You’re probably thinking, “Thousands of children are adopted each year—why should I have to contribute?” Well, if you compare the number of orphaned or homeless children to the number of those children actually being adopted, the difference is unfortunately extreme. There are still so many children waiting to be adopted and finally given a family, and there are so many reasons to take part in that. For instance, there are millions of couples around the world wanting to start a family but are not able to conceive and have a child of their own; adoption gives that choice back to them, and couples are still able to pursue that dream of having a family of their…
Many women that get unexpectedly pregnant and cannot care for a child want to find a home for their unborn where they will be taken care of. However, in some cases this can mean the child goes into foster care, orphanages, or up for adoption. This can be very beneficial for some children as they have someone that can take care of them, but on average each year “almost 270,000 youth ‘age out’ of foster care without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed” and some children are in the system for three years or longer living in up to three different households (Carter). This puts thousands of children out into the adult world with little to no guidance and complete independence which many are not ready for. Places like orphanages or foster homes only keep children until they are adopted, reunited with their old family, or turn eighteen and are put into the real world to be an “adult”.…
There’s an abundance of people who would give anything in the world just to be able to have a family of their own, and to create offspring. Several people within society depend on adoption to make their dreams of being parents come true. Abortion cost a great sum of money while adoption does not cost you anything. When you compare adoption or abortion the pro’s for adoption are immensely clear. When you adopt, your pregnancy ends with life and you feel better about your decision versus abortion where your pregnancy will end with death and you will probably regret for a long span of time. Also, with adoption you remember giving birth, and get to see your child and hold it, while with abortion you will remember taking a life and never experiencing interaction with your child. Numerous people base their decisions for the future of their child off of first instincts and emotions instead of giving themselves time to consider what is best for the child and it’s future. Typically whenever people make decisions without thinking they will regret them for the rest of their life. No one wants to wake up every morning regretting their decision to abort every single day and their past actions to affect their everyday lifestyles. Abortion limits the child’s ability to succeed in…
1)Adoption is the "better alternative". Many orphans grow up with mental instability (according to ehow.com) Further, many of the pro-life supporters…
Many teenagers are getting pregnant and not able to keep their children. There are many reasons why teenagers decide to give up their child, they are in school, they don’t have the money or they can’t support the baby or themselves. Adoption is the answer for many of these teenagers. There are two kinds of adoptions open and closed. An open adoption is when the original parents are allowed to visit and communicate with their child. A closed adoption is where there is no contact allowed. Today open adoptions are seen to be more beneficial than closed adoptions. I’m adopted and I have an open adoption and I feel that it is very beneficial to me. In order to understand an open adoption…
Most adoptions involve minor children in a legal process that profoundly affects them for the rest of their lives. It is imperative that professionals involved in adoptions act ethically to safeguard the rights of vulnerable…
Open adoption birth parents experience a sense of less guilt as a benefit (Gray 27) of the adoption but what benefit does the child rear? Adoption should be more for the child and less for the birth parents emotional ground. But closed adoption does give the birth parents privacy because “placing a child for adoption is an extremely sensitive and vulnerable choice. Having a closed adoption creates an opportunity for a stronger sense of privacy,” (“N. A. I. C. H.” 1) and it can also reduce fear because “some birth mothers are concerned about explaining their choice, and a closed adoption serves as a way to prevent them from a confrontation with a child placed for adoption” (“N. A. I. C. H.” 1). Closed adoption rids the birth parents of the responsibility they were not ready for in the first place and gives the child a chance at a better life with more responsible individuals. In some cases, closed adoption kills two birds with one stone by riding a birth parent of the embarrassment of not being prepared or financially stable for a child while giving the adoptive child a chance for a better life with an adoptive family that is looking for a child to give love and a good life…
The government must focus more on revising this in order to increase the number of adopted children. Typically, prospective parents unable to have biological children are the main people who turn to adoption. Studies found, however, that only 10-25% of all infertile couples actually pursue adoption (Newman). This means that the greater majority choose between seeking expensive infertility treatments and remaining childless. All facts point to the adoption process itself being the reason behind these low numbers. As the years passed and more protocols were installed, adoption agencies became more and more selective on who can adopt. It did this in order to ensure that children would get placed in a suitable home with caring and loving parents, especially since many of these kids already experienced severe abuse from their biological parents. All of these restrictions, however, also cause many to give up partway through the process because they feel both mentally and financially drained and typically still have many years to go before they can bring home their new child. Don Simkovich, the director of church relations at The Child Share Program, Inc., referred to the procedure as “a roller coaster of emotions, paperwork, and love that takes an adventurous spirit to navigate” (qtd. in Newman). Unfortunately,…
Adoption has been practiced around the world since the beginning of civilization for orphaned or abandoned children. In the United States adoptions were arranged by individuals and families until the 20th century. Beginning in the mid 1900’s adoption agencies took over in helping place children in suitable homes. Adoption can be a fulfilling adventure for adopted people and their new families. The joys of having a new member or person in your life is an incredible feeling. Being an adopted person is not an identity or a disease. Adoption is the process by which one person joins a family unit that supports development of the whole person. Throughout the past years the amount of foster-care children waiting to be adopted fell from 62,759 in 2011 to 58,587 in 2012. You may hear many people arguing about if they favor or dislike adoption. What are the different mindsets of people on the subject of…
It limits a form of childcare that is proven to be effective and beneficial. The reasons and history behind the government’s biased view of these facilities is still unclear. Orphanages offer many disadvantaged children distinct advantages over foster care, some of which are structure, stability, and a sense of permanence. Children’s homes permit siblings to stay together, afford children a chance to develop moral and religious values, encourage a sense of responsibility and work ethic, as well as much needed education and job-related skills. There is great potential for orphanages to meet the needs of the many children who currently languish for years in the modern foster care system. It is time for policymakers to recognize the distinct advantages institutional care can provide.…
In the case of the child being taken away from her foster parents, it would seem as though there is no way to make a decision without someone getting hurt in the end. On one end, the birth parents made the horrible decision to do drugs and were unable to care for their daughter. While they did become rehabilitated, it took them a very long time to do so. On the other end, the foster parents were only temporarily legal guardians of the girl. So the question I think everyone would ask themselves is “would the child benefit more from being returned to the people who gave her life or would she benefit more from being with the people who have raised her and loved her as their own?” In my opinion, I believe it would have been best if the foster…
Imagine replacing all abortions with adoption. There would be thousands of children sitting in foster care waiting for a family to adopt them, while wondering why their biological family didn’t want them. Not to mention the foster care system would be more flooded than it already is. Studies find that one in five kids who were in foster care will become homeless after 18; at 24 only half will be employed; less than 3% would have earned a college degree; 71% of women will be pregnant by 21; and one in four will have experienced post-traumatic stress disorder at twice the rate of United States war veterans. And often many are at risk of moving back into government systems – from juvenile centers to prison. (Soronen, 2014) The foster care system in America isn’t the most appealing. Most stories you hear from children who have lived through it often are about abuse and neglect in their foster care homes. Not to forget how adoption can negatively affect the biological parents. Most go through an immense grieving process that may last for decades. In one study by the Child Welfare Information Gateway, three-quarters of birth mothers still experience feelings of loss 12 to 20 years after placing their newborns. With carrying the baby for nine months you grow an attachment and bond. Many women are put in a position where they can’t provide for their baby or give them a good life, so they selflessly give them up for adoption hoping for the baby to have a better life than what they could have given them. There is a big chance that their baby doesn’t get that better life, and they end up staying in the foster care system, getting all of the downfalls of it. The way the foster care system is today it would be more selfish to put your child through that than to abort…
Children at these orphanages are being neglected of the biggest human necessity which is affection.…
A lot of children become orphans because their parents give birth to them accidentally. In recent years, I have heard of a lot of such cases. I remember that there was one last week: after a woman had given birth to a baby, she put it into a plastic bag and left it in a rubbish bin. When the baby was discovered by people afterwards, it had already died. I wonder if the baby was saved, it would be another orphan. I believe that if people would like to give birth to a baby, they have to take up their responsibilities of taking care of the baby…
If you put a child up for adoption at least that child will have a life and you will know that he or she is going to be well taken care of. If you take away the life that a baby could have than you are taking away all the possibilities of him or her being a successful doctor or anything they want to be. It is not anybody else’s choice to decide whether or not that baby gets to live because that is God’s decision and should only be His. People fifty years ago and farther back did not have the option of killing their unborn child just because they didn’t want it or could not afford it. When someone got pregnant back in the fifties they married the father and got jobs to support themselves. They didn’t just say oh I don’t want this baby and then killed it. Back then people actually took responsibility for their actions and made as good of a life as they could for their family. Today, people think that they can play God and decide that the baby should just die. Under no circumstances should anyone think they have the right to take a life for any reason. Adoption agencies were established so that children without families could be adopted into new families to have a better life. Also, so that expecting mothers who thought they could not take care of a child, could put their baby into an adoption home so the baby at…