Preview

The Definition of Ethics and the Foundation of Moral Development

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Definition of Ethics and the Foundation of Moral Development
LS 312 Ethics and the Legal Environment
Unit 2 Assignment
The Definition of Ethics and the Foundation of Moral Development
Dianne Wing
Kaplan University
December 18, 2012

THE DEFINITION OF ETHICS AND THE FOUNDATION OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT
Ethics
Ethics is simply defined as a set of principles of right conduct, the motivation based on ideas of right and wrong. It is also the study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by a person (moral philosophy). Ethics also speaks to the rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession as in medical or business ethics (Free Dictionary, 2012).
The Theorist
John Rawls 1921-2002 John Rawls was an American political philosopher in the liberal tradition. His theory of justice as fairness envisions a culture of free citizens with equal basic rights acting together in a democratic economic system. His description of political liberalism speaks to the legitimate use of political power in a democracy, intending to show how lasting unity may be accomplished despite the diversity of worldviews that free institutions tolerate. His work on the law of people extends these theories to liberal foreign policy, with the purpose of showing how a peaceful and tolerant international order might be achievable (Wenar, 2012). John Rawls is recognized as being among the most important political philosophers of the late twentieth century. He is best known for his theory of Justice as Fairness that advances principles of justice necessary to govern a modern social order and offers a hypothetical variation on the social contract theory, in which rational representatives make social decisions from behind a "veil of ignorance" that prevents prior knowledge of what status they will hold. According to Rawls, this method would produce a society where individual freedoms are maximized for all and social inequality is justifiable only under conditions that would be



References: Johnson, D. (2012) Hostess Failure Not Union 's Fault, Truth-Out, http://truth- out.org/opinion/item/12928-hostess-failure-not-unions-fault Kaplan e-Guide (2012) The Kaplan e-Guide to Ethics and the Legal Environment, Chapter 2, p. 1-7 Kemerling, Garth. (Dec. 30, 2011). John Rawls, Philosophy Pages (photo included). http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/r.htm#rawl Olen, H. (2012) Who Killed Hostess Brands and Twinkies? FORBES, http://news.yahoo.com/hostess-executives-earnings-revealed-blame-bakery- workers-company-210214635.html Pauyo, J. (2012) Why people/organizations act ethically; 12 Manage, http://www.12manage.com/forum.asp?TB=i_er&S=46 The Free Dictionary (2012) Ethics, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ethics Wenar, Leif, "John Rawls", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/rawls/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Last Detroit Summary

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have always thought myself to be mindful of my country’s socio-political climate and the connotations of each social class, it is something that I am passionate about, but Mr. Bardecki’s mention of John Rawls was my first introduction to the theory of justice as fairness. From the article “John Rawls and the Liberal Theory of Society” this was one of Rawls’ bold, powerful statements that struck me the most: “A just society is a society that if you knew everything about it, you’d be willing to enter it in a random place.” I believe that this concisely states John Rawls’ philosophy of equal rights, opportunity, and promotion of the least advantaged members of society. In the aforementioned quote, Rawls suggests that for a society to be truly fair, there would be no discrimination between the classes. To simplify, you would not care whether you were to be put into the upper class or the lower class of a society because you would have the same opportunities and benefits in both.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Rawls’ A Theory on Justice establishes standards by which we may evaluate justice in society. In assessing the United States in light of the Rawlsian principles of social justice, it is evident that America falls short of these standards, and yet this discord tolerated in America. While this incongruity does in fact affect the lives of many Americans, particularly the underpriviledged, in practice very little is done to lessen inequality so as to achieve the Rawlsian ideal of social justice in America.…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A just society should be one that leads to progression and protects an individual's rights and freedoms. In this paper I will take Rawls position that we would create a more just society by creating a minimum standard of living for everyone. One of the main points presented in Nozick’s theory is that redistribution is wrong because it is unjust to steal resources that were justly earned from one person and to give it to someone else. In principle Nozick is correct that redistribution is unjust in the sense that we are taking resources from one person to give to another, however, Nozick’s view doesn’t account for the fact that people aren’t born with equal opportunity so without redistribution it results in a hierarchy that keeps increasing.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robert Nozick and John Rawls

    • 2474 Words
    • 10 Pages

    John Rawls’ “original position” is a hypothetical situation in which rational parties make social decisions under a veil of ignorance, so as to prevent attributing advantages to one party over another. Rawls’ difference principle states that inequalities among humans are to be redistributed equally to benefit all. Robert Nozick disagrees with John Rawls’s “original position” and “difference principle.” Nozick believes that historical principles are required in certain moral situations and notes that their existence is impossible if individuals deal under Rawls’s “veil of ignorance.” With regards to the difference principle, Nozick argues that the rich may not wish to fully cooperate with the poor in redistributing wealth, for their natural endowments break no laws. He also states that Rawls’ difference principle is morally arbitrary in the notion of the rich wanting to help the poor.…

    • 2474 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls Veil Of Ignorance

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is also important to cite Rawls’s conception of the ‘Veil of Ignorance’, which is part of Rawls earlier work. As Ben Rogers point out whilst analysing Rawls’s work, ‘The veil of ignorance is meant to ensure that our views on justice are not distorted by our own interests’ (…). In the case of the Iranian Revolution, it would have been valued if the Islamists would have adopted the veil of ignorance when writing the constitution. As Rawls’s points out, by taking away the elements that makes up a person’s identity, such as ethnicity and religion, the veil of ignorance can lead to principles that ‘specify the kinds of social cooperation that can be entered into and the forms of government that can be established’ (…). Despite the argument of…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The California Dream

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As I began reading Rawl’s essay, I found it interesting how the world views the…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rawls himself admits as much. While he argues that he is ‘sufficiently’ Kantian, it is unclear whether he succeeds in this endeavor. At the very least, since Kantian notions like autonomy are not a matter of degree but actuality, i.e. all action is either autonomous or it is not, then I hold that Rawls would be better served to drop the Kantian connection altogether, which he actually did in his later writings by introducing a strictly political account of justice as fairness based on an overlapping…

    • 4685 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens United

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To illustrate the rights violation of the concepts of regulations and restrictions, we can turn to John Rawls theory of political equality. Rawls argues that rules and regulations need to be in place in order for everyone to have a fair and equal scheme of liberties. What Rawls means by this, is that not one person will have more of a liberty than another person. For example, the regulation of campaign contribution limited to 2,500 dollars a person. This is a regulation because it does not infringe on our liberty for political expression, but it does regulate and set rules in how to go about this type of liberty.This is important because with the regulation of 2500 dollars, then a person with more money can not give more money to influence a campaign then a person who has less money. However, a restriction does infringe of basic liberties such as prohibitions on certain language The content of political expression can be restricted. For example, a nation has an instance in which the constitution is undermined by a certain type of speech, then it can be restricted…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawl's Justice Is Fairness

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Rawls never claimed to know the only way to start a society, but he did suggest a very sound and fair way to do so. He based his just scenario on two principles of justice. His first principle of justice was that everyone should have the same rights as others. His following policy decision was that in the event of any inequalities, they should be to the benefit to everybody, and available to all people in the society. This original Rawl's approach to justice has been highly revered by philosophers to this day. This is mostly because Rawl's has thought up one of the fairest Utopia since the days of Socrates. This is not an easy of a task as it sounds. Though when analyzed by even the most naïve philosophers, it seems that Rawl's scenario base of principles are pretty obvious and simple. Maybe because some of these same principles can be found in present day society. The United States tries to pride itself in maintaining these two principles at all costs. In some countries even regarding these principles as fair can cause you to go away for a very long time. The most commonly known to the term "political prisoner" is Gedhun Choekyi…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls believes it is in the participants best interest to use maximin reasoning, how the maximin works is by “compare alternatives by the worst possible outcome under each alternative, and we should choose one which maximize the utility of the worst outcome.” (http://tiseda.sakura.ne.jp/works/maximin.html) Rawls believes his two principles of justice work as it makes all in society cooperate, according to the maximin rule the society should be designed in a way as to maximise the position of those in society which will be worse off in said society, “This means maximizing the minimum, or choosing the option where the worst possible outcome is better than the worst possible outcomes in the other options.”…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Rawls is perhaps the most significant intellectual in philosophical ethics to have written in the past hundred years. It is nearly impossible to address ethics in contemporary philosophy without saying something about John Rawls. Central to his theory of justice are the concepts of fairness and equality from behind what he terms a "veil of ignorance".…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics