Peter is undoable different than Matilda. Unlike Matilda, Peter “is a qualified and experienced teacher seeking to learn from the local teacher who he views as reservoirs of cultural knowledge” (p. 97). I feel like Peter does not feel the calling to evangelize instead to grow in his profession. He seems to aim for teaching before sharing the gospel-is he wrong? No. I believe that he is obviously not triggered to evangelize as Elizabeth. On the same note of triggered, Elizabeth does not wish to produce teaching skills and to grow in this area as Peter. I believe Peter is an example of a teacher who desires to teach and show Christian spiritual fruits without forcing his own believes on his students. In this specific scenario I did not read anything about the agency that hired him. I suppose that his education and experience were enough to support evidence that his is the perfect candidate to teach …show more content…
I would like to glorify God’s name through my teaching style. I would like to impact my students’ lives instead of them seeing me as a threat. I plan to teach and learn from them, but not convert them to my Christian faith. pedagogy-Unlike Elizabeth, I believe like Peter on the importance on “encouraging an exploration of code missing and switching” (p. 97). I plan to have students speak in their native language, however it will be limited and not impeded. Also, they are welcome to bring up religious topics as long as it is to learn about each other’s belief and not to judge or to convert. interactions-On the same note as Matilda and Peter’s is where I stand. Both Matilda and Peter had a similar response. Interaction outside of class with the community and other teachers is important. Therefore, I strive to interact with “expatriate and local colleagues in a number…” to learn from the language and