Preview

The Soft Drink Industry

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Soft Drink Industry
The soft drink industry is highly competitive. Characteristics of the industry include slow growth and maturity, a phase during which weak companies are weeded out of the market by the strongest corporations. In order to stay competitive, soft drink companies must be able to offer their product at a low price. A price that can at least match (or preferably, beat) a competitor’s price will allow that product to enter into a consumer’s mental set of possible brands to purchase. Because the pop industry produces a fairly standardized product, competitors in the industry cannot entice the consumer to pay a premium price for its product over another firm. Therefore, the ability to produce soda at a low cost to the company is an extremely important determinant of success.
Secondly, the firm’s brand of soda must be available for consumers to purchase easily. This means that the brand must be on the shelves of stores where most consumers shop for beverages, namely, large grocery stores. Although other channels of distribution are available, once again it is important for the brand to enter into a consumer’s mental set of possible brands to purchase. The fact that there are no switching costs associated with pop
. . .
As already discussed, the trends towards consolidation of the grocery store industry and consumers increasingly seeking a one stop shopping experience is the largest threat to NBC. As well as being able to compete price-wise, National Beverage Corporation is also well equipped to produce quality beverages. However, NBC may not be able to capitalize on this opportunity given its weakness in mainstream distribution channels. According to its 10K, it competes by “appealing to the ‘quality-price’ sensitivity factor of the family consumer.
Of the two aforementioned keys to success in the pop industry, the National Beverage Corporation possesses strengths in one area but may be vulnerable to threats in the other.
Overall, in terms of environmental threats

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Having said that, there is still a point where price is not the issue but taste. Some people swear by the taste in this loyal brand market. These two corporations have concentrated on cultivating brand management through applicable advertising, marketing campaigns. According to Bloomberg BusinessWeek, “Coca-Cola remains the best globally recognized brand across all industries for ages, while PepsiCo’s brand ranked number 26 in year 2008.” PepsiCo has been able differentiate itself from competitors by tapping into other markets like chips and healthy alternative foods. While PepsiCo is known for their soda, their expansion is clear in showing there is a need for other things being non-soda. The time for vitality comes with diversification because there are true signs of a shift in consumption. The decrease in soda consumption raises PepsiCo. has positioned it to continue to remain profitable for its shareholders.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marketing Plan for Kickstart

    • 3527 Words
    • 15 Pages

    PepsiCo has world renown brand name, a reputation for solid brands and a deep and wide product line in the international and domestic markets. (Simon & Sullivan, 1993). With revenue of more than $66.5 billion, PepsiCo is a world-wide leader in the beverage industry (Bryson York, 2012; Watling, 1992). According to its annual report, the international brand, innovative capabilities, and strong distribution network define PepsiCo as a market leader and are its strengths (www.pepsico.com; Valentin, 2001). One of the strength identified for PepsiCo is its franchise system (www.pepsico.com). A consistent brand and advertising campaign coupled with a consistent marketing strategy for promoting its brands is also a strength. PepsiCo further has a strong global presence as it sponsors major sporting events (www.pepsico.com). It also has a focus on one of the most important customer trends, i.e., customer satisfaction (Finch, 2012; Valentin, 2001). PepsiCo is ahead of some of its main competitors, for instance Coca-Cola, on both the…

    • 3527 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cadbury Crush Case

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Exhibit 5, from 1985-1989, Orange crushes’ market share decreased from 22% (1985) to 8% (1989), this data shows that prior to the entrance of Coca Cola’s Slice and Pepsi’s Minute Maid, Orange Crush had more of the market share which at the time, they were positioned toward groups between the ages of 13-40. Since 1985, Crush repositioned itself to target individuals between the ages of 12-17. Appendix D shows that Pepsi Co. and Minute Maid entered the market with their own orange soda brands capturing a large portion of the orange soda market. These new juggernaut competitors reduced Crush’s market share consistently each year by positioning themselves in the 15-30 year old market. Initially, we thought it would be wise for Crush to revert back to its’ original target market, however with the emergence of Pepsi Co.’s Slice and Coca Cola’s Minute Maid into the market, and the fact that both brands are targeting individuals roughly between the ages of 15-30 (Crushes’ previous target market) (Exhibit 8), we believe it would be best for Crush to make an adjustment to their current positioning strategy. Shifting from their current age range (teens 12-17)(Exhibit 13) to younger children between the ages of 6-16 would tap into a market segment not currently being pursued by the new dominant Orange Soda companies. This shift would differentiate Crush even further from their competition, and as a result lead to more market share capture potential and competitive advantage due to the fact that they will be the first major orange soda brand to enter into this new target market. Secondly, the alignment with a younger age bracket…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Industry Analysis Csd

