Preview

Three Strike Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Strike Law
Three Strikes Law
Jackie Andre
Criminal Justice 140

Fact, 3 Strikes Law clogs the courts docket. Fact, the law destroys the flexibility of the courts and the judges. Fact, not all felonies are considered violent. Fact, the 3 Strikes Law impose life sentences on offenders whose crimes don 't warrant such harsh punishment . The United States criminal court systems are notably overcrowded due to the pressing backlogs of the increasing crime rate of our country. On March 4th 1994,the 3 Strike law came into effect. The 3 Strike law states that a person who is convicted of three felonies is given a mandatory 25 to life sentence (ACLU,2002). According to US Legal Definition, a felony is an offense for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year is authorized. Felonies are serious crimes, such as murder, rape, or burglary, punishable by a harsher sentence than that given for a misdemeanor (USLegal,2010). The 3 Strikes Laws will impose life sentences on offenders whose crimes don 't warrant such harsh punishment. For example, a person drives a motor vehicle after consuming alcohol beverages, the driver falls sleep while driving then crashes into a unoccupied vehicle which is parked on the side of the road. When law enforcement arrives, the vehicle operator is given a field sobriety and breathalyzer test and learns that the driver is well above the legal drinking limit. This is considered a victimless crime due to there was no victim injury and a felony due to the driver being intoxicated while committing property damage. Let’s change the example a little. A person drives a motor vehicle after consuming alcohol beverages, the driver falls asleep while driving when suddenly the driver crashes into a occupied vehicle which is parked on the side of the road. When law enforcement arrives, the vehicle operator is given a field sobriety and breathalyzer test and learns that the driver is well above the legal drinking limit. This would be



References: American Civil Liberties Union , Initials. (2002, March 17). 10 reasons to oppose "3 strikes, you 're out" . Retrieved from www.aclu.org/racial-justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrants-rights/10-reasons-oppose-3-strikes-youre- Institution of public law. (1997-2010). Retrieved from index2.php?reqstyleid=1# Uslegal,Inc. (2001-2010). Retrieved from www.definitions.uslegal.com/f/felony/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What evidence can help the public with their concerns and ultimate acceptance of changes in the three strikes…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 4: Should juveniles who are arrested three or more times face mandatory incarceration sentences such as those contained in the three-strikes legislation?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    California 's three strikes law allows the idea that any felonies can constitute the third strike, and can subject a defendant to a term of 25 years to life in prison. The prosecutor charged the two counts of Andrade 's theft as felonies. Andrade argued that he should only receive one term of 25 years to life in prison because the courts can dismiss strikes on a count-by-count basis (Katsh, William Rose 219).…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “One punch” assaults known as “The King Hit” have cost over 90 lives since the year 2000. New South Wales have had the largest number of one punch assaults which is 28, followed by Queensland and Victoria who have recorded 24 cases each. Picture this, imagine a teenage boy who is having fun with his mates, and he gets “King Hit” by a stranger in which had taken his life. You would think that the killer would receive a very harsh prison sentence right? Well that isn’t always the case. One person who was a victim in a situation very similar to this. Thomas Kelly. Thomas Kelly is an 18 year old boy who was “King Hit” in Kings Cross in New South Wales. All it took was one punch to end his life. The attacker received a 4 year minimum prison sentence. The public was disgusted with the Australian justice system. These one punch offenders should receive a much higher prison sentence than others have had in previous years. How would you feel the person who killed your friend or family member would be walking out on the streets in only a few years time. There are three main points I am going make about this issue. They include: the prison sentencing is too low, victims family and friends pay the price and one punch assaults cause by alcohol and drugs.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. In 1980 they reformed the federal sentencing. The intent was to provide determinate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed period of incarceration without the possibility of parole, but time served can be reduced by accumulating good time. “Coinciding with the development of determinate sentencing has been the development of sentencing guidelines to control and structure the process and make it more rational. Guidelines are usually based on the seriousness of a crime and the background of an offender: The more serious the crime and the more extensive the offender’s criminal background, the longer the prison term recommended by the guidelines.” (Segel & Senna 2006). These guidelines were designed to eliminate judicial discretion and get tough on crime.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the text, “Crime statistics provide an overview of criminal activity. If used properly, a statistical picture of crime can serve as a powerful tool for creating social policy. Decision makers at all levels, including legislators, other elected officials, and administrators throughout the criminal justice system, rely on crime data to analyze and evaluate existing programs, to fashion and design new crime-control initiatives, to develop funding requests, and to plan new laws and crime control legislation. Many “get tough” policies, such as the three-strikes movement that swept the country during the 1990s, have been based in large part on the measured ineffectiveness of existing programs to reduce the incidence of repeat offending.” (chapter 2 Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, Eleventh Edition, by Frank Schmalleger. Published by Prentice Hall.)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brown, Brian. "A Primer: Three Strikes: The Impact After More Than a Decade." California Legislative Analyst 's Office. Legislative Analysts Office, Oct. 2005. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. .…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roughly 1/3 of strikers convicted for crimes are again other people The most common is robbery, burglary, assault and possession of drugs. (lao.ca.gov) half of the strikers are convicted of non-serious non-violent crimes. This is where the statistics raise people’s thoughts on the three strikes rule and calls it harsh. If you think of violent crimes, especially three violent crimes on one person, when you hear that they were sentenced to 25 years to life it seems appropriate. When you hear of non-violent crimes 25 years to life does seem to be pretty extensive. In our society, we want peace that means no violence. So to sentence a 3 time convicted person of having marijuana on them to 25 years to life in prison vs. the man who assaults people with weapons three times or more is…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three strike law became very popular in the 1990s. These statutes are enacted by state government and require the state court to hand down a mandatory and extended sentence to a repeat offender that has committed two or more previous offences. Between 1993 and 1995, 26 states and the federal government passed three strikes laws. The lawmakers were forced to take a second look at the punishment of repeat offenders after the kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Polly…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Begun in the 1990s, the Three Strikes Laws are a category of statutes which were enacted in the United States by certain state governments. These laws were enacted to mandate longer periods of imprisonment for persons convicted of a felony on three or more separate offenses. The term is used similar the three strikes and you’re out rule in baseball. This could also be described, as such statutes are most often known, officially as mandatory sentencing laws.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not believe that the ends justify the means when it comes to mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses. The reason for enacting these laws was to try and deter crime, but research has shown that harsher punishments does not lead to a decrease in crime rates. Incarcerating people for drug offenses is not an effective way to combat drug crimes. The space in prisons, and funds used to fight drug crimes should both be focused more on violent…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three strikes raises important questions about how sentencing laws need to achieve public safety. How are such laws made? Who do they target? And why did Michael Reynolds and Mark Klaas start out as allies and end up as bitter political rivals.…

    • 5293 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays