Preview

The Fourth Observation: Precedent Guilty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fourth Observation: Precedent Guilty
The fourth observation is the benefit of pleading guilty instead of going to trial. As I have stated before all of the defendants I observed all pleaded guilty and this made it difficult to actually describe how a trial of minor traffic offence is conducted. The first benefit of pleading guilty is the person’s socio-economic status. In the courtroom mostly all of the individuals were middle-class wearing casual attire but a few that were not dressed appropriately for court. In the adversary system the job of the lawyer is to represent their client effectively and this ensures that they get paid for their services. In reality not everyone can afford a lawyer and in minor traffic offences the presence of a lawyer is not mandatory but can help …show more content…
This brings me to the second benefit which is most of the individuals who receive tickets do not have enough evidence to present their case. If there is definitely something wrong with your ticket this makes it easier to present in court but most of the people are aware of their actions when committing traffic violations. The third benefit of pleading guilty knows that your fine or charges are going to be reduced and going to trial and losing the case would result in no reduction of charges. One of the theories in the reading was the truth deficit which allows the defendant to speak in his/her defence and this ensures that the truth will always emerge in court. But the adversary system has moved away from this approach and the truth has become a by-product that will not always be accurately portrayed in court. The benefit of civil cases is the truth will always be the first priority and the defendant has a credible witness. For this reason, there are multiple reasons why a person will plead guilty and the legal system permits this approach to make the defendant realize their unlawful actions maintain …show more content…
Since I have visited the courthouse before I was aware that the court session will not be like the one displayed on television shows and movies. The courtroom is a formal setting where the only priority is the case and not to socialize. But I noticed the atmosphere inside the courtroom was quiet and once people stepped out they were more openly communicating and laughing. Another expectation before arriving at the courtroom was the judge would be nice and pleasant and will respect the defendant and make them feel comfortable. But I observed the judge was behaved in the opposite manner he was rude and hostile which collaborates with our readings of judge portraying bias and unprofessional behaviour. I was also expecting to see at least one case where the defendant pleads not guilty but I was surprised that everyone pleaded guilty. In reality the court sessions are quick and efficient and often overcrowded which is often the case in traffic violation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    2. For defense attorneys a “successful” case often means a reduction in sentence via a plea bargain, not…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the important roles a judge, a criminal prosecutor, and a criminal defense attorney will carry out is called, a “courtroom work group”. The courtroom work group interact on a daily basis by these three entities joining together to converse over matters such as if the case has probable cause to convict the offender or whether or not if there is enough evidence to go forward with a criminal trial. Normally, the prosecutor will try to persuade the defense that they do not have a case or try to talk the defense into a guilty plea or possible bail. In other words, anything they can do to speed up the process with various types of negotiations. The judge has to remain ethical and fair to see both sides of the prosecution and defense to determine if the negotiations are valid enough to go through with. Even though the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney are the main officials of the courtroom work group, we cannot forget about other members that play a part as well. The minor (respectfully) members or other members that make up a courtroom work group are the court clerk, the bailiff, and the court reporter. The court clerk upholds all the records while the court reporter makes sure he/she transcribes the official proceedings. The bailiff helps to keep court order throughout a trial. Although I can understand how the main officers discuss the case and try to solve it without a trial, I feel that every case should be heard. The major problem with this though is time and money. In order for every offender to have a case without the prosecutor trying to convince the defense into something else, there would have to be a lot more courthouses with a lot more main officers. The only way this would ever happen is to hike up the taxes and no one wants their taxes to increase.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Falsely confessing to a guilty plea is another way in which wrongful convictions may be mete out. However, if a person is truly innocent, what would be so strong so as to compel them to plead guilty? One logical answer is that when the potential to be convicted of a crime exists and carries a mandatory sentence with it, it may be better to plead to a lesser crime, which may carry a lower sentence and allow for a conditional sentence. Stat on number of wrongful convictions. Even a single wrongful conviction is a travesty and injustice to the…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    So they then turn to plea bargaining as a way to deliver justice efficiently. (p. 61) The prosecutor 's office has the responsibility of trial preparation and also has to shoulder the costs that are associated with obtaining evidence and interviewing witnesses among other pretrial preparations. (p. 309) Therefore, the prosecutor will then select which case to take to trial and which to plead out. This is based on whether he thinks he has sufficient evidence to prove every element of the charge. Also, he might not have complete confidence in the witnesses ' testimony or there is a chance the victim might refuse to cooperate at the last minute. Prosecutors also use plea bargaining to reward a cooperating defendant. (Neubauer, 2002, p.…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Cases

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States court system runs smoothly due to plea bargaining because they push cases through without trial. Trials can take weeks and even months before they have a verdict. With ninety percent of cases being plea bargained it keeps court cases moving along. The United States court system is like a conveyer belt and plea bargaining is what keeps the conveyer belt moving so thing do not get backed up. Plea bargaining also benefits defendants by giving them a choice to plead guilty and take a lesser charge by giving up their right to a trial (Alschuler, 1968, p. 4). For those who the evidence clearly shows they are guilty they can chose a plea bargaining and get less time without wasting the court's time. Defendants who have families they need to support and are guilty of a crime can take a plea bargaining and can serve less time so they can get back to supporting their families sooner. Individuals can also give up their right to a trial by their peers in exchange for a guilty plea of a less serious offense or lesser charges making their criminal record better. They are minor first offenses where people can go without hiring a lawyer and instead accept a plea bargain and avoid going trial and paying for a lawyer. Many people make mistakes early in their life and plea bargains give those people a chance to reduce time served or charges by admitting to what they…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of plea bargaining can coerce “innocent defendants to plead guilty” (Guidorizzi, 2013, p. 197). Being arrested is a frightening experience for anyone. If an innocent person gets arrested and is told he can get a harder sentence if he risks going to trial; he may accept a bargain for a crime he did not commit. This comes from the fear of going to prison for even longer. Unfortunately this has happened and continues to happen. Criminologists suspect that “between 2 percent and 8 percent” of innocent individuals plead guilty. That means that at least forty-four thousand innocent individuals are behind bars and most from plea bargaining. An example is when Brian Banks was wrongfully convicted of rape and kidnapping “after accepting a plea bargain under the advisement of his original lawyer” (Rakoff, 2014). He served five years of that sentence. This can have long lasting negative effects for anyone that goes through this. Because plea bargaining has caused innocent people to go to prison, it is a negative practice and it should be…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all cases the criminals were career criminals who have been in and out of trouble for years and in all cases they plead guilty and received little or no jail time. While you might think this is good for the criminals and they should be happy about their sentences it is not good. These criminals suffer from many problems, are in some cases homeless, and they are in need of desperate help. They last place they want to be or should be is back on the streets. There are few variables that cause public defenders and prosecutors to come to the bargains that they do and a very big reason is that jails are overcrowded and can't handle the volume of people that commit crimes. So in that case if someone doesn't commit a very serious crime most often they will return to the streets within a couple of days. This is very unfair to the criminal, victim, and society. These people need help and by them going back onto the streets they are a liability to them selves and…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most Anglo-American courts actively discouraged guilty pleas and the procedure of “Plea bargaining emerged as a significant practice only after the American Civil War, and it generally met with strong disapproval on the part of the appellate courts” (Alschuler 211). Plea bargaining began to appear in court reports after the Civil War, which included the first such case, Swang v. State, in which the defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of gambling as was dismissed from eight other gambling charges (224 Alschuler). Such surveys conducted in the 1920’s revealed that an increased number of plea bargaining agreements may have caused some defendants to plead guilty, even though they could not have been convicted at trial. As the number of convictions by guilty plea increased during the time following the 1920’s, “both the percentage of convictions at trial and percentage of acquittals showed a sharp decline” (Alschuler 230). Records today indicate that approximately 90% to 95% of criminal convictions are reached through plea bargaining. While the prominent goal of our justice system is to provide justice for all, justice is difficult to accomplish, for there are many various factors that contribute to crime, such as educational, social, and psychopathological factors, which must be considered to provide justice…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do believe that there are instances where plea bargaining can be an effective tool in the criminal justice system, however, as it stands, the overuse of the plea bargain by prosecutors has diminished it’s potential worth as a true bargaining tool by their flagrant daily misuse. While it is understood that the case load for the courts is overwhelmed and an alternative method of securing some form of justice is needed to alleviate the overrun system, the use of the plea bargain to alleviate the overcrowded courts is not completely acceptable.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargaining not only serves a purpose in our criminal justice system; it has become a vital part of it. The significance of plea bargaining can be overlooked because of the implications of the wording. The term “plea bargain” sometimes implies a misnomer in the fact that it leads one to believe those who accept a plea bargain are getting off easy which in many cases is not true. In many cases, plea bargains prove to be the most efficient method of invoking justice on criminals (Bohm & Haley, 2011).…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Without question, plea bargains benefit many defendants who have committed crimes and receive lighter sentences than they might after trial. It also limits cases that require considerable time and expense in court.” (Oppel, 2011) Victims feel as though this gives them less jail time which in turn means that they will be back out on the streets sooner to resume committing these crimes again. Victims fear for their lives and the lives of their family as well because they feel as though there may be some retaliation brought to them because they file charges against…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time at which plea bargaining began in the United States isn’t the only controversy surrounding this important issue. Some of the other problems surrounding plea bargaining in the United States are false confessions, in which an otherwise innocent offender pleads guilty to a crime he or she did not commit, simply to avoid the possibility of being found guilty at trial. It is hard to understand why an individual would even consider doing that, however some defendants feel that they will be better off by just admitting to the crime, even when they had nothing at all to do with…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics