This is viewed as too broad and vague by the Free Speech Coalition. Under Miller v. California pornography can only be banned if it is considered obscene and without redeeming social value or rather if it would offend the average person. The problem with the CPPA was that even film and art, for example ideas produced centuries ago would be considered a violation. According to the First Amendment there is a difference between actions and words; although, certain categories of speech are protected especially those concerning children, those protected categories were not included in the CPPA. The speech used in the CPPA was not remarkable enough to persuade others to break the law; therefore, it cannot be banned. Because the language used was much too vague it was ruled that the prohibitions of the CPPA were overboard and…
6. What is the remedy for the possible harm that may be produced by pornography?…
In her essay, ‘Let’s Put Pornography Back in the Closet,’ Susan Brownmiller expresses her discontent with the First Amendment in that she opines it has been wrongly applied therefore leading to its failure to abate pornography. In contrast she views that the First Amendment has been used to proliferate pornography and pornographic material in a number of ways that she outlines in her essay.…
It is my feelings that pornography should be censored and no it does not violate the First Amendment. I am not as well versed on the Constitution of the United States as I would like to be, but I do know that the First Amendment is intended to allow freedom of religion, the right to exercise that religion; freedom of speech, individual or the press; freedom to peaceably assemble; and the freedom to petition the Government for any grievances. I also realize that amendments are subject to interpretation, and some court rulings of the years have altered the actual interpretation of this amendment. The intended purpose was to protect individuals and groups from persecution for practicing their beliefs. Society as a whole has put limitations on…
The recipe for a strong argument is comprised of two main facets. One is its ability to persuade and the other its ability to reason. It’s possible for an argument to persuade without reason, but if an article lacks reason and fails to persuade it’s left completely exposed. Alice Bailey and Laura Tallman’s article, “Internet filters are gates, not erasers, to protect kids in library” which appeared in 2009 in The Press Democrat, exemplifies an argument that attempts to persuade while lacking credibility, reason and accountability. The focus of Bailey and Tallman’s article is to persuade the reader to support the idea of internet filters in public libraries in attempt to protect children from pornographic images, to which they claim carry incomparable danger. The article uses fear as a means to persuade and to make up for its substantial lack of evidence and organization. It is is scattered with loaded language and proof surrogates while all together presenting a false dilemma to the reader, which is intolerable in a topic that surrounds the First Amendment. For these reasons the “Gates” article is unacceptable and fails as an argumentative piece of writing.…
knowing how to define pornography, we are apt simply to throw up our hands in frustration and…
Question 7. 7. Which statement might be used to argue that pornography should be more tightly regulated? (Points : 1)…
When discussing the “XXX” industry, otherwise known as pornography or the adult film industry, people tend to discuss it in hushed tones, or rather not discuss it much at all. When it comes to sex in general, America generally is uncomfortable talking about sex and topics related to it. It should come as no surprise that the porn industry is treated in a similar fashion. Pornography, according to Sullivan, was considered “sexually 'explicit' writings, still or motion pictures and similar products designed to be sexually arousing,” (Sullivan, 2012, pg.321).…
“Forms of expression that are not obscene and that do not aid independently illegal conduct constitute protected under the First Amendment (Rutherglen).” The pornography that Professor Smut showed in class was obscene, that’s why the First Amendment doesn 't protect him. “The belief that pornography diminishes equal opportunities for women in employment, education, and politics and encourages men to treat women as second-class citizens (Baron 364).” City councils and courts have accepted that controversy with very little supporting evidence. An experiential study of the relationship between pornography and gender equality has significant policy and judicial effects. Obscene is offensive or disgusting by accepted standards of morality and decency.…
The viewing of pornography on college campuses is commonly associated with social disorganization, for example, breakdown of norms that discourage such behavior. Parents, peers, professors, and administrators are the ones who often tend to be blamed for social disorganization. I want to counter that point by saying that it is in fact social organization, for example, the foundation of certain norms and organizations, which encourage the viewing of pornography. The social organization of students into college life gives birth to a culture of permissiveness that leaves different parts of college life awash with the viewing of pornography. In this paper I ask the question: Why is the viewing of pornography pervasive among college students? I attempt to answer this question in the way students’ life is organized. To support this thesis, I offer the following four arguments. First, the involvement with certain groups on a college campus includes the viewing of pornography. Second, these different groups/organizations’ permissive attitude toward sex leads to pornographic viewing. Third, these different organizations partake in group activities, which promote group norms that include the viewing of pornography. Fourth, students to partake in these activities at a high rate to form friendship and have a sense of belonging that these different organizations offer.…
When we think of pornography we usually think of videos that are explicit and graphic in a sexual nature and magazines such as Hustler and Playboy. It also can be found in paintings, sculptures, photos, drawings and the Internet. It can even be performed in a live venue, in front of a live audience. Pornography is a very controversial topic and there are many other factors that contribute to this.…
several reasons for being wary of the censorship of pornography, I will discuss only two…
Pornography remains one of the most controversial and confusing areas that the First Amendment contains. Supreme Court justices have struggled through years trying to define what it really is by society standards, but it still remains indefinable. People argue whether pornography should be protected by the First Amendment or not, due to its inflicting content and views that feminists have towards it. Among many people are Susan Jacoby, a journalist that is known for her feminist writings, and Susan Brownmiller, an author and a graduate of Cornell University. They both discuss what we should be allowed to say and do, and what we should do regarding pornographic material.…
These days it seems that one cannot surf the web without stumbling across inappropriate content. The World Wide Web is saturated with pornography and it appears everywhere from annoying pop up banners to entire websites devoted to the subject. Pornography is presented through various medii, mostly as pictures and movie clips and because media plays such vital role in how we perceive things and how we form our opinion, I believe that most find it offensive and inappropriate. Despite the fact that statistically pornography is the number one searched topic on the web, the advertisements and banners usually sway the viewers into ,either of two directions. While most respond with disgust, resentment and annoyance, there are some who will be captivated by the luring exposed divas in these ads and actually go to the advertised websites. In my opinion, when people desire to look at porn, they will search for it, and pop up banners are simply distracting and irritating if searching for a business related information or a school project. How does the media influence our decisions? With the emergence of internet and a whole culture of porn, parents have some choices to make as to how to protect and educate their kids about safety on the web. must be Parents now have to monitor their kids activity online and teach them to use caution when talking to strangers in chat rooms. Others may need to worry about…
This report challenges the question of whether pornography is morally ethical or unethical and how society views it today. There were three key ethical theories used to related and cross-examine to see and understand the different views of pornography and how each ethical theory provides a different reasoning behind it. Whether pornography is ethical or unethical in society, this research paper provides you with concrete examples of why our society feels the way they do about pornography and what has influenced those decisions. Pornography can be depicted into so many different forms of sexual arousal and this is the basis for examining what is right or wrong within our society. There are many different factors that play important roles for example culture.…