Preview

The Great Compromise: The Most Important Debates In American History

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Great Compromise: The Most Important Debates In American History
The Great Compromise
The Great Compromise was a debate during the Constitution Convention on determining on how many representatives of each state should have under the new governments law making branch. This is known as being one of the most important debates in American history because of the foundation it laid for what our legislative government is today. Originally, Congress would be seen as a 1 chamber with only a certain number of representatives per state. The debate was how many representatives should each state have and with this came up 2 plans. Delegates from the larger states came up and supported the Virginia plan which called for different number of representatives per state based on population. Delegates from smaller


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before we knew it as the United States Constitution, we all knew it as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was just too weak as in: each state had one vote in Congress, there was no executive branch to enforce laws passed by Congress, there was no national court system, and etc… Before it could be ratified there was great concern between the delegates that were present at the convention. The main concern they had was the type of legislature. The representatives of larger states wanted the seats in the legislature to be determined by the size of the state. The representatives from the smaller states wanted to have equal representation in Congress. They negotiated on this situation by allowing a bicameral legislature,…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitutional Convention delegates were from a variety of different backgrounds and different political views. They held a debate about how many representatives would be acceptable for each state to have. The states with a large population preferred the Virginia Plan. This plan allows for each state to have a different number of representatives based on the population. The states with a smaller population preferred the New Jersey Plan. The New Jersey Plan states that each state would have the same number of representatives. A delegate from Connecticut proposed a two-house legislature as a compromise. This compromise set the foundation for the Senate and a House of Representatives. The states with a smaller population favored the Senate…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The government’s inability to tax and raise an army, as well as their lack of central power, led to what became known as the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Founding Fathers met to fix the problems with the Articles, but ended up drafting the Constitution instead. During the convention, several different plans were discussed. The first was the Virginia Plan, written by James Madison, which suggested the existence of both an executive and legislative branch. The legislative branch was to have two houses of Congress, each with representation based on population. In contrast, the New Jersey Plan was to have a unicameral legislative branch with equal representation for each state. With the help of Benjamin Franklin, the Great Compromise was created, which combined the two plans. It called for three branches; including a legislative branch comprised of two houses. The Senate was to have equal representation from each state, while the…

    • 6730 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Structure

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue still was how congress would allot for its representatives given the numbers of constituents in each of the states; originally they attempted one for every thirty thousand which if initially ratified would have fell short of the necessary three-fourths (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). Direct representation Madison would point out during the attempt to find a solution is impossible, even a tiny state like Rhode island would find it difficult to be at every assembly, he insisted on a smaller select group (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). The one in every thirty thousand would be later changed to one in every forty thousand and would be adjusted every ten years as the population grew (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). This mathematical formula made little sense as Mr. Amar states “if the population grew from eight to nine million in a decade the house would be 200 delegates” which would negate the condition that there not be more than one for every fifty thousand (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). This section changed in 1910 the basis of representation was one for every 210,000 inhabitants, and it wasn’t till the 1930’s by the act of June 1929 that the house was restricted to 435 members, now they just continue to divide the population to meet the electoral quota (Corwin et al., 1978). The senate allocations are extremely less problematic provided by section 3 of article one it simply states there will be two senators for each state, and even the addition in the 17th amendment does not change much but adds the basis if there are any vacancy (Corwin et al.,…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter 8 of The Thirteen American Arguments, Howard Fineman discusses the tensions between local and national authority.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each state according to population got a number of representatives (each state had at least one representative), and two senators. This is what caused the big states v. small states issue. Why was this an issue? Well the large states obviously would have been happier with their representation in the House like, Virginia. “Representatives…shall be appointed…according to……

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder. The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. What could posses a person to do such a heinous crime when they have almost everything going for them? Almost does not count in the presidential elections. This was especially true with the Compromise of 1850. Two large faces in America at the time, John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster, had opposing views on what would be the ideal decision for the better good. The Compromise of 1850 included five bills passed to keep power balanced between slave and non-slave states following America's investment in new territory after the Mexican-American War.1 During the 1850s there were influential speeches spoken by both Calhoun and Webster, could the difference and need of power have led to Calhoun's death?…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The major compromises that were made at the Constitutional Convention were that both of the parties wanted to change the whole document instead of amending the articles. The issues that were settled at this time was creating the senate, and the house. The senate allowed represenation by state, and the house established repersentation by population. Most of the issues that remained unsettled were woman's rights and immigration.…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1786 Alexander Hamilton called for a Constitutional Convention to discuss the lack of a central government and to fix the Articles of Confederation. The colonies were told to send delegates to the convention. The 55 delegates met, they were composed of merchants, farmers, lawyers and crafters. They were supposed to fix the Articles of Confederation but they decided to create a whole new document and call it the Constitution. This new government would have three branches the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. They also designed a system of Checks and Balances that would make sure that no branch would become too strong. They also made the Constitution able to be changed if necessary. Not all the delegates were professional people they were…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if the American Civil War never happened? It could have if the Crittenden Compromise would have passed. The Crittenden Compromise was one of the last attempts to stop a war from happening in America. The Crittenden Compromise is one cause of the Civil War. It would have allowed the southern states to have slaves, and the northern to not. It also would have allowed the Confederates to maintain their beliefs in slavery being useful and right.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the presidentail election of 1860, Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln defeated the profoundly diverged Democratic Party consisting of Southern Democrat candidate John C. Breckinridge, Constitutional Union candidate John Bell and Northern Democrat candidate Stephen Douglas. Abraham during the Lincoln-Douglas Debate for U.S. Senate seat argued against the spread of slavery while Douglas argued that maintenance of each territory should have the right to decide for themselves to be pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Although Abraham loss the U.S. Senate seat, it brought national attention to the young Republican party which later paid off when Lincoln faced Douglas again in the Presidentail Debate where he gained success. Lincoln received only 40…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main causes of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 were great in number. The first was Abraham Lincoln claiming that Douglas was encouraging fears of amalgation of the races with enough success to drive thousands of people away from the Republican Party. The second was that Stephen A. Douglas was claiming that Lincoln was an abolitionist for saying that the American Declaration of Independence applied, in fact, to both blacks and whites. The third cause was Lincoln arguing that in his "House Divided" speech that Douglas was part of the conspiracy to nationalize slavery. Lincoln also expressed fear that the next Dred Scott decision would end up with Illinois as a slave state.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, the states were focused on different ideas that did or did not coincide with a central government or its distribution of power. As a result, delegates in both a big and smaller state came up with two different strategies, the Virginia and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan wanted the representation be based on population and the New Jersey Plan wanted equal representation for each state. With both plans being rejected, the Great Compromise was issued, allowing the Senate to deal with equal representation, while House took on the representation of the population…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cornwallis, commander of the British army, encouraged partisan warfare, losing support of the civilian population. After years of war and finally getting Cornwallis to surrender with the help of the English, the Articles of Confederation were written in 1777, which granted Congress certain powers and restrictions. The Articles of Confederation almost caused America to collapse, so the Constitutional Convention was held to fix the issues. At this meeting, James Madison suggested the Virginia plan, eliminating the Articles of Confederation and adding an executive branch, two houses of Congress, and representation determined by population. People who lived in small states didn’t like this plan, so Ben Franklin offered a compromise: a lower house, the House of Representatives, would be based on population and an upper house, the Senate, would be based on equal representation.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays