Rural schools struggle sometimes because they must compete unfairly with larger schools for state funding. In addition several policies use a minimum number of students or per- pupil basis to determine the funding available to the school. Unfortunately this can hurt smaller schools. However, there are some specific grants designed to help small schools. It is unfair to say rural schools are not as up to date as larger schools just because they are smaller. Rural schools have a better teacher student relationship. They often have a class size of ten to fifteen compared to a large school class size of thirty. Sometimes in larger classes students are overlooked and do not receive individual help if they need it. Students, teachers, and administration all have better relationships in a small school and most of the time truly care about the student’s education rather than the paycheck they receive. According to education.com, morale in students tends to be higher in a smaller school, and students often enjoy school more and have less disciplinary problems. Small schools also have the advantage of more easily being able to arrange field trips, parent-teacher conferences, and assembly programs. Another advantage of a rural school is more community and parental involvement in school activities. Smaller schools can be good or bad, but so can a larger school. Both type of schools have their problems. Large schools face more disciplinary problems, and not being able to help each student on a more personal level ,and small schools may not have the AP courses or as many athletic teams and clubs. There is no guarantee a smaller or larger school is better, but the government can do several things to make sure the children of America receive a good education. To improve education the government needs to ensure rural schools and districts have fair chances to receive
Rural schools struggle sometimes because they must compete unfairly with larger schools for state funding. In addition several policies use a minimum number of students or per- pupil basis to determine the funding available to the school. Unfortunately this can hurt smaller schools. However, there are some specific grants designed to help small schools. It is unfair to say rural schools are not as up to date as larger schools just because they are smaller. Rural schools have a better teacher student relationship. They often have a class size of ten to fifteen compared to a large school class size of thirty. Sometimes in larger classes students are overlooked and do not receive individual help if they need it. Students, teachers, and administration all have better relationships in a small school and most of the time truly care about the student’s education rather than the paycheck they receive. According to education.com, morale in students tends to be higher in a smaller school, and students often enjoy school more and have less disciplinary problems. Small schools also have the advantage of more easily being able to arrange field trips, parent-teacher conferences, and assembly programs. Another advantage of a rural school is more community and parental involvement in school activities. Smaller schools can be good or bad, but so can a larger school. Both type of schools have their problems. Large schools face more disciplinary problems, and not being able to help each student on a more personal level ,and small schools may not have the AP courses or as many athletic teams and clubs. There is no guarantee a smaller or larger school is better, but the government can do several things to make sure the children of America receive a good education. To improve education the government needs to ensure rural schools and districts have fair chances to receive