The security at places where guns can be bought should be increased. Guns should have an emergency tracker, so that if they are somehow stolen the police can catch the thief. If someone escaped with a stolen gun they would be caught by the police and arrested. It is possible to make a scanner that sends an alarm if the gun detects that someone who is not the owner is using the gun. If someone stole the gun and tried to use it, the gun would send a message to the police and/or the owner so the police could arrest the criminal. The only way to stop criminals with guns is to either to oppose them with another gun or to disable their gun. Banning gun ownership would have many negative impacts. Police officers need guns to defend themselves, so if they own them they will technically be criminals. The people that enforce the law and keep criminals off the streets will be criminals themselves if they have a weapon that they will almost certainly need. According to Wayne LaPierre, the Executive Vice President of the NRA, "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun" (Should more gun control laws be enacted). If a dangerous person has a gun, then only someone else with a gun can stop him or her without a large number of lives being lost. According to Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?, “Gun control does not deter crime, gun ownership deters crime” (ProCon.org). Criminalizing guns would just backfire and cause the opposite of what it is supposed to. Gun ownership should still continue but there should be more security over guns. For different reasons guns should still be legal because they are sometimes needed for defense. It is true that there are some advantages to gun control. However there are too many disadvantages to gun control for it to work out. Just don’t get shot on the
The security at places where guns can be bought should be increased. Guns should have an emergency tracker, so that if they are somehow stolen the police can catch the thief. If someone escaped with a stolen gun they would be caught by the police and arrested. It is possible to make a scanner that sends an alarm if the gun detects that someone who is not the owner is using the gun. If someone stole the gun and tried to use it, the gun would send a message to the police and/or the owner so the police could arrest the criminal. The only way to stop criminals with guns is to either to oppose them with another gun or to disable their gun. Banning gun ownership would have many negative impacts. Police officers need guns to defend themselves, so if they own them they will technically be criminals. The people that enforce the law and keep criminals off the streets will be criminals themselves if they have a weapon that they will almost certainly need. According to Wayne LaPierre, the Executive Vice President of the NRA, "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun" (Should more gun control laws be enacted). If a dangerous person has a gun, then only someone else with a gun can stop him or her without a large number of lives being lost. According to Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?, “Gun control does not deter crime, gun ownership deters crime” (ProCon.org). Criminalizing guns would just backfire and cause the opposite of what it is supposed to. Gun ownership should still continue but there should be more security over guns. For different reasons guns should still be legal because they are sometimes needed for defense. It is true that there are some advantages to gun control. However there are too many disadvantages to gun control for it to work out. Just don’t get shot on the