He also uses Carl von Clausewitz book, On War because, “This study offers an alternative understanding to Weigley's, one based on the proposition that war focused on noncombatant populations is itself a fundamental part of Americans' military past, indeed, is Americans' first way of…
TITLE MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18 November 2017, H100 Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments…
Carl Philipp Gottfried von Clausewitz was a Prussian soldier who later became a major military thinker of the 19th century. Antoine-Henri Jomini was a Swiss man that joined the French revolution and even joining Russia and would become the most popular thinker of his time. Both Jomini and Clausewitz share many similarities more than their differences yet they both do focus on two different camps of ideas, the importance of strategy and chaos in war.…
“From a strategic standpoint, the American way of war seeks swift military victory, independent of strategic policy success; the desired political and military outcomes do not always align. When analyzed, this…
General George S. Patton referred to by many historians as the “Forgotten General” didn’t see much action in almost the entirety of his military career. In fact he did not have the opportunity to show his genius in military warfare until World War II. It wasn’t until the end of 1942 thru 1945 that General Patton had finally proved to the world the genius he was in tactical warfare, and many compared him to Hitler because of his talk of never giving up an inch of land, his contempt for civilian authority, and his joy at killing. Patton’s love of war, coupled with his seemingly coldhearted approach to battle, still makes his critics uncomfortable. Despite the…
The Art of War is a military text composed of multiple sections that discuss military tactics without restricting them to specific situations. This allows for individuals, such as Mao Zedong, to create their own military doctrines based upon The Art of War’s teaching. In a 1968 interview, Mao Zedong admitted to having read Sun Tzu 's The Art of War before writing his own works on military tactics from 1936 to 1938. Sun Tzu’s diction indicates a serious tone as shown by The Art of War’s succinct sentences that emphasize decisive action. Sentences such as “There is no instance of a country having benefitted from prolonged warfare” and “In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns” candidly highlight the importance of thorough military planning and sharp execution.…
As mentioned in this topic’s preface, what previous generations of military leaders lacked in technology was compensated for with brilliant combat tact. A true maverick trait manifests itself as the ability to advance on opposition by way of surprise and deception. Arthur Wesley, the first Duke of Wellington, was a master of covert operations. His ability to think rationally and act coolly while under fire made him a dangerous adversary for any adversary. Combined, these characteristics of Wellington’s skill as a military leader helped secure victory for Britain in 1803 during the Maratha Battles (Harvey, 2008).…
[ 18 ]. Harry Yeide, “The German View of Patton,” World War II 26 (2012): 27.…
While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…
Rengger, N. (2002) ‚On the just war tradition in the twenty-first century‘, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International…
David Irving has experienced praise and support from renowned academics in the field of history. Irving’s work is “the best study we have of the German side of the second world war” (D.D. Guttenplan 1). Gordon Craig, a leading scholar of German history at Stanford University, praises Irving’s energy as a researcher. Irving is described as a relentless document researcher, as he spent years collecting and analyzing Nazi archives. Research and analysis are some of the key operations of historians. Military…
Clausewitz understood that “so-called mathematical factors never find a firm basis in military calculations. From the very start there is an interplay of possibilities, probabilities, good luck and bad that weaves its way throughout the length of the tapestry,” meaning nothing in war is ever certain and, therefore, one’s strategy can never be certain. Likewise, Sun Tzu acknowledged, “in war there may be one hundred changes in each step.” The strategy involved in winning a war must change constantly because one must manage the variables in one’s own strategy and, simultaneously, one must attempt to affect the enemy’s strategy. According to Sun Tzu, war is non-rational because you are in constant exchange with an enemy, “as water shapes its flow in accordance with the ground, so an army manages its victory in accordance with the situation of the enemy. And as water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions.” Clausewitz als believed war is non-rational because of human nature, “in a world dominated so much by chance- courage, daring, boldness, and trust in one’s luck are essential qualities for a great commander.” These two ideals go hand-in-hand with one another. When fighting a war, one must constantly react to the enemy’s efforts, which are unpredictable because the enemy is human and reacting to one’s own decisions. This continual interchange creates a non-rational environment full…
German sociologist Max Weber wrote of the Great War, “this war, with all its ghastliness, is nevertheless grand and wonderful. It is worth experiencing” (EP 768). Embellishing the heroism of warfare, Weber reflects a common acceptance of war in the early twentieth century as one of sport and necessity. However, with the development of nuclear arms came a paradigm shift concerning war and its role amid international powers. Acknowledging the destructive potential of nuclear warfare, Kennedy adamantly stated, “We were not going to misjudge or challenge the other side needlessly, or precipitously push our adversaries into a course of action that was not intended” (75). Using historical precedent as his guide, President Kennedy acts upon the belief that war is rarely intentional, while also recognizing the evolving dynamic of war as one of an arms struggle.…
Reading “The Yellow wall paper made me feel small and vulnerable. Feelings that woman of that time were often privy too. My point of view on myself and the world didn’t change but I was reminded of how privileged I am to live in a world that values women.…
I have decided to write my paper over two of the greatest generals of World War II: Erwin Rommal and George S. Patton. These two men are the most well known generals of World War II and for a reason. They both are nearly identical in the way they fought their fought their opponents…