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The industry of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) is highly concentrated. The three major companies, Coca Cola, PepsiCo, and Cadbury Schweppes accounted in 1998 for more than 90% of market share by case volume –Exhibit 1-.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our competitors will be large producers of soft drinks such as Coca-Cola with Minute Maid products and PepsiCo with Tropicana products. The Coca-Cola Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc hold respectively 13.1% and 6.4% of the fruits juices market. Coca-Cola is the world’s biggest soft drink company with more than 500 brands, including 17 brands that produce more than a billion dollars in income (Slcher, 2015). PepsiCo cl has 22 brands that create more than a billion dollars in income. Both organizations spend tremendous measures of cash on advancement, publicizing and advertising, and on fortifying their transportation system. According to Grewal and Levy, since 2010 Coca-Cola and its packaging partners have put more than $50 billion in new offices, dispersion framework, gear, and retail client enactments. PepsiCo spent in 2013 about 5.9% of its net income on promoting and showcasing (Grewal & Levy, 2010). Both organizations have wide geographic visibility around the country and internationally. Thus, LaMarquise will be threatening companies such as Sunmet, Tree Top, etc. which are our direct competitors in the market of concentrated fruit juices. So, through our strategy, we show our product as unique and different from other companies’ product (Bailey,…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Pepper Snapple is a smaller competitor to Coca-Cola. However, Pepsico is Coca-Cola’s rival competitor due to its relative size. Both have global recognized brands that compete in product differentiation instead of pricing. For instance, a 12-ounce can of Coke is usually priced similar to a 12-ounce can of Pepsi. Nonetheless, Coke attempted to change the taste of its product in the 1980s (i.e., product differentiation). Unfortunately, the New Coke was rejected by the public and reintroduced the original Coke as Coke Classic. Finally, due to the recent decrease in buyer demand, there has been an increase in competitive rivalry between the two brands. As a result, rivalry among competing sellers has…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elasticity of Pepsi

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The product selected from PepsiCo and analyzed for income and price elasticity is Pepsi. Pepsi is a product of PBNA. PBNA also includes Mountain Dew, Sierra Mist, Tropicana, SoBe and Aquafina. “PBNA manufactures and sells concentrate for some of these brands to licensed bottlers, who sell the branded products to independent distributors and retailers” (Pepsico, 2008). Some of the major competitors for PepsiCo are Bacardi Limited, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Heineken N.V., Nestle S.A., Ocean Spray, Red Bull, and Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc (Marketline, 2008). In this paper Pepsi’s price elasticity will be determined as well as the income elasticity of its customers. These calculations will be used to predict future revenue increases for the company.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is enormous. In 2000, more Americans drank soft drinks than water. The production and distribution of soft drinks involve concentrate producers (basic flavors), bottlers (add sweetener and carbonated water), and retailers. Of all the retailers available for distribution to customers, grocery stores and supermarkets account for about 31% of sales. There are three major competitors in the soft drink market (Coca-Cola, 44.1%; Pepsi-Cola, 31.4%; Dr Pepper/Seven Up, 14.7%). Each competitor spends a lot of money on advertising their brand through promotions, and consumer price discounting. Concentrate producers and bottlers usually share advertising costs because bottlers can target markets locally while producers focus on the bigger picture.…

    • 3374 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    drink industry. In 1993, CPs earned 29% pretax profits on their sales, while bottlers earned 9% profits on their…

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This report provides an analysis and evaluation of the Marketing Strategy of PepsiCo. Methodsof analysis include Market Segmentation, Market Targeting, Market Positioning, as well as theMarketing Mix of PepsiCo.The research draws attention to the Market Segmentation of PepsiCo. While the soft drink industry has probably the widest and deepest customer base in the world, Pepsi did not use themajority fallacy to market their product. Instead, Pepsi prefers to segment itself as the beveragechoice of the ³New Generation´, Generation Next, or just as the ³Pepsi Generation´. These…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUS ETHICS

    • 1323 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This research examines the Soda Industry, an industry that evolved from scientists experimenting with water and carbon dioxide to formulate carbonated water in 1772. Joseph Priestley is nickname the father of soft drinks for his experiments on gas obtained from fermenting vats of a brewery. This tasty combination was the basis for an industry that would become lucrative over a period of decades. The soda industry has two major manufacturing systems; 1.flavoring syrup and concentrate manufacturing and 2.soft drink manufacturing. These two components combined together and introduced soft drinks to the market. This industry also has three main players; Coca Cola, PepsiCo, and Cadbury Schweppes, but for years the industry was centered on the struggle between Coke and Pepsi. Since the fight between the two has settled down, the industry has begun to depend on new flavors by relying on noncarbonated beverages for growth, profits, and to offer consumers healthier alternatives.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soft Drink Industry

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A soft drink is a non-alcoholic beverage typically containing water often carbonated water and a flavoring agent. Many of these beverages are sweetened by the addition of sugar or high fructose They may also contain ingredients such as caffeine and fruit juice.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics