Tuckman's Team Stage Model

Shaper, implementer, completer-finisher, coordinator, team worker, resource investigator, plant, monitor- evaluator.
Each person should be clear as to what their role is and work together to achieve their goal. In a smaller team, people may have more than one role. There are other models that exist such as Tuckmans Stage Model,Hackman’s Inputs-Processes-Outputs Model, Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions of a Team, and Curphy and Hogan’s Rocket Model however, all are different.
Tuckman’s Stage Model has identified that groups go through stages known as: forming, storming, norming, and performing. Groups do not become highly effective until they reach the performing stage. Hackman’s Inputs-Processes-Outputs Model states that the inputs are the raw materials that the group uses such
Lencioni developed a team stage model that includes: absence of trust; fear of conflict; lack of commitment; avoidance of accountability; and inattention to results. The model provides some useful insights into team dynamics, but is not based on sound research, and although it seems to make intuitive sense, in many cases it is simply wrong. It is quite clear that the above mentioned practices in a group will lead to problems in teams per se and quite evident. Curphy and Hogan’s Rocket Model. The Rocket Model capitalizes on the advantages of the previous frameworks in that it is based on research from hundreds of teams and provides sound, practical advice for improving group and team performance. The Rocket Model consists of eight components, which include context, mission, talent, norms, buy-in, power, morale, and results. Context concerns gaining team member agreement on the challenges facing the team; mission is setting team goals and benchmarks; talent focuses on the number, roles, and skills of team members; norms pertain to the rules by which team members operate; buy-in is all about fostering employee engagement; power concerns acquiring needed authority and resources; morale