Preview

To what extent is it true to say that the eighteenth century up to 1792was the age of limited warfare?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent is it true to say that the eighteenth century up to 1792was the age of limited warfare?
To what extent is it true to say that the eighteenth century up to 1792 was the age of limited warfare?

To call the 18th century the age of limited warfare would be to imply that it was mild and restrained. Limited can be assumed to refer to the small-scale, cautious tactics and limited goals of the warfare of the time; generally, whole societies did not need to be mobilized, and whole nations were neither conquered nor annihilated. Armies were the property of monarchs rather than countries, and subject only to their intents and purposes of war were not yet the concern of the masses. The wars of the eighteenth century were largely fought for material, rather than ideological, reasons: generally specific territory or resources.

The 18th Century war was a game they [rulers] play for what is staked, not for all they have in the world. Compared the religiously motivated and incredibly destructive Thirty Years War of the previous century, wars of the eighteenth century were fairly composed. There was no longer a need for the complete annihilation of one’s enemy; enemy had become flexible term, as the deep-rooted religious or moral differences that had motivated previous feuds were now paid less heed. There was little real ill-will between opposing parties, de Saint-Etienne went so far as to say, µour legions thunder upon one another politely; the heroes salute before they proceed to kill; the soldiers of hostile armies pay mutual visits before the battle “Without the impassioning influence of ideology, acts of deliberate and sporadic violence were less common, and so warfare was markedly more reserved. The humanising influence of the Enlightenment was also important in encouraging a move towards more limited forms of warfare. The three fundamental beliefs of the enlightenment individualism, relativism and rationality argued against war on the grounds of its destructive nature and its taking of human life. The ideas of the Enlightenment were certainly limiting,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the eighteenth century the Ottoman Empire lost much of its power to provincial governors, escalating many new encounters of reform. To justify or deny such climatic choices of reform called for a time of war. Following times of war were times of recovery; however, some empires could not withhold such responsibilities and fell through the cracks of their own broken establishment.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jomini when describing the principles of war he makes the argument that “To throw by strategic movement the mass of an army, successively, upon the decisive point of a theater of war…” (Jomini, pg70). Clausewitz makes it clear that war is serious and therefore a country cannot limit their war effort saying, “He who uses his forces ruthlessly, shrinking from no amount of bloodshed must gain an advantage if his adversary does not do the same,” (Clausewitz pg 265). Both of these men learned many of ideas of military success came from the Napoleonic wars. The French under Napoleon’s regime shows the way in which a population that practices total war principles, an army in mass and ruthless no prisoners policy, would be able to defeat any army that does not also practice this same mentality. Napoleon incorporated both the ideas of strategic movement with those of principles of ruthless military campaign.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was born into slavery sometime in 1795, in Southampton County, Virginia. His actions helped him become a big part in how he shaped the court and slavery. When Dred scott was brought into free states while he was a slave he thought it to be wrong because they were free states. Dred scott argued they should restrict(to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity) the entrance of slave owners into free states if they have slaves with them, or that the slaves should be free if they enter a free state. This topic(a subject of conversation or discussion) made it up to the supreme court where Roger B. Taney(Chief justice of the supreme court) said that Dred Scott did not have any right to bring his…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When compared to the Battles of Aguncourt and Waterloo (respectively), Keegan's analysis of war through the ages, despite its many consistencies, Keegan notes several trends in the character of battle. For instance, in the uncertain examination of war he remarks that, “One statement can be safely made…battles have been getting longer,” (308). At Agincourt, the English forces repelled a numerically superior French force in a matter of hours. The Battle of Waterloo found Napoleon defeated in a matter of days, while the battle of the Somme lasted months. Keegan remarks on the exposure, technical difficulty, accident rate, and objectives dangers faced by modern…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advancements in weaponry surpassed ancient tactics dating back to the Revolutionary War and inflicted staggering casualties. Railways allowed supplies and reinforcements to transcend conventional means, battles became fast paced requiring even more men to fuel the engine of war. These weapons and technologies bred the…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance is known as a period of advancements in trade and art and as a time where people of different backgrounds gathered together, clashing overall ways of life. One aspect that is often overlooked, however, is the effect the Renaissance had on the clashing of swords. Before the Renaissance, soldiers stood on opposites ends of each other and charged like barbarians with swords and sticks, or whatever they could scrounge together to fight. The Renaissance brought a change to the literal concept of how battles were fought. The movement away from barbaric types of warfare and towards more refined ways of fighting is demonstrated through several contributing three key facets. The factors that led to significant military advances for Europe during the Renaissance were the movement towards swifter, more durable ships that could defend themselves on the high seas and the creations that derived from gunpowder, and how it made the military weapons used before it obsolete. Ultimately, the most significant military advancement of the European Renaissance is how the Reformation created the…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Towards the end of the eighteenth century the nature of warfare would dramatically change on both upon the battlefield but more importantly how it affected society. Continental Europe was engulfed in war from 1792 following the establishment of the French Republic and continued with the rise of Napoleon until his eventual defeat in 1815. Between 1792 and 1809 the French army seemed to grow from strength to strength turning from a “métier of the aristocrat” small, professional army to the first mass citizen army of the modern world. The success of the Napoleonic era French military in the first five coalition wars cannot be credited to one cause alone. Instead the Revolutionary/Napoleons’ Army (Grande Armée from 1805) had several contributing factors to its major successes.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Wars of Religion in the 17th and 18th centuries were some of the bloodiest conflicts of all of European history before the World Wars. They spanned the entire continent, involved nearly every member of society, and resulted in the deaths of millions. Reactions to these wars varied– some were in favour, some were opposed. However, despite the fact that people’s reactions deviated wildly, the evidence shows that many rulers had a similar attitude towards the Wars of Religion, and manipulated them for the benefit of themselves or their country.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sherman's March

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How did this campaign reflect the changing nature of war? - Sherman’s campaign would add a new dimension to this war. It would be defined as Total War. It is interesting to consider that Alexander the Great embraced the concept of Total War and Sherman endorsed that concept to Grant was mired in a battle of attrition. Virtually all the experience to fight this war was gained by experience. Sherman used all his resources to seek victory. Carl von Clausewitz, pointed to the implementing a concept of crushing your enemy and said wars trend to increase in violence. World Wars I and II are considered as total wars. McPherson, J. (1988). The battle cry of freedom…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, "old fashioned" tactics were used in every day combat tactics. Trench warfare and massive offensives designed by old world general sipping cognac in their comfortable leather armchairs, sending foot soldiers to be butchered to an almost certain death as if they were young boys simulating a battle with lead soldiers, are there to remind us that this war was not "franche et joyeuse" (clearcut: "brave and joyous" is the best translation I could think of).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A numerous amount of revolutions have taken place throughout the storied history on earth, ranging from the unremarkable and forgettable, to the famous and extravagant such as the English and American Revolutions. As we study American history, we can see that on many counts, the phrase “history repeats itself”, reveals much truth. Both the English Civil War and the American Revolution consist of similarities, whether general or specific. Many of the events triggering the specific wars and the weaponry involved in battle, share a correlation with one another. Both wars were triggered due to a disagreement on both political and economical aspects, and even though they didn’t take place immediately following…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    9. Sproxton, J. (1995). Violence and religion: Attitudes towards militancy in the French civil wars and the English Revolution. London ; New York: Routledge.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liturgy of Humiliation

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The 18th century was an incredibly different time, full of corruption and brutality. New France…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries contributed to the culture and society of the 18th century by helping build up people’s understanding of the world by ensuing the enlightenment. Unfortunately, The events of the 16th and 17th century also greatly contributed to terror on a global scale through the wars of the 1700s.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays