Since …show more content…
They have shown that teens get drunk twice as quickly as adults and often do not know when it is the appropriate time to stop [5]. They also have stated that teens will often overdo drinking, often leading to binge drinking. Other advocators for this law express that there are many different ages of initiation -- hunting (12), driving (16), voting (18), and running for president (35) -- so why can’t there be one for drinking [6]. And they also point out that this minimum age is based on scientific studies that focus on crashes, fatalities, and car …show more content…
Does a minimum drinking age take away people’s freedom? Or does it insure that they will have a chance to live out their lives? Both sides will always find arguments to counter their opposition so this may continue to go around in circles forever. But with 77% of people supporting a MLDA of 21, there isn’t much hope for opposers. Unless there is some hard evidence found that can 100% without a doubt prove the opposer’s arguments to be true, the MLDA of 21 law will stay in place to protect the youth in