To begin with, Lou (2013), in his article provided reasons why he believes that a fence on the U.S and Mexico border would not prevent illegals from coming to the U.S. He believes that the fence is not in any way a solution to the illegal emigrant menace. He acknowledges the fact that despite the fact there is a 652-mile fence along the southern border, and 352 miles of …show more content…
Basically, in agreement with Lou, a wall should not be built on the border. This is because the wall would not fix the problem and is not logistically implausible. Firstly, as highlighted by Lou (2013), it has been found that the southern fence had patches and tunnels, the wall would definitely not fix the problem of illegal immigrants. As a matter of fact, a wall would create a strong incentive for the illegal immigrants already the U.S. Once an immigrant has illegally crossed the border into the country, he/she would be much less likely to leave, knowing that it would be difficult to get back in the country again.
Importantly, a wall would not at all solve the problem of people overstaying their visas. Moreover, the wall would antagonize Mexico leading to diplomatic rows. In addition, conservatives argue that building a wall is too extreme a reaction to the illegal