise bombs. Another example is the idea of the Vietnamese to dug underground to make a secret passage and a trap for the Americans. Ho Chin Minh also applied to his leadership the principle of Sun Tzu to make ample use of subterfuge and stratagem in order to defeat or disarm your adversary as well as to use outright violence only when absolutely necessary in the belief that political struggle was more effective than military struggle especially considering that Americans has more firepower than did his own forces. However, both of them still believe the importance of military strength. One of the techniques of Sun Tzu that was applied by Ho Chi Minh is putting his Vietnamese soldier in death ground, making them understand that they’re land is being conquered and that they’re families are in jeopardy so that they would transform and fight at their best. Sun Tzu’s concepts of the four important factors in a battle also helped the Vietnamese win the war. These four factors are the weather, terrains, leadership and military power. Lastly, the most important principle that helped the Vietnamese was the concept of spies. Vietnamese planted spies on a bar near the American base where they usually hang out. This helped in getting an insight and preparing the Vietnamese or sabotaging the plans of the opponent. The battle of the allied forces at the Normandy also applied Sun Tzu’s art of war’s principles. In the year 1944, the allies were faced with a challenged of an attack by the allied when their battleships landed on the Normandy beaches. The Germans had the most advanced technology. They have foreknowledge or the encrypting, decoding and intercepting messages of the opponents. They were able to anticipate the plans of the opponents and thus prepare for it. Similarly, foreknowledge is a type of spying. Sun Tzu was a huge believer in the use of spies. Germans also used spies. However, Sun Tzu also found a way to deal with spies which he called cross-over. Cross-over spies are also called double agents who used to work for one group but was converted by the opposing group to provide the opposition with false information. During this battle, the spies sent by the Germans to sneak into the allied forces was discovered the Britain and thus converted them to double agents, which are now being paid by Britain to give Germans wrong information about were the Allied Forces would be landing at. They asked the spies to tell the Germans that the allied forces would be landing at Calais which would be really landing at Normandy and thus they focused all their attention there opening all their other ports and bases allowing the opponents to freely attack them. Another Sun Tzu principle applied in this battle is the bombing of the Germans from the north to make it seem that the allied forces are really coming from that direction and moving to the north and leading the Germans to follow and move further to the north to support was being bombed. Like what Sun Tzu said “make your enemy prepare on his left and he will be weak on his right”. The success of the allied forces in winning the war was mainly because of this reason and the cross-over spies. Another factor that led to the failure of the Germans in the war is their chain of command system. Sun Tzu says that “it is important that generals are not constrained by their leaders”. The German generals are in direct control of Hitler so the final call comes only from Hitler and the generals are not allowed to make their decisions of their own, they should always wait for Hitler’s go signal. Another problem with this is that Hitler tends to make wrong decisions.
The last battle is at Johannesburg. We weren’t able to finish the film so I just researched the battle in the internet. According to the references, the Johannesburg was a battle civil war caused by inequality in the past, people in poverty and alienated communities that refuse to live together. One of Sun Tzu’s principle that was applied in this batlle was "The art of war teaches us to rely not only on the likelihood of the enemy not coming but on our own readiness to receive him; not on the chance of him not attacking but rather on the fact the we have made our position unassailable."
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Written by Chinese tactician Sun Tzu, the Art of War presents the basic principles of warfare and gives military leaders advice and instructions on when and how to fight. The Art of War is written in a very simple and direct manner. Sun Tzu’s work can easily be grasped and his principles understood. There is however a strong sense of morality required to achieving success with these principles. Approached in a holistic and integrated way, each principle is interlocked with the others to form a sum greater than its parts in a direct and concise…
- 96 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
army. The Mongols sometimes used psychological warfare to trick their enemies into giving up or to…
- 1031 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
maxims, Sun Tzu had 13 principles, but Nathan Bedford Forrest 's advice was the utmost…
- 2359 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…
- 1853 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
On January 22, 1917, Woodrow Wilson made one final, attempt to avert war, delivering a moving address that correctly declared only a “peace without victory” (beating Germany without embarrassing them) would be lasting.…
- 1407 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
deserve to receive this unbearable loss? It makes others wonder is it worth all of the suffering in this war? How many of our brothers and sisters have to pass before we realize the true negatives of the war? Close relatives and friends of these fallen soldiers may be so hurt from such a horrific loss that they are never able to fully recover. Making not only the dead soldiers victim, but also the family and friends of the soldier. Some of the victims close friends and family may never fully recover from a loss of this magnitude. Making it harder yet on the family creating not only an emotional problem but it physical problem due to depression and other side effects. For those lucky enough to return to their families, their recovery is…
- 1183 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Soldiers at War. Stories! They are amazing to listen to as you feel connected to a writer or connected to the speaker. Stories tell two sides of things on each perspective on how both sides feel. Like In The Things They Carry and Sorrows of War we are able to know how both sides felt and what they went through while they were at war.…
- 896 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In my opinion, no, it doesn’t. Both people are in the wrong in some ways, but Washington seems to have more of a right. He tried to bring peace and didn’t really like killing. Mohammed said killing was life and that you have to.…
- 274 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Mo Tzu’s Against Music is not against Music: How Mo Tzu critiques early Chinese Class based society in their Musical Practices…
- 1983 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Dulce et Decorum est by Wilfred Owen and Homecoming by Bruce Dawe are about the disaster of war, yet they speak of different wars with different mindsets of the soldiers. In the following essay I discuss the history behind the poems, the poetic devices that Owen and Dawe used. Each poem addresses their own truths about war.…
- 880 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Lao Tzu talks about the art of living in peace, deep wisdom and world with no wars or fighting. He believes that Weapons are tools used to fear people and the wise man should avoid using them, except in the dire necessity. Which means to act only when it's necessary. Unlike Machiavelli who thinks that the strength of your country should be measured by the ability to fight. In his opinion, it helps you to take control over the country and gain respect. But according to Lao Tzu, you cannot gain…
- 688 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the Vietnam War, Ho Chi Minh the leader of North Vietnam, ruled for most of the war. He had many different political strategies however his most efficient ones were his ways of gaining support, his speeches and words of encouragement, and his use of the Viet Minh. His strategy of gaining support was efficient, because it not only helped him, but he could also assist other countries. Even if the supporting countries were enemies, Ho Chi Minh was not put on the spot and he would still be able to help both countries as supporters. Also, this tactic got a lot of support from his people. His speeches and words of encouragement were more efficient, because it would push more Vietnamese people to get involved in the war. Citizens like to know…
- 235 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The American Revolution and Vietnam wars were fought and won using the tactics and principles outlined by Mao Tse Tung, who is considered to be the father of guerilla warfare. These principles are outlined in three phases: 1. Defense or survival, 2. Equilibrium or small scale offense, and 3. Offense or decisive stage. All three phases were effectively deployed by both insurgents to decisively defeat a well equipped, trained and financed Army.…
- 108 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
I feel that the rules made by Sun Tzu were made to make war more respectful and to make it a fair battle, was is so respected that there is certain times for war and certain times for a cease fire throughout the…
- 2096 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays