This film was very interesting and helpful because in my earth science class I am giving a group presentation of Hydro-fracking, and although I discovered in my research how harmful it can be, seeing personal accounts of it gave me a better feel on the subject. I think we need to come up with a better way to get natural gas out rock because injecting chemical fluid into the ground is too risky pertaining to our water supply. After all, we need water to survive. I agree that it is a problem that we are depending on what one legislature calls "foreign oil and terrorism," but I would rather keep depending on these resources then polluting our water supply and turning American land into nasty dumps. From this film and the group project I participated in for class, I have learned that our water can be easily contaminated. Fracking needs to be a careful process that should be done nowhere near major water sources are located.…
In my opinion, the theme of the movie is to unveil the human destruction due to technology that been overused. In is clear…
Is there any enlightenment in the film? Or are you walking away with any thoughts in a better way inspired by the film?…
According to Noriko T. Reider, this film “became the highest-grossing film of all time in Japan and it won many awards, including a 2003 Academy Award for Best Animated Feature Film” and made Miyazaki famous around the world (2005, P.4). In this film, his point about the environmentalism has changed that is not strong like the early works. He becomes more neutral with the relationship between people and environment. However, he still wants to warn people to focus on this problem but in a more polite way.…
Does our society truly understand how important our trees are, and do we have any idea of how bad off we will be once they are gone? How close to complete deforestation are we with the world’s population increasingly on the rise, and why market this film to children instead of making a public announcement of the severity of the issue? The film showed the quality of air being controlled by the mayor, which is the same in our world; the government controls what goes and what does not. So why not put a stop to it? Just as it was in the movie is the same in out reality it is all about the all mighty dollar. To produce a movie of this caliber and to make it geared toward children is kind of mind twisting. Is this just a really good movie or does it have a hidden agenda? I would like to believe that we now realize just how much we have done to the earth and it is too late for us to fix, so we inform our children and put it in their hands. It is believed that behavior is learned, so unless we teach our children about the importance of our trees and recycling the human race could become extinct.…
The film presents the people as people who can’t think for themselves. They have been brain washed into believing the political parties propagandas and like the answer to question 1 everyone is homogenous, very bland, no individuality and boring.…
The documentary discusses the changed culture in which kids are growing up today, and the forces influencing this change. How seriously should we take this influence? Give at least three reasons to support your position.…
I truly loved this film and there really is nothing I can say I did not like. However, the only thing that I wish was introduced in the film was maybe websites of where we can go to learn more about it, or maybe even explaining recipes that we could begin the change immediately. After watching this film I want to run to the grocery store and buy this food. The only thing is I can see myself getting overwhelmed and not knowing exactly what to purchase in order to create an ideal menu for the week. However, I will do my own research and look into this as I truthfully want to begin the change immediately.…
Therefore, I strongly believe that we watched this movie to learn from the lessons that it has…
Secondly, the World Trade Center, one could have not even come to terms with those two beautiful building coming down the way they did. That's because they should have not! The film gives…
It doesn't mention how the fast food industry eliminated the use of hydrogenated vegetable oil, almost completely eliminating trans fat from fast food. It has a scene comparing the resources used by a free range cow farmer who has about 20 cows versus an industrial slaughterhouse that processes thousands -- failing to mention that if the free range farmer produced cows on the same scale he would use 4x to 10x the resources for the same output. The movie takes an ill-advised stance against genetically modified food (google Norman Borlaugh). It makes several self-defeating arguments (like arguing that our industrially-produced food is infected and resource-intensive and that we should pay more to eat organic -- which is actually much more resource intensive and more…
Although the movie seemed to stretch the scientific "evidence" to match their viewpoint, a few enlightening points were made that will affect my own sense of self-awareness and ultimately how I interact with and motivate people. Perhaps the most basic concept the movie tried to convey was the idea that human thought and emotion are actually only a self-serving perception of some "true reality."…
Without a doubt, it's a hugely compelling and thought provoking movie and it makes you ask very poignant questions about yourselves or anyone around. As we grow and get lost in the crowd we tend to keep away from the philosophy of life and seek only materialistic things, the money, the name, the prosperity while our purpose of existence and purpose of doing something still remains in question.…
I found this movie to be very entertaining, and I also thought it carried some valuable lessons. This movie made me realize how unfortunate some…
We live in a very visual world and imagery is very powerful because if you walk into a room with 15 different languages and show them a picture, there is universal understanding of its meaning (Racing Extinction, 2015). I believe society needs to do more than attempt to change the way people see logic with their minds because it’s also about making people change the way they see things intrinsically. It’s easy to forget about issues that don’t affect individuals directly, but you it isn’t easy to unsee groundbreaking art that affects you deeply as an individual. Many great movements of social and human progress are illuminated by art in an attempt to inspire social progress, which is what this film is attempting to do. Dr.Jane Goodall, founder of the Jane Goodall Institute and UN messenger of Peace is featured in the film suggesting that “in 200 years people will look back on this particular period and say to themselves, how did those people allow all those amazing creatures to vanish?” I think this relates to the fact that it would be ineffective to attempt to save the species on earth if people are not motivated to be educated into being better stewards. This documentary uses photography to speak to the larger societal issues of the human relationship with our natural environment and the sociological…