Preview

The Roles Of Himmler, Chamberlain, And Churchill

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Roles Of Himmler, Chamberlain, And Churchill
Himmler, Chamberlain, and Churchill, though they had different mindsets, they all played important roles during World War II. Neville Chamberlain was always concerned about his people and keeping the peace. He tried to avoid conflict with Adolf Hitler and Germany at all costs. Chamberlain still seemed to be focused on healing the wounds from WWI. Once Chamberlains failed attempts at peace came to an end, Winston Churchill took over read to go to war. On October 4 1943, Third Reich officer, Heinrich Luitpold Himmler presented a speech to the Schutzstaffel organization regarding the Jewish evacuation program. The object of the Schutzstaffel organization was to develop plans on how to kill Jews more efficiently. The positions were filled by …show more content…
Himmler was concerned about speaking publicly about the many events that occurred while he was a member of the SS. The object of his speech was to remind the SS members that what had be done should be considered as accomplishments. Himmler’s admits that one of his duties were to shoot comrades on June 30 1934, which became known as the Rohm Purge. The speech was also done out of fear, the Nazi state was in trouble since the Battle of Stalingrad had been lost and the Nazis couldn’t seem to gain headway in the war. Himmler’s mentality, along with much of the Nazi Party members, was fixated on the extermination of Jews for the benefit of the state. Many believed that if the Jews were given the opportunity, they would support allies. Himmler also begins to justify the actions of the Schutzstaffel organization by repeating that it was his duty to take the lives of Jews. “We have exterminated a bacterium because we do not want in the end to be infected by the bacterium and die of it…We had the moral right, we had the duty to our people, to destroy this people which wanted to destroy us.” Himmler himself, leader of the SS believed that the “evacuation plan,” was gruesome. As gruesome as he believed it was, the idea that it was his duty …show more content…
He believed in keeping his citizens happy and safe. His citizens, along with citizens from other countries would constantly write letters to him about their fear of war. Chamberlain wanted to avoid another war at all cost and was able to for a short while. Chamberlain believed and promoted peace, which is a major reason why he was in favor of the Munich Agreement. The agreement was the best possible choice because it was the most peaceful. Though it meant Hitler having his way and the German government in authority, as long as Hitler was satisfied, he believed there wouldn’t be a war. He truly believed that the Czechoslovakia would be fairly treated once the agreement settles with Hitler. He saw the agreement as an opportunity that would give the new state and its inhabitants, new life. Chamberlain was offended when he was accused of betraying Czechoslovakia. Great Britain lacked effective military training and equipment that wasn’t brought to light until threat of war arose. The Munich Agreement ultimately gave Hitler control of Czechoslovakia and within months, Britain declared war on Germany. Chamberlain lasted through eight months of World War II before he resigned from the government. Winston Churchill became the new Prime

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 - 1940. He signed the Munich Agreement in 1938. When Hitler continued his aggression on Poland, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland's independence, therefore Britain declared war on, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II. “On the Nazi invasion of Poland” speech was announced hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. He died of cancer after six months of leaving the premiership and was replaced by Winston Churchill. This speech was announced to show the cruelty of the Nazi government and to stop the Germans aggression…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument is the view that appeasement was the only realistic option because public opinion supported it and for Chamberlain to lead Britain to war would go against public favour. The First World War savaged Europe and Britain was hit very hard in terms of Human losses. Many families lost men within the family and left psychological scars nationwide. Chamberlain was therefore desperate to avoid another war on the continent at all costs. If Britain was to go to war they would have to rearm and build on their armed forces which had been neglected since world war one. However public opinion was that if Britain was rearming then they would be preparing for war, which was incredible unpopular. Evidence of this was in east Fulham by-election of 1933 the conservative who advocated rearmament turned a majority of 14,000 into a defeat by 5000 at the hands of his labour approach who supported disarmament. This illustrated the political affect that rearmament and policies that move towards War had which was a reason as to why Chamberlain saw appeasement as the only realistic option.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initially, Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King warmly supported British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasing German leader Adolf Hitler. When Chamberlain postponed war by sacrificing Czechoslovakia in the Munich crisis of September 1938, King thanked him publicly, and Canadians in general certainly agreed. Nevertheless, the shock of this crisis likely turned opinion towards accepting war to check the advance of Nazism. Only gradually did ongoing Nazi aggression alter this mood to the point where Canada was prepared to take part in another great war. King himself had no doubt that in a great war involving Britain, Canada could not stand aside.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Munich agreement encouraged Hitler to take more land and spread militarism. Neville Chamberlain should have stopped Hitler in his tracks, and gathered Allies to defend Poland, as well…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline of Wwii

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1938 - Hitler wanted to annex the Sudetenland, a portion of Czechoslovakia whose inhabitents were mostly German-speaking. On Sept. 29, Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain signed the Munich Pact, which gave Germany the Sudetenland. British Prime Minister Chamberlain justified the pact with the belief that appeasing Germany would prevent war.…

    • 3049 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herschel was the son of a family that was Jewish, Hitler sent them away to Poland where they lived in a make shift camp. This fueled an anger against the German’s. He set out to kill the German Ambassador to France. When he couldn’t find him, he set his target on the third official down, Secretary Ernst Vom Rath, who died just days after the altercation. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Chief of Propaganda used the assignation as a tool to convey the message that in essence “Every Jew wanted to harm the Reich and had to be dealt with in a harsh manner.” The Nazis were informed not to organize attacks but they were told not to discourage them. Angry hordes of people attacked anything that had to do with Jews in the dead of the night on November 9th and 10th 1938. Businesses were destroyed, Synagogues burned, and there was no safe haven as they were even attacked in their homes and on the roads in the city. After all the death and destruction was over and all of the broken glass lay upon the blood soaked streets. The Chief of Propaganda declared to the officials in Munich that the sole responsibility for the event deemed “Kristallnacht”,” the Night of Broken…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heinrich Himmler

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Heinrich Himmler (1900-1945) was the Reich Leader (Reichsführer) of the dreaded SS of the Nazi party from 1929 until 1945. Himmler presided over a vast ideological and bureaucratic empire that defined him for many -- both inside and outside the Third Reich -- as the second most powerful man in Germany during World War II. Given overall responsibility for the security of the Nazi empire, Himmler was the key and senior Nazi official responsible for conceiving and overseeing implementation of the so-called Final Solution, the Nazi plan to murder the Jews of Europe.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout World War Two, it was not only the Allied Leaders’ goal to defeat the Axis power, but to create a peaceful post war. They had to be cooperative, cunning, and diligent in order to accomplish their intents. The Allied Leaders were successful during World War Two based on their individual backgrounds, motivations, and the events they participated in. The “Big Three”, or Allied leaders, were Franklin Delano Roosevelt the U.S. president, Winston Churchill the Prime Minister of Great Britain, and Joseph Stalin the dictator of Russia, all with unique history.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prosperity and wealth of nations are closely linked with economic growth. Accelerating the development of economic growth in a sustained way is therefore one of the most important issues in economics. Economists have long used a variety of approaches to shed light on why some countries experience faster growth than others. In the vast amount of literature on the subject there are three schools that stand out in particular. First, there is a group of scholars that places geographical factors such as climate, transport cost and natural resources as the main explanatory factors. Recent writings by Jared Diamond and Jeffery Sachs are important contributions in this paradigm (Diamond, 1997; Sachs, 2001). Second, there is a faction that emphasizes international trade as a key to economic growth. Important contributions to this market-integration view have been presented in the works of Frankel & Romer (1999) and Dollar & Kraay (2004). Finally, there is a third group focusing on the explanatory power that institutions veil in this matter. This paper will follow in this tradition, as there seems to bee an increasingly pervasive concurrence among economists studying the phenomena that the development and quality of the institutional environment holds the key to prevailing patterns of sustained growth and prosperity around the world. Rich countries are those with sustained rule of law and property rights, effective policies towards private enterprises and competition, the political system is stabile and effective, companies enjoys easy access to financing and superior tax regimes and there is a well functioning…

    • 6156 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Second Great Awakening

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the thirty year span between 1830 and 1860, the Second Great Awakening did much to change the modern American mind by sparking the abolitionist movement, empowering women (in their domestic sphere) and forming the cult of domesticity, partially fixing the corrupt government through the temperance movement, and in the creation of many utopian societies by radical religious populations. Puritanism was kicked to the side when Evangelicalism took root. This religious renaissance was absolutely more optimistic than worship from the past; sin was no longer an inevitable part of your being. Rather, you could find salvation through yourself, so long as you avoided or repented your sin.3…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The representatives in the conference decided to give Hitler what he wanted. He felt that most Europeans would be happy they wouldn’t have to fight a war, though Czechoslovakia wouldn’t be happy because they had to give away their land.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Feminism and Christianity

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages

    An issue I have identified in our culture deals with the effects that the practice of Western Christianity has on women. Sexism is – or a misogynistic way of thinking – is a product of Christianity. In today’s world the perpetuation of traditional Christianity enforces and upholds ideals that are detrimental to the progression of sexual equality.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays