Preview

War Brings Peace

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Brings Peace
khawar
Custom Essay

Can War Bring Peace?
Essay "Can War Bring Peace? " from category Philosophy
First M . Last Name Professor ‘s Name Class and Number 7 February 2007 Can War Bring Peace ?War is considered as a particular branch of a specific philosophy , with Carl von Clausewitz being considered as the “only philosopher of war ‘stated in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . It also says that it refers to , “a phenomenon which occurs only between political communities ‘ or “certain political pressure groups , like terrorist organizations , might also be considered `political communities ‘ in that they are associations of people with a political purpose (Stanford ,War , 2005 . On the other hand , peace is the pursuit of justice with opposite methods of human diversity and who seek peace are more or less responsible for social changes in visionary ways , while the proponents of war are considered to be narrow minded with one thing in mind – to win something they want , using whatever methods they need to accomplish this .Religion has been blamed as the cause of many wars , yet they considered themselves to be an advocacy for non-violence . A source of conflict ,religion is also a philosophy and practitioner of peace . Contradictory in itself , this explains the conflicting views bringing war into existence . Not all wars are caused by opposing religious views , but the majority of them are . Jenny Teichman wrote in The Philosophy of War and Peace that “Aggressive wars have often been waged for religious reasons and still are today (Teichman , 2002 , pg . 2 .According to Alexander Mosley in Philosophy of War , “man cannot stop war – it is his nature to wage war ‘ which backs my theory that war is the product of man ‘s ideas and hence is a product of choice . We fight for peace through war , and war continues on until peace comes into being–these are contradictory statements . Peace found through war is not peace , only a win-win situation , or a give-in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War brings death and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. Although war may not always be the first answer or the most beneficial, it is an inescapable evil because war has brought the world peace and prosperity while banding people together to fight for a cause. It leads to national growth and solves domestic problems between countries; Injustice and tyranny can be quelled as the aftereffect of war. On the contrary, war includes loss of human life, spreads of diseases, and induces a feeling of anxiety and dismay among communities. The brutal sacrifices that innocent people undergo may not be worth the outcome.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ap dbq 1

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While some religions, like Christianity and Islam, may have defended war in time of defense, other such as Buddhism condemned war at all accounts, as well as the Daoism. I will now go through some different religious views on war.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the creation of religion, there has always been a debate to whether or not religion is the main cause of conflicts throughout history. In Karen Armstrong’s book “Fields of Blood”, she argues that people use religion as an excuse for the cause of wars and ignore all other aspects. Karen Armstrong is correct. Throughout history, there were many wars and conflicts that weren’t caused by religion yet many leaders used the blame of religion to their advantage to conceal their true intentions. Wars using religion as a cover up for power is shown in the expansion of the Islamic Empire and in ISIS, while motivation from religion opposes Armstrong’s idea.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict is inevitable, and constantly present in life. Whether it’s obvious and right in front of your face or hidden beneath a pile of lies someone will always suffer because of it. Although that being said, without it- would we truly understand the importance of peace? There are some out there who believe that some of the greatest triumphs and acts of the human spirit were during times of great conflict such as wars and repression’s. But I believe that these events have caused the most horrific demonstrations of human nature in the act of killing the innocent.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion is one of the complex issues in the world. The aspects of religion diversity elaborate on how the society is diverse, which should be embraced. One of the debatable issues in the world today is whether religion causes war in the world. Other belief that religion is important in society and does not cause war. On the other hand, there are people who believe that religion causes war. Religion entails a collection of world views on humanity, beliefs, and cultural systems that focus on the order of existence. In the general perspective, religion has some aspects that cause war in society.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In World War one, Woodrow Wilson insisted that the allies would negotiate only with a democratic government in Germany, and the Armistice did not go into effect until the Kaiser abdicated. In World War two the allies demanded the unconditional surrender of Axis governments in order to destroyed these governments and install new pones in their place. Both sides in the American Civil War feared that regime change would be the results of losing the war. By 1863, however the death and wounded of half a million soldiers had replaced the rage with a longing for peace. Seems like in the American Civil War, there was no possibility of peace without victory for either one side or the other. If there is to be peace one of two of the events has to happen. Either the Union was to be maintained, which would mean that the rebellion of the South had to be crushed, or that rebellion had to succeed in the establishment of a nation conceived on slavery. Lincoln did not believe that the Confederate agents had skills of negotiating. And if they did the Union president knew that his Southern “counterparts inflexible conditioned for peace was Confederate independence.” There are other conflicts that are not worth fighting for and where an honorable compromise can be made between two sides. I think that there is at least the possibility of a peace that satisfies both sides, even if neither side gets everything they want. Sometimes, there can be no peace without victory. This happens when there are only two options and an impossibility to compromised between the two, or when the argument involves matters of principle where there are only two options: yes or no. In such a case, any yes is victory to one side and any no is victory to the other.…

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “War, what is it good for”? The lyrics to the 60’s pop song, provokes the question that Just War proponents and Pacifists have wrestled with throughout history, reaching opposite conclusions. Those in favor of Just War theory, say war is only good insofar as it is fought for the right reasons and brings about the right end. Whereas, Pacifists reject war completely, preferring peaceful means to resolve conflict. But which one is morally and ethically right? Which one should be adopted and practiced by the Nations of this World? Upon examining the logic and philosophical implications of each ethical stance, one is able to sympathize with them both, seeing their values and virtue.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Johnson, James Turner "Thinking comparatively about religion and war." Journal of Religious Ethics 36.1 (2008): 157-179. ATLA Religion Database. EBSCO. Web. 4 Nov. 2009.…

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Katelyn Mireles Theo 2500-Spring 2016 May 1st, 2016 Book Report Dear, John. The God of Peace: Toward a Theology of Nonviolence. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1994. Print.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Elshtain, Jean B. “What Is A Just War.” Reading The World: Ideas That Matter. 2nd ed. ED Michael Austin. New York: Norton, 2009. 303.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing! Around the World everyday there is some type of war happening. War affect everyone and thousands or even millions die because of war. The problem or issue that I’m going to talk about is why war is morally wrong and can war ever be justified. This Essay will talk about many thing including the three traditions of thought that dominate the ethics of war and peace: Realism; Pacifism; and the Just War Theory. Another thing I’m going to talk about is why war should be understood as an actual intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities. I’m also going talk where does the church stand on the topic of war. There are lots of debates on war whether it a good thing or an awful thing on the face of the earth. So the controversy behind this topic that some people believe that you can achieve a common good by going to war. By that I mean war help out the economy, For Example in 1930’s The Great Depression was happening and World War II brought jobs that caused The Great Depression to end. The Other group of people believe that going to war is completely wrong, that you will not achieve anything and make the situation worst. For Example, pretend the rebel took out the angry dictator, the country will be unsettled with no government or Constitution. Post World War II, The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization established 24 October 1945, to promote international co-operation. A replacement for the ineffective League of Nations, the organization was created following the Second World War to prevent another such conflict. Most of the time War violate human rights, For Example in World War Two there was a Jewish Genocide. Acts of genocide violate the most fundamental and broadly accepted principles of human conduct. The World Wars, and the huge losses of life and gross abuses of human rights that took place during them, were a driving force behind the development of modern human…

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Its purpose was to articulate the Catholic Church’s growing move from the just war theory as a “settled teaching”, in order to adopt a more “expansive call to proactive peacemaking” (Rynne, 2016). Specifically, five reasons were discussed that underlie the position taken [List 5 reasons on PowerPoint]. In recent decades, certain leaders of the Catholic Church have formed the belief that the theory is truncated and minimalist – as it focuses on the subject of war, not peace – and is essentially null and void by the massive, indiscriminate violence apparent in modern warfare. For example, in WWI, civilian deaths catered for 10 per cent of the death tally. However, the invasion of Iraq has seen civilian deaths now contributing to 80-90 per cent of all war casualties (Rynne, 2016). This call for peacemaking is reinforced when assessing the Sermon on the Mount, as it provides the vision for nonviolent resolutions, of which regimes have been found to be more effective, and more likely remain at peace after their struggles (Rynne, 2016). One of the key areas of the government’s purpose, is to reflect and act upon the morality of…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays